Differenzielle Wirksamkeit eines Short Message Service (SMS)-basierten Programms zur Förderung des Rauchstopps bei Jugendlichen

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Ein SMS-basiertes Programm zur Förderung der Rauchabstinenz bei Auszubildenden konnte deren Zigarettenkonsum reduzieren und begünstigte bei gelegentlich Rauchenden Aufhörversuche.

Methodik: Wir testeten, ob sich die Wirksamkeit des Programms in Abhängigkeit von demografischen, gesundheits- oder rauchspezifischen Charakteristika der Teilnehmenden unterscheidet.

Ergebnisse: Es wurden Subgruppen identifiziert, bei denen der Einsatz des Programms besonders sinnvoll erscheint.

Schlussfolgerung: Eine Programmoptimierung und mögliche Wirksamkeitssteigerung ist auf Grundlage der vorliegenden Ergebnisse möglich.

Abstract

Background: The results of a cluster randomised trial testing the efficacy of a text messaging (SMS)-based program for smoking cessation in vocational school students showed no short-term effects on smoking cessation; however the program resulted in lower cigarette consumption. Furthermore, occasional smokers of the intervention group made more attempts to quit smoking than occasional smokers in the control group.

Methods: Moderator analyses were conducted to test whether program efficacy differed according to demographic, health- and smoking-related baseline variables of the participants.

Results: In daily smokers, reduction of cigarette consumption was not moderated by any of the examined baseline variables. In occasional smokers, age moderated the reduction of cigarette consumption, with a higher reduction in older students. In the subgroup of daily smokers, the intervention more often resulted in progress on the stages of health behaviour change in male smokers and in smokers with at risk drinking. Furthermore, the intervention resulted in more serious quit attempts in daily smokers aged 18 years or older.

Conclusion: The results provide information on subgroups, which particularly benefit from participation in the SMS-program.

Schlüsselwörter

Tabak - Rauchen - Short Message Service (SMS) - Jugendliche - Auszubildende

Keywords

smoking cessation - text messaging - Short Message Service (SMS) - young people - students

• Literatur

• 1 Hibell B, Guttormsson U, Ahlström S et al. The 2011 ESPAD report. Substance use among students in 36 European countries. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs (CAN); 2012
• 2 Bundesamt für Statistik. Schulbesuchsquoten der 16–26-Jährigen 2010/11. Neuchâtel: Bundesamt für Statistik; 2012
• 3 Sekretariat der Kultusministerkonferenz. Schüler, Klassen, Lehrer und Absolventen der Schulen 2001 bis 2010. Berlin: Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland; 2011
• 4 Haug S, Schaub MP, Salis Gross C et al. Predictors of hazardous drinking, tobacco smoking and physical inactivity in vocational school students. BMC Pub Health 2013; 13: 475
• 5 Hanke M, Ulbricht S, Freyer-Adam J et al. Tabakrauchen und Alkoholkonsum bei Auszubildenden an beruflichen Schulen in Vorpommern. Gesundheitswesen 2013; 75: 216-224
• 6 Grimshaw GM, Stanton A. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD003289
• 7 Hollis JF, Polen MR, Whitlock EP et al. Teen reach: outcomes from a randomized, controlled trial of a tobacco reduction program for teens seen in primary medical care. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 981-989
• 8 Bühler A. Rauchstopp bei Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen – Grundlagen und Intervention. Sucht 2012; 58: 297-316
• 9 Morgenstern M, Herrmann U, Hanewinkel R. Rauchstopp-Hilfen für Jugendliche: Welche Faktoren beeinflussen Bekanntheit, Akzeptanz und Nutzung? Schlussbericht zum Forschungsprojekt. Kiel: Institut für Therapie- und Gesundheitsforschung; 2009
• 10 Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 673-693
• 11 Petersen KU, Batra A. Suchtpsychiatrie und -psychotherapie: Entwicklungslinien und Fortschritte. Psychiatrie 2011; 8: 219-225
• 12 Haug S, Meyer C, Gross B et al. Kontinuierliche individuelle Förderung der Rauchabstinenz bei sozial benachteiligten jungen Erwachsenen über das Handy – Ergebnisse einer Pilotstudie. Gesundheitswesen 2008; 70: 364-371
• 13 Fjeldsoe BS, Marshall AL, Miller YD. Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. Am J Prev Med 2009; 36: 165-173
• 14 Free C, Knight R, Robertson S et al. Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial. Lancet 2011; 378: 49-55
• 15 Willemse I, Waller G, Süss D, Genner S, Huber A-L. JAMES: Jugend, Aktivitäten, Medien – Erhebung Schweiz. Zürich: Zürcher Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften; 2012
• 16 Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest. JIM 2012. Jugend, Information, (Multi-) Media. Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland. (November 2012). Im Internet: http://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/JIM-pdf12/JIM2012_Endversion.pdf (Stand: 12.07.2013)
• 17 Haug S, Schaub MP, Venzin V et al. Efficacy of a Text Messaging (SMS) Based Smoking Cessation Intervention for Young People: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res [in press]
• 18 Pocock SJ. Clinical trials: a practical approach. Chichester: Wiley & Sons; 1994
• 19 Kraemer HC, Wilson GT, Fairburn CG et al. Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 59: 877-883
• 20 Sussman S, Sun P. Youth tobacco use cessation: 2008 update. Tob Induc Dis 2009; 5: 3
• 21 Curry SJ, Mermelstein RJ, Sporer AK. Therapy for Specific Problems: Youth Tobacco Cessation. Annu Rev Psychol 2009; 60: 229-255
• 22 Etter JF, Perneger TV. Effectiveness of a computer-tailored smoking cessation program: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 2596-2601
• 23 Strecher VJ, Shiffman S, West R. Moderators and mediators of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program among nicotine patch users. Nicotine Tob Res 2006; 8 (Suppl. 01) 95-101
• 24 Rooke S, Thorsteinsson E, Karpin A et al. Computer-delivered interventions for alcohol and tobacco use: a meta-analysis. Addiction 2010; 105: 1381-1390
• 25 Suls JM, Luger TM, Curry SJ et al. Efficacy of smoking-cessation interventions for young adults: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 2012; 42: 655-662
• 26 Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol Int Rev 2008; 57: 1-29
• 27 Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB et al. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1789-1795
• 28 Bradley KA, DeBenedetti AF, Volk RJ et al. AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2007; 31: 1208-1217
• 29 Lippke S, Ziegelmann JP, Schwarzer R et al. Validity of stage assessment in the adoption and maintenance of physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Psychol 2009; 28: 183-193
• 30 Cooper TV, Taylor T, Murray A et al. Differences between intermittent and light daily smokers in a population of U.S. military recruits. Nicotine Tob Res 2010; 12: 465-473
• 31 Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values: update of ICE. Stata J 2005; 5: 527-536
• 32 McClelland GH, Judd CM. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychol Bull 1993; 114: 376-390
• 33 Pomerleau CS, Pomerleau OF, Garcia AW. Biobehavioral research on nicotine use in women. Brit J Addict 1991; 86: 527-531
• 34 Royce JM, Corbett K, Sorensen G et al. Gender, social pressure, and smoking cessations: the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT) at baseline. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 359-370
• 35 Noar SM, Chabot M, Zimmerman RS. Applying health behavior theory to multiple behavior change: considerations and approaches. Prev Med 2008; 46: 275-280
• 36 Meyer C, Ulbricht S, Baumeister SE et al. Proactive interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice: a quasi-randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of computer-tailored letters and physician-delivered brief advice. Addiction 2008; 103: 294-304
• 37 Velicer WF, Redding CA, Sun X et al. Demographic variables, smoking variables, and outcome across five studies. Health Psychol 2007; 26: 278-287
• 38 Haug S, Meyer C, Ulbricht S et al. Predictors and moderators of outcome in different brief interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 78: 57-64
• 39 Kleinjan M, Engels RC, van Leeuwe J et al. Mechanisms of adolescent smoking cessation: roles of readiness to quit, nicotine dependence, and smoking of parents and peers. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 99: 204-214