Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32(07): 513-519
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1581075
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Free Vascularized Fibular Graft is Reliable in Upper Extremity Long-Bone Reconstruction with Good Long-Term Outcomes

Jussi Petteri Repo
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
,
Antti Sommarhem
2   Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
,
Risto P. Roine
3   Group Administration, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
4   Department of Health and Social Management, Research Centre for Comparative Effectiveness and Patient Safety, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
,
Harri Sintonen
5   Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, Helsinki, Finland
,
Timo Halonen
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
,
Erkki Tukiainen
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 October 2015

04 February 2016

Publication Date:
06 April 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Free vascularized fibular graft is useful in upper extremity long-bone reconstruction. The authors studied the reliability and long-term outcomes of this technique.

Methods The authors included 20 patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months in this study, and retrospectively reviewed patients' hospital records and used a preinformation form, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), and the 15D health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument to perform a cross-sectional assessment.

Results A total of 9 adults and 11 children underwent vascularized fibular transfer for radical tumor resection (n = 13), infection (n = 1), injury (n = 3), or secondary pseudoarthrosis (n = 3) in various locations of the upper extremity. The median follow-up period was 6 years. Six reoperations proved necessary: one early reanastomosis and five revisions with cancellous bone grafting to enhance union. Altogether, 19 of the 20 grafts survived: one graft failed due to infection. One arm was amputated due to tumor recurrence. The median duration of bone union was 12 months. One graft never achieved distal union, whereas another developed nonunion after a stress fracture. Ten patients completed the questionnaires, with a median of 15.3 years postoperatively. The results revealed functional capabilities ranging from no restrictions to significantly impaired, and an HRQoL comparable to that of an age-standardized general population.

Conclusion The free vascularized fibular graft is viable in different age groups to reconstruct upper extremity long-bone defects in cases of radical bone resection, extensive injury, and diaphyseal pseudoarthrosis. The long-term outcomes support the use of this technique.

Keywords

bone reconstruction - upper extremity - free vascularized fibula
 

  • References

  • 1 Myeroff C, Archdeacon M. Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (23) 2227-2236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bhatt RA, Rozental TD. Bone graft substitutes. Hand Clin 2012; 28 (4) 457-468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wong JC, Abraham JA. Upper extremity considerations for oncologic surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 2014; 45 (4) 541-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Erol B, Basci O, Topkar MO, Caypinar B, Basar H, Tetik C. Mid-term radiological and functional results of biological reconstructions of extremity-located bone sarcomas in children and young adults. J Pediatr Orthop B 2015; 24 (5) 469-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Houdek MT, Wagner ER, Wyles CC, Nanos III GP, Moran SL. New options for vascularized bone reconstruction in the upper extremity. Semin Plast Surg 2015; 29 (1) 20-29
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Taylor GI, Miller GD, Ham FJ. The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 55 (5) 533-544
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Innocenti M, Ceruso M, Manfrini M , et al. Free vascularized growth-plate transfer after bone tumor resection in children. J Reconstr Microsurg 1998; 14 (2) 137-143
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hollenbeck ST, Komatsu I, Woo S , et al. The current role of the vascularized-fibular osteocutaneous graft in the treatment of segmental defects of the upper extremity. Microsurgery 2011; 31 (3) 183-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Aro H, Hacklin E, Madanat R, Stranberg N. DASH-kyselykaavakkeen suomentaminen ja kulttuuriadaptaatio. Suomen Ortopedia Ja Traumatologia 2009; 32(3): 252-254
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C ; The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. Am J Ind Med 1996; 29 (6) 602-608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Repo JP, Tukiainen EJ, Roine RP, Ilves O, Järvenpää S, Häkkinen A. Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)–kyselylomakkeen suomen kielisen version luotettavuus ja validiteetti. Suomen Ortopedia Ja Traumatologia 2015; 38 (3) 205
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL ; North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. Phys Ther 1999; 79 (4) 371-383
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sintonen H. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med 2001; 33 (5) 328-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Alanne S, Roine RP, Räsänen P, Vainiola T, Sintonen H. Estimating the minimum important change in the 15D scores. Qual Life Res 2015; 24 (3) 599-606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Day NA. A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Ann Med 2001; 33 (5) 358-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Stavem K. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of two multiattribute utility measures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Qual Life Res 1999; 8 (1–2) 45-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Moock J, Kohlmann T. Comparing preference-based quality-of-life measures: results from rehabilitation patients with musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, or psychosomatic disorders. Qual Life Res 2008; 17 (3) 485-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Koskinen S, Lundqvist A, Ristiluoma N Eds. Health, functional capacity and welfare in Finland in 2011. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Report 68/2012. Helsinki: 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN. Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma 1984; 24 (8) 742-746
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Tang CH. Reconstruction of the bones and joints of the upper extremity by vascularized free fibular graft: report of 46 cases. J Reconstr Microsurg 1992; 8 (4) 285-292
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Yajima H, Tamai S, Ono H, Kizaki K, Yamauchi T. Free vascularized fibula grafts in surgery of the upper limb. J Reconstr Microsurg 1999; 15 (7) 515-521
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Adani R, Delcroix L, Innocenti M , et al. Reconstruction of large posttraumatic skeletal defects of the forearm by vascularized free fibular graft. Microsurgery 2004; 24 (6) 423-429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Zelenski N, Brigman BE, Levin LS, Erdmann D, Eward WC. The vascularized fibular graft in the pediatric upper extremity: a durable, biological solution to large oncologic defects. Sarcoma 2013; 2013: 321201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Germain MA, Mascard E, Dubousset J, Nguefack M. Free vascularized fibula and reconstruction of long bones in the child—our evolution. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (5) 415-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Soucacos PN, Korompilias AV, Vekris MD, Zoubos A, Beris AE. The free vascularized fibular graft for bridging large skeletal defects of the upper extremity. Microsurgery 2011; 31 (3) 190-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lee J, Oh SJ, Jung SW, Koh SH. Ilizarov distraction and vascularized fibular osteocutaneous graft for postosteomyelitis skeletal deformity of the forearm. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (9) 627-629
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 McCoy Jr TH, Kim HJ, Cross MB , et al. Bone tumor reconstruction with the Ilizarov method. J Surg Oncol 2013; 107 (4) 343-352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Micev AJ, Kalainov DM, Soneru AP. Masquelet technique for treatment of segmental bone loss in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (3) 593-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Wada T, Kawaguchi S, Isogai S, Nagoya S, Yamashita T. One-bone forearm reconstruction using vascularized fibular graft for massive forearm soft-tissue and bone defect: case report. J Reconstr Microsurg 2004; 20 (4) 285-289
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Yildirim S, Taylan G, Eker G, Aköz T. Free flap choice for soft tissue reconstruction of the severely damaged upper extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2006; 22 (8) 599-609
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Yokota K, Sunagawa T, Suzuki O, Nakanishi M, Ochi M. Short interposed pedicle of flow-through anterolateral thigh flap for reliable reconstruction of damaged upper extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (2) 109-114
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Iorio ML, Cheerharan M, Olding M. A systematic review and pooled analysis of peroneal artery perforators for fibula osteocutaneous and perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (3) 600-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Noaman HH. Management of upper limb bone defects using free vascularized osteoseptocutaneous fibular bone graft. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (5) 503-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Taniguchi Y, Yoshida M, Doi N, Tamaki K, Tamaki T. Vascularized fibular osteocutaneous grafts in the treatment of severely infected wrist arthritis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2002; 18 (2) 71-75
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Hsu RW, Wood MB, Sim FH, Chao EY. Free vascularised fibular grafting for reconstruction after tumour resection. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79 (1) 36-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Gebert C, Hillmann A, Schwappach A , et al. Free vascularized fibular grafting for reconstruction after tumor resection in the upper extremity. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94 (2) 114-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Innocenti M, Delcroix L, Manfrini M, Ceruso M, Capanna R. Vascularized proximal fibular epiphyseal transfer for distal radial reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (Pt 2, Suppl 1): 237-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Ling XF, Peng X. What is the price to pay for a free fibula flap? A systematic review of donor-site morbidity following free fibula flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (3) 657-674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Pototschnig H, Schaff J, Kovacs L, Biemer E, Papadopulos NA. The free osteofasciocutaneous fibula flap: clinical applications and surgical considerations. Injury 2013; 44 (3) 366-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar