At Home Photography-Based Method for Measuring Wrist Range of Motion

Abstract

Purpose To determine the reliability of wrist range of motion (WROM) measurements based on digital photographs taken by patients at home compared with traditional measurements done in the office with a goniometer.

Methods Sixty-nine postoperative patients were enrolled in this study at least 3 months postoperatively. Active and passive wrist flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation were recorded by one of the two attending surgeons with a 1-degree resolution goniometer at the last postoperative office visit. Patients were provided an illustrated instruction sheet detailing how to take digital photographic images at home in six wrist positions (active and passive flexion/extension, and radial/ulnar deviation). Wrist position was measured from digital images by both the attending surgeons in a randomized, blinded fashion on two separate occasions greater than 2 weeks apart using the same goniometer. Reliability analysis was performed using the intraclass correlation coefficient to assess agreement between clinical and photography-based goniometry, as well as intra- and interobserver agreement.

Results Out of 69 enrolled patients, 30 (43%) patients sent digital images. Of the 180 digital photographs, only 9 (5%) were missing or deemed inadequate for WROM measurements. Agreement between clinical and photography-based measurements was “almost perfect” for passive wrist flexion/extension and “substantial” for active wrist flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation. Inter- and intraobserver agreement for the attending surgeons was “almost perfect” for all measurements.

Discussion This study validates a photography-based goniometry protocol allowing accurate and reliable WROM measurements without direct physician contact. Passive WROM was more accurately measured from photographs than active WROM. This study builds on previous photography-based goniometry literature by validating a protocol in which patients or their families take and submit their own photographs.

Clinical Relevance Patient-performed photography-based goniometry represents an alternative to traditional clinical goniometry that could enable longer-term follow-up, overcome travel-related impediments to office visits, improve convenience, and reduce costs for patients.

Keywords

wrist goniometry - wrist range of motion - digital images - distance learning - remote access

Note

The study was approved by Hospital for Special Surgery Institutional Review Board (#2013–129).

• References

• 1 Ryu JY, Cooney III WP, Askew LJ, An KN, Chao EY. Functional ranges of motion of the wrist joint. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16 (03) 409-419
• 2 Boone DC, Azen SP, Lin CM, Spence C, Baron C, Lee L. Reliability of goniometric measurements. Phys Ther 1978; 58 (11) 1355-1360
• 3 Flowers KR, Stephens-Chisar J, LaStayo P, Galante BL. Intrarater reliability of a new method and instrumentation for measuring passive supination and pronation: a preliminary study. J Hand Ther 2001; 14 (01) 30-35
• 4 Blonna D, Zarkadas PC, Fitzsimmons JS, O'Driscoll SW. Accuracy and inter-observer reliability of visual estimation compared to clinical goniometry of the elbow. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (07) 1378-1385
• 5 Fish DR, Wingate L. Sources of goniometric error at the elbow. Phys Ther 1985; 65 (11) 1666-1670
• 6 Chapleau J, Canet F, Petit Y, Laflamme GY, Rouleau DM. Validity of goniometric elbow measurements: comparative study with a radiographic method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (11) 3134-3140
• 7 Ferriero G, Vercelli S, Sartorio F. , et al. Reliability of a smartphone-based goniometer for knee joint goniometry. Int J Rehabil Res 2013; 36 (02) 146-151
• 8 Kim TS, Park DD, Lee YB. , et al. A study on the measurement of wrist motion range using the iPhone 4 gyroscope application. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73 (02) 215-218
• 9 Hillstrom HJ, Garg R, Kraszewski A. , et al. Development of an anatomical wrist joint coordinate system to quantify motion during functional tasks. J Appl Biomech 2014; 30 (04) 586-593
• 10 Blonna D, Zarkadas PC, Fitzsimmons JS, O'Driscoll SW. Validation of a photography-based goniometry method for measuring joint range of motion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21 (01) 29-35
• 11 Naylor JM, Ko V, Adie S. , et al. Validity and reliability of using photography for measuring knee range of motion: a methodological study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 77 . Doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-77
• 12 Garg R, Kraszewski AP, Stoecklein HH. , et al. Wrist kinematic coupling and performance during functional tasks: effects of constrained motion. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (04) 634-642.e1
• 13 Crasto JA, Sayari AJ, Gray RR, Askari M. Comparative analysis of photograph-based clinical goniometry to standard techniques. Hand (NY) 2015; 10 (02) 248-253
• 14 Carter TI, Pansy B, Wolff AL. , et al. Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (08) 1422-1428
• 15 Trehan SK, Shifflett GD, Johnsen PH, Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Photography-based goniometric method for measuring wrist range of motion: Feasibility Study, AAHS 2015 Annual Meeting (poster presentation). Atlantis Paradise Island, BAH. January 21–24, 2015
• 16 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (01) 159-174
• 17 Wolff A, Weinstock-Zlotnick G, Gordon J. SSc management—in person appointments and remote therapy (SMART): a framework for management of chronic hand conditions. J Hand Ther 2014; 27 (02) 143-150