J Pediatr Intensive Care 2017; 06(04): 245-247
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604014
Review Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Controversy in the Determination of Death: Cultural Perspectives

Katherine Potter
1   Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

02 May 2017

28 May 2017

Publication Date:
27 June 2017 (online)


The definitions of death have changed throughout recorded history to include not just cardiac death but death by neurological criteria as well. Given the many cultures present in the world, it comes as no surprise that declaring death takes many forms. In the Western world, brain death has gained common acceptance (though not universal), while other cultures and religions have struggled with this issue, especially as it surrounds the controversy of donated organs. There is legal precedent to support death by neurological criteria, as well as support for hospital systems and physicians to terminate somatic support of the brain-dead patient; however, these laws differ greatly from country to country. When dealing with a controversial topic, differing laws, and grief-laden families, it becomes especially crucial that health care staffs are educated regarding varying cultural beliefs surrounding death. In the majority of cases, with kindness and compassion, common ground between science and social perspectives can be found, leading to resolution of care for this group of patients.

  • References

  • 1 Farrell MM, Levin DL. Brain death in the pediatric patient: historical, sociological, medical, religious, cultural, legal, and ethical considerations. Crit Care Med 1993; 21 (12) 1951-1965
  • 2 A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the ad hoc committee of the Harvard Medical School to examine the definition of brain death. JAMA 1968; 205 (06) 337-340
  • 3 President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Defining Death: A Report on the Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1981
  • 4 Burkle CM, Schipper AM, Wijdicks EF. Brain death and the courts. Neurology 2011; 76 (09) 837-841
  • 5 Baron M, Brasfield J. A 37-year-old man with severe head trauma, and a “hot nose” sign on brain flow study. Chest 1999; 116 (05) 1468-1470
  • 6 Wicks MN. Brain Death and Transplantation: The Japanese. Medscape 2000 . Available at: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/408769
  • 7 Morioka M. Reconsidering brain death: a lesson from Japan's fifteen years of experience. Hastings Cent Rep 2001; 31 (04) 41-46
  • 8 Randhawa G. Death and organ donation: meeting the needs of multiethnic and multifaith populations. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108 (Suppl. 01) i88-i91
  • 9 Parisi JE, Kim RC, Collins GH, Hilfinger MF. Brain death with prolonged somatic survival. N Engl J Med 1982; 306 (01) 14-16
  • 10 Maruya J, Nishimaki K, Nakahata J, Suzuki H, Fujita Y, Minakawa T. Prolonged somatic survival of clinically brain-dead adult patient. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2008; 48 (03) 114-117
  • 11 Bernstein IM, Watson M, Simmons GM, Catalano PM, Davis G, Collins R. Maternal brain death and prolonged fetal survival. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74 (3 Pt 2): 434-437
  • 12 Shewmon DA. Chronic “brain death”: meta-analysis and conceptual consequences. Neurology 1998; 51 (06) 1538-1545
  • 13 Baron L, Shemie SD, Teitelbaum J, Doig CJ. Brief review: history, concept and controversies in the neurological determination of death. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53 (06) 602-608