Am J Perinatol 2018; 35(01): 010-015
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604391
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

How Do Obstetric and Neonatology Teams Communicate Prior to High-Risk Deliveries?

Nathan C. Sundgren
1   Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Gautham K. Suresh
1   Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 April 2017

21 June 2017

Publication Date:
20 July 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background Improving communication in healthcare improves the quality of care and patient outcomes, but communication between obstetric and neonatal teams before and during a high-risk delivery is poorly studied.

Study Design We developed a survey to study communication between obstetric and neonatal teams around the time of a high-risk delivery. We surveyed neonatologists from North America and asked them to answer questions about their institutions' communication practices.

Results The survey answers revealed variations in communication practices between responders. Most institutions relied on nursing to communicate obstetric information to the neonatal team. Although a minority of institutions used a standardized communication process to summon neonatology team or to communicate in the delivery room, these reported higher rates of information sharing and greater satisfaction with communication between services.

Conclusion Standardized communication procedures are an underutilized method of communication and have the potential to improve communication around high-risk deliveries.

Supplementary Material

 
  • References

  • 1 Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 2016; 353: i2139
  • 2 Simpson KR, Knox GE. Common areas of litigation related to care during labor and birth: recommendations to promote patient safety and decrease risk exposure. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2003; 17 (02) 110-125
  • 3 White AA, Pichert JW, Bledsoe SH, Irwin C, Entman SS. Cause and effect analysis of closed claims in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (5, Pt 1): 1031-1038
  • 4 Kravitz RL, Rolph JE, McGuigan K. Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. I. Epidemiology of error in four specialties. JAMA 1991; 266 (15) 2087-2092
  • 5 Starmer AJ, Spector ND, Srivastava R. , et al; I-PASS Study Group. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. N Engl J Med 2014; 371 (19) 1803-1812
  • 6 Sentinel event alert issue 30--July 21, 2004. Preventing infant death and injury during delivery. Adv Neonatal Care 2004; 4 (04) 180-181
  • 7 Grobman WA, Holl J, Woods D, Gleason KM, Wassilak B, Szekendi MK. Perspectives on communication in labor and delivery: a focus group analysis. J Perinatol 2011; 31 (04) 240-245
  • 8 Weiner GM. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation, 7th ed. Elk Grove Village, Illinois: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2016
  • 9 Petrovic MA, Aboumatar H, Scholl AT. , et al. The perioperative handoff protocol: evaluating impacts on handoff defects and provider satisfaction in adult perianesthesia care units. J Clin Anesth 2015; 27 (02) 111-119
  • 10 Petrovic MA, Aboumatar H, Baumgartner WA. , et al. Pilot implementation of a perioperative protocol to guide operating room-to-intensive care unit patient handoffs. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012; 26 (01) 11-16
  • 11 Northway T, Krahn G, Thibault K. , et al. Surgical suite to pediatric intensive care unit handover protocol: implementation process and long-term sustainability. J Nurs Care Qual 2015; 30 (02) 113-120