Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1642620
Compliance on Mandatory Data Reporting in Registered Obstetrics Trials
Funding None.Publication History
12 October 2017
15 March 2018
Publication Date:
25 April 2018 (online)
Abstract
Background The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Amendments Act established a legal mandate requiring registration of certain drug, device, and biologics trials in ClinicalTrials.gov prior to patient enrollment. One provision of the act requires investigators to report trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov within 1 year of completion. Preliminary evidence suggests that overall compliance rates are inadequate, and rates specific to obstetrics have not been investigated.
Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the rate of compliance for mandatory reporting of results from obstetrics trials to ClinicalTrials.gov and to determine whether compliance rates were associated with funding type.
Study Design We performed a registry-based study of clinical trials pertaining to obstetrics. ClinicalTrials.gov was cross-referenced with Drugs@FDA to determine which trials required mandatory reporting. We used obstetrics trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with at least 1 US site. Phase 0, Phase 1, and trials not reporting a phase were excluded. Furthermore, only trials of interventions approved by the FDA were retained.
Results Our search returned 973 trials, of which 325 (33.4%) were screened for eligibility. Of the 325 completed trials, 74 (22.8% or 7.6% of the total) met all inclusion criteria and were evaluated for compliance. Thirty-seven of these trials (50%) did not list results, whereas the remaining 37 trials (50%) contained results on ClinicalTrials.gov. Trials funded by the National Institutes of Health (87.5%; ⅞) and industry (80%; 12/15) had higher rates of compliance than trials funded by other (43.9%; 18/41) or unspecified (0%; 0/10) sources.
Conclusion Half of all applicable obstetrics trials did not report results. Furthermore, rates of compliance appeared to vary by funding source, with trials funded by the National Institutes of Health or industry appearing to have a higher rate of compliance to mandatory data reporting. Greater awareness of federal regulations is needed, and changes should be implemented to increase reporting.
Keywords
antenatal - clinical trials - ClinicalTrials.gov - data reporting - fetal - intrapartum - obstetrics - postpartum - prenatal - pregnancy-
References
- 1 Stockmann C, Sherwin CM, Koren G. , et al. Characteristics and publication patterns of obstetric studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. J ClinPharmacol 2014; 54 (04) 432-437
- 2 Doering PL, Stewart RB. The extent and character of drug consumption during pregnancy. JAMA 1978; 239 (09) 843-846
- 3 Doering PL, Boothby LA, Cheok M. Review of pregnancy labeling of prescription drugs: is the current system adequate to inform of risks?. Am J ObstetGynecol 2002; 187 (02) 333-339
- 4 Endicott S, Haas DM. The current state of therapeutic drug trials in pregnancy. Clin PharmacolTher 2012; 92 (02) 149-150
- 5 National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993. Science and Technology. Pub L No. 103–43 (1993)
- 6 American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. Committee on ethics. Ethical considerations for including women as research participants. Published November 2015. Available at: https://www.acog.org/-/media/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Ethics/co646.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20161219T1058462179 . Accessed October 10, 2016
- 7 Anderson ML, Chiswell K, Peterson ED, Tasneem A, Topping J, Califf RM. Compliance with results reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (11) 1031-1039
- 8 Prayle AP, Hurley MN, Smyth AR. Compliance with mandatory reporting of clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional study. BMJ 2012; 344: d7373
- 9 United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Public Welfare. National Research Act.; 1974
- 10 Department of Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45: Public Welfare. Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects. Page 4. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/ohrp/policy/ohrpregulations.pdf . Published January 15, 2009. Accessed October 10, 2016
- 11 Public Law 110–85. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ85/pdf/PLAW-110publ85.pdf#page=82 . Published September 27, 2007. Accessed October 25, 2016
- 12 ClinicalTrials.gov. FDAAA 801 Requirements. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/manage-recs/fdaaa#WhoIsResponsibleForRegistering . Accessed October 25, 2016
- 13 ClinicalTrials.gov. Glossary of common site terms. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/info/glossary . Accessed November 11, 2016
- 14 Sheehan JR. Elaboration of definitions of responsible party and applicable clinical trial. Available at: https://prsinfo.clinicaltrials.gov/ElaborationsOnDefinitions.pdf . Published March 9, 2009. Accessed December 14, 2016
- 15 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drugs@FDA: FDA-approved drugs. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/ . Accessed October 25, 2016
- 16 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA 501k Pre-market notification database. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPMN/ . Accessed November 11, 2016
- 17 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA homepage for device approvals, denials, and clearance. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/default.htm . Accessed November 11, 2016
- 18 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Vaccines licensed for use in the United States. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm093833.htm . Accessed November 11, 2016
- 19 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Vaccines, blood & biologics. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/default.htm . Accessed November 11, 2016
- 20 Zarin DA, Tse T, Williams RJ, Carr S. Trial reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov. N Engl J Med 2016; 375 (20) 1998-2004
- 21 Hudson KL, Lauer MS, Collins FS. Toward a new era of trust and transparency in clinical trials. JAMA 2016; 316 (13) 1353-1354