Decision-Making Factors for Ulnar Nerve Transposition in Cubital Tunnel SurgeryFunding None.
22 February 2018
21 May 2018
02 July 2018 (online)
Background We designed a survey to ascertain the current perspectives of hand surgeons on the evaluation and management of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow. The secondary aim was to assess the concordance of hand surgeons on definitions of the terms “subluxated” and “dislocated” for classification of ulnar nerve instability.
Methods A questionnaire, including demographic practice variables, cubital tunnel practice patterns, preoperative imaging and electrodiagnostic evaluation, and a series of standardized intraoperative photographs of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow were developed and distributed to the current American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) membership.
Results A total of 690 (26.8%) members completed the survey; 84.2% of respondents indicated that they evaluate for ulnar nerve instability preoperatively with clinical examination, whereas only 6.1% indicated they routinely obtained dynamic ultrasound. Respondents indicated that the factors most strongly influencing their decision to proceed with anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve were subluxation on physical examination (89.6%), history consistent with ulnar nerve subluxation (85.8%), and muscle atrophy (43.2%). On review of clinical photographs, respondents demonstrated varying degrees of agreement on the terms “subluxated” or “dislocated” and recommendations for ulnar nerve transposition at intermediate degrees of ulnar nerve instability.
Conclusion ASSH members routinely evaluate for ulnar nerve instability with history and clinical examination without uniform use of preoperative ultrasound, and nearly half of the time the decision to transpose the ulnar nerve is made intraoperatively. Definitions for the degree of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow are not uniformly agreed upon, and further development of a classification system may be warranted to standardize treatment.
Keywordsanterior transposition of ulnar nerve - cubital tunnel syndrome - ulnar nerve instability - ulnar nerve - perspective of hand surgeons
- 1 Tang DT, Barbour JR, Davidge KM, Yee A, Mackinnon SE. Nerve entrapment: update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (01) 199e-215e
- 2 Dy CJ, Mackinnon SE. Ulnar neuropathy: evaluation and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2016; 9 (02) 178-184
- 3 Zhang D, Earp BE, Blazar P. Rates of complications and secondary surgeries after in situ cubital tunnel release compared with ulnar nerve transposition: a retrospective review. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (04) 294.e1-294.e5
- 4 Calfee RP, Manske PR, Gelberman RH, Van Steyn MO, Steffen J, Goldfarb CA. Clinical assessment of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: reliability of instability testing and the association of hypermobility with clinical symptoms. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (17) 2801-2808
- 5 Childress HM. Recurrent ulnar-nerve dislocation at the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1956; 38-A (05) 978-984
- 6 Richard MJ, Messmer C, Wray WH, Garrigues GE, Goldner RD, Ruch DS. Management of subluxating ulnar nerve at the elbow. Orthopedics 2010; 33 (09) 672
- 7 Okamoto M, Abe M, Shirai H, Ueda N. Morphology and dynamics of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel. Observation by ultrasonography. J Hand Surg [Br] 2000; 25 (01) 85-89
- 8 Posner MA. Compressive neuropathies of the ulnar nerve at the elbow and wrist. Instr Course Lect 2000; 49: 305-317
- 9 Assmus H, Antoniadis G, Bischoff C. , et al. Cubital tunnel syndrome - a review and management guidelines. Cent Eur Neurosurg 2011; 72 (02) 90-98
- 10 Ozturk E, Sonmez G, Çolak A. , et al. Sonographic appearances of the normal ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel. J Clin Ultrasound 2008; 36 (06) 325-329
- 11 Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R. , et al. Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. In: Padua L. , ed. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2016: 11
- 12 Macadam SA, Gandhi R, Bezuhly M, Lefaivre KA. Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (08) 1314.e1-1314.e12
- 13 Matzon JL, Lutsky KF, Hoffler CE, Kim N, Maltenfort M, Beredjiklian PK. Risk factors for ulnar nerve instability resulting in transposition in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (02) 180-183
- 14 Babusiaux D, Laulan J, Bouilleau L. , et al. Contribution of static and dynamic ultrasound in cubital tunnel syndrome. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014; 100 (4, Suppl): S209-S212
- 15 Draghi F, Bortolotto C. Importance of the ultrasound in cubital tunnel syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat 2016; 38 (02) 265-268
- 16 Gruber H, Glodny B, Peer S. The validity of ultrasonographic assessment in cubital tunnel syndrome: the value of a cubital-to-humeral nerve area ratio (CHR) combined with morphologic features. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36 (03) 376-382
- 17 Kowalska B. Assessment of the utility of ultrasonography with high-frequency transducers in the diagnosis of postoperative neuropathies. J Ultrason 2015; 15 (61) 151-163
- 18 Brauer CA, Graham B. The surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: a decision analysis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2007; 32 (06) 654-662
- 19 Bartels RH, Verhagen WI, van der Wilt GJ, Meulstee J, van Rossum LG, Grotenhuis JA. Prospective randomized controlled study comparing simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: part 1. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (03) 522-530
- 20 Biggs M, Curtis JA. Randomized, prospective study comparing ulnar neurolysis in situ with submuscular transposition. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (02) 296-304
- 21 Gervasio O, Gambardella G, Zaccone C, Branca D. Simple decompression versus anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in severe cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized study. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (01) 108-117
- 22 Yahya A, Malarkey AR, Eschbaugh RL, Bamberger HB. Trends in the surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome: a survey of members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Hand (NY) 2017; 1558944717725377
- 23 Owusu A, Mayeda B, Isaacs J. Surgeon perspectives on alternative nerve repair techniques. Hand (NY) 2014; 9 (01) 29-35