Am J Perinatol 2019; 36(09): 981-984
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675767
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?

Shontreal M. Cooper
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drexel College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Christina T. Blanchard
2   Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Jeffery M. Szychowski
2   Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Alan T. N. Tita
3   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

18 February 2018

01 October 2018

Publication Date:
26 November 2018 (online)

Abstract

Objective A high proportion of postcesarean wound complications occur after patients have been discharged from the hospital, increasing personal and health care costs. We undertook this study to evaluate the association between skin closure methods (suture vs. staple) following a cesarean delivery and the frequency of wound complications occurring after hospital discharge.

Study Design This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized trial in which women undergoing cesarean delivery at ≥24 weeks' gestation were randomized to receive metallic staples or subcuticular suture for skin closure after surgery. Staples were removed at the time of hospital discharge on postoperative days 3 to 4 for Pfannenstiel incisions or days 7 to 10 for vertical. The primary outcome for this analysis was any wound complication occurring after hospital discharge. Wound complications were infections or any wound disruption without infection (including seromas and hematomas). Associations were examined using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate, and multivariable logistic regression.

Results A total of 350 patients with follow-up through 4 to 6 weeks postpartum were included in the analysis: n = 171 received suture closure and n = 179 received staples. In the primary trial, wound complications occurred in 14.5% (n = 26) of individuals with staples and 5.9% (n = 10) with sutures (p = 0.008). Twenty-one (58.3%) of the 36 wound complications occurred after hospital discharge. The incidence of wound complications occurring after hospital discharge was 6.7% (n = 12) of patients receiving staples and 5.3% (n = 9) of those receiving sutures; p = 0.57; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 1.27 [0.55–2.95]). After multivariable adjustment, type of skin closure method was not associated with wound complication after discharge from the hospital (odds ratio: 1.29; 0.52–3.17).

Conclusion Although suture closure compared with staples was associated with fewer wound complications after cesarean delivery, we found no significant differences between closure types in the frequency of wound complications occurring after hospital discharge.

Condensation

This study evaluated skin closure method, staples versus subcuticular suture, following a cesarean delivery and determined its association with the frequency of wound complications after hospital discharge.


 
  • References

  • 1 Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Births - Method of Delivery. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/delivery.htm . Accessed February 13, 2017
  • 2 Hofmeyr GJ, Mathai M, Shah AN, Novikova N. Techniques for caesarean section (Protocol for a Cochrane Review). 2008. Available at: https://www.cochrane.org/CD004662/PREG_techniques-for-caesarean-section . Accessed July 2, 2019
  • 3 Owen J, Andrews WW. Wound complications after cesarean sections. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994; 37 (04) 842-855
  • 4 Nygaard IE, Squatrito RC. Abdominal incisions from creation to closure. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1996; 51 (07) 429-436
  • 5 Ramsey PS, White AM, Guinn DA. , et al. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (5 Pt 1): 967-973
  • 6 Mackeen D, Berghella V, Larsen ML. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (09) CD003577
  • 7 Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture. J Reprod Med 1997; 42 (10) 627-630
  • 8 Clay FS, Walsh CA, Walsh SR. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204 (05) 378-383
  • 9 Gaertner I, Burkhardt T, Beinder E. Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 138 (01) 29-33
  • 10 Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM. , et al. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (01) 33-38
  • 11 Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200 (03) 265.e1-265.e4
  • 12 Tuuli MG, Rampersad RM, Carbone JF, Stamilio D, Macones GA, Odibo AO. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117 (03) 682-690
  • 13 Zaki MN, Truong M, Pyra M, Kominiarek MA, Irwin T. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture. J Perinatol 2016; 36 (10) 819-822
  • 14 Olsen MA, Butler AM, Willers DM, Gross GA, Fraser VJ. Comparison of costs of surgical site infection and endometritis after cesarean delivery using claims and medical record data. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; 31 (08) 872-875