Jnl Wrist Surg 2019; 08(01): 066-071
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675791
Scientific Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Comparison of Direct Surgical Costs for Proximal Row Carpectomy and Four-Corner Arthrodesis

Nikolas H. Kazmers
1  Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Andrew R. Stephens
2  School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Angela P. Presson
3  Division of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
4  Department of Pediatric Research Enterprise, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Yizhe Xu
3  Division of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
4  Department of Pediatric Research Enterprise, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Ross J. Feller
1  Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Andrew R. Tyser
1  Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
› Author Affiliations
Funding One or more of the authors (A.P.P.) has received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the form of a grant—this investigation was supported by the University of Utah Study Design and Biostatistics Center, with funding in part from the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH, through Grant 5UL1TR001067–02 (formerly 8UL1TR000105 and UL1RR025764).
Further Information

Publication History

15 March 2018

24 September 2018

Publication Date:
16 November 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and four-corner arthrodesis (FCA) are common treatments for stage II scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrists, with similar functional and patient-reported outcomes reported in the peer-reviewed literature.

Questions Study questions included (1) whether surgical encounter total direct costs (SETDCs) differ between PRC and FCA, and (2) whether SETDC differs by method of fixation for FCA.

Patients and Methods Consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing PRC and FCA between July 2011 and May 2017 at a single tertiary care academic institution were identified. Patients undergoing additional simultaneous procedures were excluded. Using our institution's information technology value tools, we extracted prospectively collected cost data for each surgical encounter. SETDCs were compared between PRC and FCA, and between FCA subgroups (screws, plating, or staples).

Results Of 42 included patients, mean age was similar between the 23 PRC and 19 FCA patients (51.2 vs. 54.5 years, respectively). SETDCs were significantly greater for FCA than PRC by 425%. FCA involved significantly greater facility costs (2.3-fold), supply costs (10-fold), and operative time (121 vs. 57 minutes). Implant costs were absent for PRC, which were responsible for 55% of the SETDC for FCA. Compared with compression screws, plating and staple fixation were significantly more costly (70% and 240% greater, respectively).

Conclusion SETDCs were 425% greater for FCA than PRC. Implant costs for FCA alone were 130% greater than the entire surgical encounter for PRC. For FCA, SETDC varied depending on the method of fixation.

Level of Evidence This is a level III, cost analysis study.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by our university's Institutional Review Board.