Am J Perinatol 2019; 36(12): 1229-1236
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676536
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Health Care Professionals' Perceptions about Sensory-Based Interventions in the NICU

Roberta Pineda
1   Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
2   Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Jessica Roussin
1   Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Elizabeth Heiny
1   Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Joan Smith
3   Department of Quality, Safety and Practice Excellence, Saint Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study was supported by the University Research Strategic Alliance, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U54 HD087011, and the National Institute of Health Comprehensive Opportunities for Rehabilitation Research Training (CORRT) Grant (K12 HD055931).
Further Information

Publication History

24 May 2018

08 November 2018

Publication Date:
21 December 2018 (online)

Abstract

Objective The main objective of this article is to define perceptions of health care professionals regarding current use of sensory-based interventions in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Study Design A multidisciplinary group of NICU health care professionals (n = 108) defined the types of sensory-based interventions used in their NICU, the postmenstrual age (PMA) sensory-based interventions are administered, conditions under which sensory-based interventions are used, and personnel who administer sensory-based interventions.

Results The most commonly reported tactile intervention was infant holding (88% of respondents), the most common auditory intervention was recorded music/singing (69% of respondents), the most common kinesthetic intervention was occupational and physical therapy (85% of respondents), and the most common vestibular intervention was infant swings (86% of respondents). Tactile interventions were initiated most often at 24 to 26 weeks PMA (74% of respondents), auditory interventions at 30 to 32 weeks (60% of respondents), kinesthetic interventions at 30 to 32 weeks (76% of respondents), vestibular interventions at 33 to 34 weeks (86% of respondents), and visual interventions at 32 to 36 weeks (72% of respondents). Conditions under which sensory-based interventions were administered, and personnel who provided them, varied across settings.

Conclusion Varied use of sensory-based interventions in the NICU were reported. While this study was limited by biased sampling and the identification of health care professionals' perceptions but not real-world practice, this information can be used to build a comprehensive approach to positive sensory exposures in the NICU.

Supplementary Material

 
  • References

  • 1 Ryckman J, Hilton C, Rogers C, Pineda R. Sensory processing disorder in preterm infants during early childhood and relationships to early neurobehavior. Early Hum Dev 2017; 113: 18-22
  • 2 Anderson P, Doyle LW. ; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Neurobehavioral outcomes of school-age children born extremely low birth weight or very preterm in the 1990s. JAMA 2003; 289 (24) 3264-3272
  • 3 Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, Spencer-Smith MM, Roberts G, Doyle LW. ; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Attention problems in a representative sample of extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight children. Dev Neuropsychol 2011; 36 (01) 57-73
  • 4 Pineda RG, Tjoeng TH, Vavasseur C, Kidokoro H, Neil JJ, Inder T. Patterns of altered neurobehavior in preterm infants within the neonatal intensive care unit. J Pediatr 2013; 162 (03) 470-476
  • 5 Boyle EM, Poulsen G, Field DJ. , et al. Effects of gestational age at birth on health outcomes at 3 and 5 years of age: population based cohort study. BMJ 2012; 344: e896
  • 6 Bolisetty S, Dhawan A, Abdel-Latif M, Bajuk B, Stack J, Lui K. ; New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory Neonatal Intensive Care Units' Data Collection. Intraventricular hemorrhage and neurodevelopmental outcomes in extreme preterm infants. Pediatrics 2014; 133 (01) 55-62
  • 7 Smyser CD, Inder TE, Shimony JS. , et al. Longitudinal analysis of neural network development in preterm infants. Cereb Cortex 2010; 20 (12) 2852-2862
  • 8 Graven S, Browne J. Sensory development in the fetus, neonate, and infant: introduction and overview. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 2008; 8 (04) 169-172
  • 9 Lickliter R. The integrated development of sensory organization. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38 (04) 591-603
  • 10 Pineda R, Durant P, Mathur A, Inder T, Wallendorf M, Schlaggar BL. Auditory exposure in the neonatal intensive care unit: room type and other predictors. J Pediatr 2017; 183: 56-66
  • 11 Smith GC, Gutovich J, Smyser C. , et al. Neonatal intensive care unit stress is associated with brain development in preterm infants. Ann Neurol 2011; 70 (04) 541-549
  • 12 Lejeune F, Parra J, Berne-Audéoud F. , et al. Sound interferes with the early tactile manual abilities of preterm infants. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 23329
  • 13 Kuhn P, Zores C, Langlet C, Escande B, Astruc D, Dufour A. Moderate acoustic changes can disrupt the sleep of very preterm infants in their incubators. Acta Paediatr 2013; 102 (10) 949-954
  • 14 Cardoso SM, Kozlowski LC, Lacerda AB, Marques JM, Ribas A. Newborn physiological responses to noise in the neonatal unit. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2015; 81 (06) 583-588
  • 15 Lasky RE, Williams AL. Noise and light exposures for extremely low birth weight newborns during their stay in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (02) 540-546
  • 16 Liu WF, Laudert S, Perkins B, Macmillan-York E, Martin S, Graven S. ; NIC/Q 2005 Physical Environment Exploratory Group. The development of potentially better practices to support the neurodevelopment of infants in the NICU. J Perinatol 2007; 27 (Suppl. 02) S48-S74
  • 17 Pineda R, Guth R, Herring A, Reynolds L, Oberle S, Smith J. Enhancing sensory experiences for very preterm infants in the NICU: an integrative review. J Perinatol 2017; 37 (04) 323-332
  • 18 Vandenberg KA. Individualized developmental care for high risk newborns in the NICU: a practice guideline. Early Hum Dev 2007; 83 (07) 433-442
  • 19 Gonya J, Ray WC, Rumpf RW, Brock G. Investigating skin-to-skin care patterns with extremely preterm infants in the NICU and their effect on early cognitive and communication performance: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2017; 7 (03) e012985
  • 20 Bahman Bijari B, Iranmanesh S, Eshghi F, Baneshi MR. Gentle human touch and Yakson: the effect on preterm's behavioral reactions. ISRN Nurs 2012; 2012: 750363
  • 21 Asadollahi M, Jabraeili M, Mahallei M, Asgari Jafarabadi M, Ebrahimi S. Effects of gentle human touch and field massage on urine cortisol level in premature infants: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Caring Sci 2016; 5 (03) 187-194
  • 22 Loewy J, Stewart K, Dassler AM, Telsey A, Homel P. The effects of music therapy on vital signs, feeding, and sleep in premature infants. Pediatrics 2013; 131 (05) 902-918
  • 23 Schulzke SM, Kaempfen S, Trachsel D, Patole SK. Physical activity programs for promoting bone mineralization and growth in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (04) CD005387
  • 24 Graven SN, Browne JV. Auditory development in the fetus and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 2008; 8 (04) 187-193
  • 25 Fielder AR, Moseley MJ. Environmental light and the preterm infant. Semin Perinatol 2000; 24 (04) 291-298
  • 26 Riley L, Stark A, Kilpatrick S, Papile L. Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 7th edition. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012
  • 27 Morag I, Ohlsson A. Cycled light in the intensive care unit for preterm and low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (08) CD006982