CC BY 4.0 · Surg J (N Y) 2019; 05(01): e18-e24
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681063
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Impact of Interdisciplinary Education on Skills and Attitudes of Surgery and Emergency Medicine Residents

Anastasia Kunac
1   Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
Neil A. King
1   Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
Ilya Ostrovsky
1   Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
David Rytzarev
1   Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
Aziz M. Merchant
1   Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
Tiffany Murano
1   Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

18 November 2018

24 January 2019

Publication Date:
20 March 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background Interdisciplinary education (IDE) has been proposed as a means to improve patient safety by enhancing the performance of diverse health care teams. The improved camaraderie between members of different specialties may enhance communication and can foster a more supportive and positive work environment.

Objective This study was aimed to assess the effect of IDE on the procedural skills of general surgery (GS) and emergency medicine (EM), as well as the perceptions that GS and EM residents have of one another.

Methods EM and GS residents participated in two separate IDE sessions (4 months apart) designed to teach extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (e-FAST), tube thoracostomy, and complex wound closure. Surveys were administered to determine the effects that IDE had on confidence in performing bedside procedures, perceptions of IDE, and perceptions of one another's specialty. Survey responses were recorded using a 5-point Likert's scale.

Results Nine GS residents and 10 EM residents participated in the entire study. Significant improvements in the confidence levels of performing bedside procedures were noted among both groups of residents. We also report a significant improvement in the perceived respect and communication between EM and GS residents.

Conclusions Although further studies with a larger sample size are required, we have shown that IDE can improve the confidence levels of EM and GS residents in performing tube thoracostomy, e-FAST, and complex wound closure. These IDE sessions also improve the perceptions that the residents have of one another. IDE is a useful tool and may translate into improved consultation, collaboration, and patient care.

 
  • References

  • 1 Lingard L, Regehr G, Orser B. , et al. Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication. Arch Surg 2008; 143 (01) 12-17 , discussion 18
  • 2 Xyrichis A, Ream E. Teamwork: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2008; 61 (02) 232-241
  • 3 Lee RS, Woods R, Bullard M, Holroyd BR, Rowe BH. Consultations in the emergency department: a systematic review of the literature. Emerg Med J 2008; 25 (01) 4-9
  • 4 Woods RA, Lee R, Ospina MB. , et al. Consultation outcomes in the emergency department: exploring rates and complexity. CJEM 2008; 10 (01) 25-31
  • 5 Chan T, Bakewell F, Orlich D, Sherbino J. Conflict prevention, conflict mitigation, and manifestations of conflict during emergency department consultations. Acad Emerg Med 2014; 21 (03) 308-313
  • 6 Polavarapu HV, Kulaylat AN, Sun S, Hamed OH. 100 years of surgical education: the past, present, and future. Bull Am Coll Surg 2013; 98 (07) 22-27
  • 7 American Association of Colleges of Nursing. Interdisciplinary education and practice. Available from: https://www.aacnnursing.org/News-Information/Position-Statements-White-Papers/Interdisciplinary-Education-Practice . Accesses February 12, 2019
  • 8 Elston S, Holloway I. The impact of recent primary care reforms in the UK on interprofessional working in primary care centres. J Interprof Care 2001; 15 (01) 19-27