Download PDF
Semin Hear 2019; 40(02): 177-187
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1684046
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Ototoxicity: Visualized in Concept Maps

Kelly L. Watts
1   US Department of Defense Hearing Center of Excellence, San Antonio, Texas
2   Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory (NSMRL), Naval Submarine Base New London, Groton, Connecticut
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 April 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Ototoxicity refers to the damage to structures and function of the auditory-vestibular system caused by exogenous agents such as pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and ionizing radiation. There are many potentially ototoxic substances. For example, depending on how ototoxicity is defined, there are 200 to 600 medications that can cause damage to hearing and/or balance. Ototoxicity encompasses cochleotoxicity, vestibulotoxicity, and neurotoxicity. A variety of professional disciplines are involved in determining causation, prevention, and management of ototoxic effects. Research to identify and develop otoprotectants and otorescue agents is emerging and will translate basic scientific discovery into applications for use in hearing conservation programs, safety operations, and clinical care. Original concept maps are presented here to visually represent knowledge pathways, domains, and relationships essential to the understanding of ototoxicity.

Keywords

concept map - ototoxicity - ototoxins - ototoxicity monitoring

Disclaimers

The author currently serves as the cochair/administrator for the DoD HCE PIHL Ototoxicity Committee.


The author is a contractor, not a Federal employee. No financial conflicts of interest exist. The information presented and the opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Defense or the U.S. government.


 

  • References

  • 1 Prasher D, Morata T, Campo P. , et al. NoiseChem: an European Commission research project on the effects of exposure to noise and industrial chemicals on hearing and balance. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2002; 15 (01) 5-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kirchner DB, Evenson E, Dobie RA. , et al; ACOEM Task Force on Occupational Hearing Loss. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss: ACOEM task force on occupational hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med 2012; 54 (01) 106-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schaal NC, Slagley JM, Richburg CM, Zreiqat MM, Paschold HW. Chemical-induced hearing loss in shipyard workers. J Occup Environ Med 2018; 60 (01) e55-e62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Steyger PS, Cunningham LL, Esquivel CR, Watts KL, Zuo J. Editorial: cellular mechanisms of ototoxicity. Front Cell Neurosci 2018; 12: 75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ng SL. Theory and research in audiology education: understanding and representing complexity through informed methodological decisions. J Am Acad Audiol 2013; 24 (05) 344-353
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Novak JD, Cañas AJ. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006–01 Rev 01–2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition; 2008 . Available at: https://cmap.ihmc.us/docs/theory-of-concept-maps . Accessed October 8, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Novak JD. The promise of new ideas and new technology for improving teaching and learning. Cell Biol Educ 2003; 2 (02) 122-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mok CK, Whitehill TL, Dodd BJ. Problem-based learning, critical thinking and concept mapping in speech-language pathology education: a review. Int J Speech-Language Pathol 2008; 10 (06) 438-448
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Daley BJ, Torre DM. Concept maps in medical education: an analytical literature review. Med Educ 2010; 44 (05) 440-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cañas AJ, Novak JD, Reiska P. How good is my concept map? Am I a good Cmapper?. Knowledge Manage E-Learning 2015; 7: 6-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Trochim W, Kane M. Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. Int J Qual Health Care 2005; 17 (03) 187-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Detaille SI, Haafkens JA, van Dijk FJ. What employees with rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus and hearing loss need to cope at work. Scand J Work Environ Health 2003; 29 (02) 134-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Poost-Foroosh L, Jennings MB, Shaw L, Meston CN, Cheesman MF. Factors in client-clinician interaction that influence hearing aid adoption. Trends Amplif 2011; 15 (03) 127-139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Poost-Foroosh L, Jennings MB, Cheesman MF. Comparisons of client and clinician views of the importance of factors in client-clinician interaction in hearing aid purchase decisions. J Am Acad Audiol 2015; 26 (03) 247-259
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bennett RJ, Laplante-Lévesque A, Meyer CJ, Eikelboom RH. Exploring hearing aid problems: Perspectives of hearing aid owners and clinicians. Ear Hear 2018; 39 (01) 172-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bennett RJ, Meyer CJ, Eikelboom RH, Atlas MD. Investigating the knowledge, skills, and tasks required for hearing aid management: perspectives of clinicians and hearing aid owners. Am J Audiol 2018; 27 (01) 67-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bennett RJ, Laplante-Lévesque A, Eikelboom RH. How do hearing aid owners respond to hearing aid problems?. Ear Hear 2019; 40 (01) 77-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Burke JG, O'Campo P, Peak GL, Gielen AC, McDonnell KA, Trochim WM. An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method. Qual Health Res 2005; 15 (10) 1392-1410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 de Oliveira JAA. Audiovestibular toxicity of drugs. Volume II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc.; 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Roland PS, Rutka JA. Ototoxicity. 1st ed. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: BC Decker; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Campbell KCM. Pharmacology and Ototoxicity for Audiologists. 1st ed. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Henderson D, Salvi RJ, Quaranta A, McFadden SL, Burkard RF. Ototoxicity: basic science and clinical applications. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999. Available at: https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/17496632/1999/884/1 . Accessed March 19, 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Steyger PS, Cunningham L, Zuo J, Watts KL, Esquivel CR. Cellular mechanisms of ototoxicity. Front Cell Neurosci; 2018. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/5317/cellular-mechanisms-of-ototoxicity . Accessed October 8, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Boudin-George A, Brewer C. Ototoxicity – Special topics in clinical monitoring. Int J Audiol 2018; 57: S4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Watts K. Introduction to the PIHL Committees: Ototoxicity Committee. In: Pharmaceutical Interventions for Hearing Loss (PIHL) Newsletter – Winter 2018/Edition 7; 5–6. US Department of Defense Hear Center of Excel. Available at: https://hearing.health.mil/Research/PIHL-Working-Group/PIHL-Newsletters . Accessed October 16, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cannizzaro E, Cannizzaro C, Plescia F. , et al. Exposure to ototoxic agents and hearing loss: a review of current knowledge. Hear Balance Commun 2014; 12: 166-175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Preventing hearing loss caused by chemical (ototoxicity) and noise exposure. SHIB 03–08–2018. DHHS (NIOSH). Publication No. 2018–124. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2018-124/pdfs/2018-124.pdf . Accessed October 8, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 American Speech-Language Hearing Association. Guidelines for the audiologic management of individuals receiving cochleotoxic drug therapy. Amer Speech Lang Hrg Assn 1994; 36: 11-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cianfrone G, Pentangelo D, Cianfrone F. , et al. Pharmacological drugs inducing ototoxicity, vestibular symptoms and tinnitus: a reasoned and updated guide. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2011; 15 (06) 601-636
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Morata TC. Chemical exposure as a risk factor for hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med 2003; 45 (07) 676-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Steyger PS. Potentiation of chemical ototoxicity by noise. Semin Hear 2009; 30 (01) 38-46
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Guthrie OW, Wong BA, McInturf SM, Reboulet JE, Ortiz PA, Mattie DR. Background noise contributes to organic solvent induced brain dysfunction. Neural Plast 2016; 2016: 8742725
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Zimmerman E, Lahav A. Ototoxicity in preterm infants: effects of genetics, aminoglycosides, and loud environmental noise. J Perinatol 2013; 33 (01) 3-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Garinis AC, Kemph A, Tharpe AM, Weitkamp JH, McEvoy C, Steyger PS. Monitoring neonates for ototoxicity. Int J Audiol 2018; 57 (Suppl. 04) S41-S48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Chen Y, Huang WG, Zha DJ. , et al. Aspirin attenuates gentamicin ototoxicity: from the laboratory to the clinic. Hear Res 2007; 226 (1-2): 178-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Zimmermann P, Curtis N. The effect of aspirin on antibiotic susceptibility. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2018; 22 (11) 967-972
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ganesan P, Schmiedge J, Manchaiah V, Swapna S, Dhandayutham S, Kothandaraman PP. Ototoxicity: a challenge in diagnosis and treatment. J Audiol Otol 2018; 22 (02) 59-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 American Academy of Audiology. Position statement and clinical practice guidelines: Ototoxicity monitoring. 2009. Available at: https://www.audiology.org/publications-resources/document-library/ototoxicity-monitoring . Accessed October 9, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 World Health Organization. 10 facts about deafness. Updated March 2018 . Available at: http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/deafness/en/ . Accessed October 9, 2018
    PubMed
  • 40 Wium A, Gerber B. Ototoxicity management: an investigation into doctors' knowledge and practices, and the roles of audiologists in a tertiary hospital. S Afr J Commun Disord 2016; 63 (01) e1-e15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Khoza-Shangase K. Risk versus benefit: who assesses this in the management of patients on ototoxic drugs?. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2017; 9 (03) 171-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Konrad-Martin D, Poling GL, Garinis AC. , et al. Applying U.S. national guidelines for ototoxicity monitoring in adult patients: perspectives on patient populations, service gaps, barriers and solutions. Int J Audiol 2018; 57 (Suppl. 04) S3-S18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Crundwell G, Gomersall P, Baguley DM. Ototoxicity (cochleotoxicity) classifications: a review. Int J Audiol 2016; 55 (02) 65-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 King KA, Brewer CC. Clinical trials, ototoxicity grading scales and the audiologist's role in therapeutic decision making. Int J Audiol 2018; 57 (Suppl. 04) S89-S98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Handelsman JA. Vestibulotoxicity: strategies for clinical diagnosis and rehabilitation. Int J Audiol 2018; 57 (Suppl. 04) S99-S107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar