Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Time from Regional Anesthesia Placement to Delivery for Cesarean DeliveryFunding None.
21 March 2019
17 June 2019
25 July 2019 (online)
Objective Our objective was to evaluate the impact of a quality improvement (QI) initiative on the regional anesthesia placement-to-infant delivery time during cesarean delivery (CD).
Study Design We performed a quality improvement trial. Before June 18, 2018, the preoperative protocol was as follows: the anesthesiologist administered regional anesthesia in the operating room then the nurse placed the Foley's catheter, clipped pubic hair, precleaned the abdomen, and abdominal preparation. On June 18, 2018, the protocol changed and all the preoperative preparation (Foley's clip and preclean) were performed prior to the arrival in the operating room. The records of patients who underwent scheduled or nonemergency CD between May 1 and July 15, 2018, were reviewed. Our primary outcome was time between the placements of regional anesthesia to infant delivery at the time of CD. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed.
Results A total of 194 patients were included, 124 before and 70 after the process change. The change in process leads to a significant reduction in anesthesia-to-delivery time, even after adjusting for number of prior CD and body mass index (BMI). Other times were also significantly impacted by the change.
Conclusion Our QI initiative significantly decreased the time from anesthesia placement to delivery of the fetus. Performing preoperative preparation activities, such as Foley's placement and shaving, after regional anesthesia for CD, increase the risk of fetal exposure to maternal hypotension. We evaluated the impact of a QI initiative on regional anesthesia placement to infant delivery time during CD.
- 1 Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in Caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One 2016; 11 (02) e0148343
- 2 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2016. National Vital Statistics System. 2018; 67 (01) 1-55
- 3 Littleford J. Effects on the fetus and newborn of maternal analgesia and anesthesia: a review. Can J Anaesth 2004; 51 (06) 586-609
- 4 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no. 177: obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129 (04) e73-e89
- 5 Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL. , et al, eds. Maternal Physiology. In: Williams Obstetrics. 25th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2018
- 6 Lee A, Ngan Kee WD, Gin T. A quantitative, systematic review of randomized controlled trials of ephedrine versus phenylephrine for the management of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2002; 94 (04) 920-926
- 7 Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, Middleton P, Simmons SW. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (04) CD002251
- 8 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 116: Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (05) 1232-1240
- 9 Datta S, Brown Jr WU. Acid-base status in diabetic mothers and their infants following general or spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1977; 47 (03) 272-276
- 10 Marx GF, Cosmi EV, Wollman SB. Biochemical status and clinical condition of mother and infant at cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1969; 48 (06) 986-994
- 11 Doherty DA, Magann EF, Chauhan SP, O'Boyle AL, Busch JM, Morrison JC. Factors affecting caesarean operative time and the effect of operative time on pregnancy outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48 (03) 286-291
- 12 Edwards RK, Cantu J, Cliver S, Biggio Jr. JR, Owen J, Tita AT. The association of maternal obesity with fetal pH and base deficit at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (2, Pt. 1): 262-267
- 13 Girsen AI, Osmundson SS, Naqvi M, Garabedian MJ, Lyell DJ. Body mass index and operative times at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (04) 684-689
- 14 Butwick A, Carvalho B, Danial C, Riley E. Retrospective analysis of anesthetic interventions for obese patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. J Clin Anesth 2010; 22 (07) 519-526
- 15 Conner SN, Tuuli MG, Longman RE, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Impact of obesity on incision-to-delivery interval and neonatal outcomes at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (04) 386.e1-386.e6