J Wrist Surg 2020; 09(05): 411-416
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712981
Scientific Article

Ulnar Head or Total Distal Radioulnar Joint Replacement, Isolated and Combined with Total Wrist Arthroplasty: Midterm Results

1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hand Surgery Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
,
Michel Boeckstyns
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Section of Hand Surgery, Capio/CFR Hospital in Hellerup, Hellerup, Denmark
,
Søren Merser
3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose Various implants have been described for ulnar head replacement (UHR) or for total replacement of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). Many series are small and few reports on mid- or long-term results. This study is primarily aimed to report on the midterm results after ulnar head only and total DRUJ replacement using the uHead in the treatment of painful disorders of the DRUJ. The secondary aim of the study was to eventually assess the combination of UHR and total wrist arthroplasty (TWA).

Materials and Methods We included 20 consecutive patients in whom an UHR with the uHead was performed at our institution between February 2005 and March 2017. There were 6 men and 14 women with mean age of 59 years (range: 36–80 years). The mean follow-up time was 5 years (range: 2–15 years). Data were recorded prospectively before operation and at follow-up examinations and entered in a registry. The patients were followed-up at 3 and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and thereafter annually. In five cases, the uHead was implanted simultaneously with a Remotion TWA. In four cases, a Remotion TWA had been implanted previously. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of remaining free of revision. A nonparametric Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used for comparing data not normally distributed (qDASH [quick disabilities of the hand, shoulder, and arm] scores), and the paired parametric Student's t-test was used for normally distributed data (pain and visual analogue scale [VAS] scores, range of motion, and grip strength). Significance was set at a p-value of less than 0.05.

Results Pain, grip strength, and the function improved significantly. Pain after surgery decreased with 50 points on the VAS score scale of 100, from 66 (mean), preoperatively (range: 16–97) to 16 (mean; range: 0–51), postoperatively, while grip strength nearly doubled from 12 KgF (mean; range: 4–22), before to 21 KgF (mean; range: 6–36), after the surgery. Patients function measured with qDASH scores improved from 56 (mean; range: 36–75), preoperatively to 19 (mean; range: 4–47), postoperatively. Wrist extension, flexion, and ulnar and radial deviation did not change to a clinically or statistically significant extend, neither did supination nor pronation improved after surgery. While three UHRs were revised early because of pain problems and/or unsatisfactory forearm rotation in two cases and infection in one, 17 had an uncomplicated postoperative course and these patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery at all the follow-ups. Due to limited number of cases, the calculation of significance in comparing combined cases with UHR only cases was abandoned.

Conclusion Ulnar head arthroplasty (uHead) showed significant improvement in pain, grip strength, and the function of the patients with a painful disability of the DRUJ, without impairment on mobility on the midterm follow-up. The overall implant survival over the time and the complication rate was acceptable.



Publication History

Received: 27 March 2020

Accepted: 28 April 2020

Article published online:
12 June 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 
  • References

  • 1 van Schoonhoven J, Fernandez DL, Bowers WH, Herbert TJ. Salvage of failed resection arthroplasties of the distal radioulnar joint using a new ulnar head prosthesis. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25 (03) 438-446
  • 2 Herbert TJ, van Schoonhoven J. Ulnar head replacement. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2007; 11 (01) 98-108
  • 3 van Schoonhoven J, Mühldorfer-Fodor M, Fernandez DL, Herbert TJ. Salvage of failed resection arthroplasties of the distal radioulnar joint using an ulnar head prosthesis: long-term results. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (07) 1372-1380
  • 4 Cooney WP, Berger RA. Distal radioulnar joint implant arthroplasty. J Am Soc Surg Hand 2005; 5: 217-231
  • 5 Willis AA, Berger RA, Cooney III WP. Arthroplasty of the distal radioulnar joint using a new ulnar head endoprosthesis: preliminary report. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (02) 177-189
  • 6 Scheker LR, Babb BA, Killion PE. Distal ulnar prosthetic replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 2001; 32 (02) 365-376 , x
  • 7 Laurentin-Pérez LA, Goodwin AN, Babb BA, Scheker LR. A study of functional outcomes following implantation of a total distal radioulnar joint prosthesis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008; 33 (01) 18-28
  • 8 Savvidou C, Murphy E, Mailhot E, Jacob S, Scheker LR. Semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint prosthesis. J Wrist Surg 2013; 2 (01) 41-48
  • 9 Schuurman AH. A new distal radioulnar joint prosthesis. J Wrist Surg 2013; 2 (04) 359-362
  • 10 Garcia-Elias M. Eclypse: partial ulnar head replacement for the isolated distal radio-ulnar joint arthrosis. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2007; 11 (01) 121-128
  • 11 Bigorre N, Saint Cast Y, Cesari B, Rabarin F, Raimbeau G. Intermediate term evaluation of the Eclypse distal radio-ulnar prosthesis for rheumatoid arthritis. A report of five cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016; 102 (03) 345-349
  • 12 Ewald TJ, Skeete K, Moran SL. Preliminary experience with a new total distal radioulnar joint replacement. J Wrist Surg 2012; 1 (01) 23-30
  • 13 Yen Shipley N, Dion GR, Bowers WH. Ulnar head implant arthroplasty: an intermediate term review of 1 surgeon's experience. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2009; 13 (03) 160-164
  • 14 Warwick D, Shyamalan G, Balabanidou E. Indications and early to mid-term results of ulnar head replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013; 95 (06) 427-432
  • 15 Herzberg G. Periprosthetic bone resorption and sigmoid notch erosion around ulnar head implants: a concern?. Hand Clin 2010; 26 (04) 573-577
  • 16 Axelsson P, Sollerman C, Kärrholm J. Ulnar head replacement: 21 cases; mean follow-up, 7.5 years. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (09) 1731-1738
  • 17 Kaiser GL, Bodell LS, Berger RA. Functional outcomes after arthroplasty of the distal radioulnar joint and hand therapy: a case series. J Hand Ther 2008; 21 (04) 398-409
  • 18 Kakar S, Swann RP, Perry KI, Wood-Wentz CM, Shin AY, Moran SL. Functional and radiographic outcomes following distal ulna implant arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (07) 1364-1371
  • 19 Sauerbier M, Arsalan-Werner A, Enderle E, Vetter M, Vonier D. Ulnar head replacement and related biomechanics. J Wrist Surg 2013; 2 (01) 27-32
  • 20 Sabo MT, Talwalkar S, Hayton M, Watts A, Trail IA, Stanley JK. Intermediate outcomes of ulnar head arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (12) 2405-11.e1
  • 21 Calcagni M, Giesen T. Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty with implants: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2017; 1 (05) 191-196
  • 22 Moulton LS, Giddins GEB. Distal radio-ulnar implant arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017; 42 (08) 827-838
  • 23 Rampazzo A, Gharb BB, Brock G, Scheker LR. Functional outcomes of the aptis-scheker distal radioulnar joint replacement in patients under 40 years old. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (07) 1397-1403.e3