Download PDF
J Hand Microsurg 2022; 14(01): 64-70
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713072
Original Article

Management of Fingertip Injuries: A Survey of Opinions of Surgeons Worldwide

Hannah Jia Hui Ng 
1   Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore
,
Jing Yuan
1   Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore
,
Vaikunthan Rajaratnam
1   Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Fingertip injuries are common injuries in all ages. There is currently no consensus nor evidence to support the use of any one treatment, with numerous options available for management. The aim is to review the consensus for treatment of fingertip injuries among surgeons worldwide.

Materials and Methods Nonprobability judgment sampling using purposive method was performed on surgeons (n = 65) using two digital platforms of the community of practice of hand surgeons. Three illustrative case scenarios were presented to the participants to understand their consensus on treating fingertip injuries, and their choice of treatment for themselves with a similar injury.

Results This survey demonstrates that there is a wide range of treatment preferences for fingertip injuries for each clinical scenario. In Allen 1 and in crush injuries, most respondents favored healing by secondary intention (66.2 and 92.3%, respectively). In Allen 3 injuries, 72.3% favored surgical intervention. In all clinical scenarios, most surgeons would want their own fingertip injuries treated identically to how they would treat patients with similar fingertip injuries (93.9, 96.9, and 95.4%, respectively). Furthermore, our study demonstrated experience in surgery was not associated with treatment preferences.

Conclusion Management of fingertip injuries remains controversial, but this study is suggestive that treatment preferences may not be determinant on patient factors, given that all of our respondents are highly functioning individuals who practice microsurgery, but most chose to administer the same treatment to patients as they would to themselves.

Keywords

fingertip - preferences - treatment


Publication History

Article published online:
09 June 2020

© 2020. Society of Indian Hand & Microsurgeons. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Cohen MS. Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Yorlets RR, Busa K, Eberlin KR. et al. Fingertip injuries in children: epidemiology, financial burden, and implications for prevention. Hand (N Y) 2017; 12 (04) 342-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hirasé Y. Postoperative cooling enhances composite graft survival in nasal-alar and fingertip reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1993; 46 (08) 707-711
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC. et al. Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients’ preferences. Med Care 2001; 39 (03) 206-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Birkmeyer JD, Reames BN, McCulloch P, Carr AJ, Campbell WB, Wennberg JE. Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery. Lancet 2013; 382 (9898) 1121-1129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tang JB, Elliot D, Adani R, Saint-Cyr M, Stang F. Repair and reconstruction of thumb and finger tip injuries: a global view. Clin Plast Surg 2014; 41 (03) 325-359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sindhu K, DeFroda SF, Harris AP, Gil JA. Management of partial fingertip amputation in adults: operative and nonoperative treatment. Injury 2017; 48 (12) 2643-2649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bickel KD, Dosanjh A. Fingertip reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (08) 1417-1419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Panattoni JB, De Ona IR, Ahmed MM. Reconstruction of fingertip injuries: surgical tips and avoiding complications. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (05) 1016-1024
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Söderberg T, Nyström A, Hallmans G, Hultén J. Treatment of fingertip amputations with bone exposure. A comparative study between surgical and conservative treatment methods. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 17 (02) 147-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Braun M, Horton RC, Snelling CF. Fingertip amputation: review of 100 digits. Can J Surg 1985; 28 (01) 72-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wang K, Sears ED, Shauver MJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of outcomes of revision amputation treatment for fingertip amputations. Hand (N Y) 2013; 8 (02) 139-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ipsen T, Frandsen PA, Barfred T. Conservative treatment of fingertip injuries. Injury 1987; 18 (03) 203-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Chow SP, Ho E. Open treatment of fingertip injuries in adults. J Hand Surg Am 1982; 7 (05) 470-476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Louis DS, Palmer AK, Burney RE. Open treatment of digital tip injuries. JAMA 1980; 244 (07) 697-698
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Matsumoto MK, Fernandes M, de VY Moraes, Raduan J, Okamura A, Belloti JC. Treatment of fingertip injuries by specialists in hand surgery in Brazil. Acta Ortop Bras 2018; 26 (05) 294-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Miller AJ, Rivlin M, Kirkpatrick W, Abboudi J, Jones C. Fingertip amputation treatment: a survey study. Am J Orthop 2015; 44 (09) E331-E339
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 van den Berg WB, Vergeer RA, van der Sluis CK, Ten Duis H-J, Werker PMN. Comparison of three types of treatment modalities on the outcome of fingertip injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 72 (06) 1681-1687
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Krauss EM, Lalonde DH. ary healing of fingertip amputations: a review. Hand (N Y) 2014; 9 (03) 282-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Quadlbauer S, Pezzei C, Jurkowitsch J. et al. [The semi-occlusive dressing in treating Allen III and IV fingertip injuries as an alternative to local skin flaps]. Unfallchirurg 2017; 120 (11) 961-968
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Janssen SJ, Teunis T, Guitton TG, Ring D. Science of Variation Group. Do surgeons treat their patients like they would treat themselves?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (11) 3564-3572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Montgomery AA, Fahey T. How do patients’ treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians. ? Qual Health Care 2001; 10 (Suppl. 01) i39-i43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Döring A-CD, Hageman MGJS, Mulder FJ, Guitton TG, Ring D. Science of Variation Group. Science of Variation Group Trigger finger: assessment of surgeon and patient preferences and priorities for decision making. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (11) 2208-2213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ubel PA, Angott AM, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Physicians recommend different treatments for patients than they would choose for themselves. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171 (07) 630-634
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Sarr B, Fagerlin A, Ubel PA. A matter of perspective: choosing for others differs from choosing for yourself in making treatment decisions. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21 (06) 618-622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kirkpatrick JN, Mahowald MB. Golden rule reasoning in clinical medicine: theoretical and empirical aspects. J Clin Ethics 2004; 15 (03) 250-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Jonas E, Schulz-Hardt S, Frey D. Giving advice or making decisions in someone else’s place: the influence of impression, defense, and accuracy motivation on the search for new information. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2005; 31 (07) 977-990
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Vranceanu A-M, Cooper C, Ring D. Integrating patient values into evidence-based practice: effective communication for shared decision-making. Hand Clin 2009; 25 (01) 83-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kray L, Gonzalez R. Differential weighting in choice versus advice: I’ll do this, you do that. J Behav Decis Making 1999; 12 (03) 207-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Batteux E, Ferguson E, Tunney RJ. Exploring how accountability affects the medical decisions we make for other people. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar