Diagnostic Yield of Multiplex PCR Method in Cerebrospinal Fluid for the Diagnosis of Purulent Meningitis in Children

Jing-Li Zhao; Chun-Zhen Hua; Yong-Ping Xie; Yan-Xiang Pan; Bo-Fei Hu; Wei-Jian Wang; Xiu He

doi:10.1055/s-0040-1719163

Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Inhaltsverzeichnis

J Pediatr Infect Dis 2021; 16(01): 012-017
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719163

Original Article

Diagnostic Yield of Multiplex PCR Method in Cerebrospinal Fluid for the Diagnosis of Purulent Meningitis in Children

Authors

Jing-Li Zhao

¹Department of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China

²Department of Nephrology, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
Chun-Zhen Hua

¹Department of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
Yong-Ping Xie

¹Department of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
Yan-Xiang Pan

³Department of Clinical Laboratory Center, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
Bo-Fei Hu

¹Department of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
Wei-Jian Wang

⁴Department of Research and Development, Health Gene Technologies Co., Ltd., Ningbo, Zhejiang, P.R. China
Xiu He

⁵Department of Marketing,r Health Gene Technologies Co., Ltd., Ningbo, Zhejiang, P.R. China

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic yield of the multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for the diagnosis of purulent meningitis (PM) in children.

Methods PM was diagnosed according to the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guideline (2016). Patients with PM between May 2015 and October 2018 were included. The multiplex PCR method was used to detect eight common identified bacteria in PM. Its sensitivity and specificity were compared with bacteria culture.

Results A total of 106 cases were enrolled. Pathogenic bacteria were identified in 27 (25.5%) cases by culture and in 37 (34.9%) cases by multiplex PCR assay. The top three bacteria were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli K1, and Streptococcus agalactiae. When using culture as the gold standard, the multiplex PCR assay showed a sensitivity of 100, 88.9, and 75.0% for S. agalactiae, S. pneumoniae, and E. coli K1, respectively, and a specificity of more than 91.3% for all three bacteria. For detectable bacteria, the positive rate of the multiplex PCR assay (36.6%, 37/101) was significantly higher than that of the bacteria culture (21.8%, 22/101). When combining the two methods, etiology was identified in 42.5% (45/106) of the patients.

Conclusion Streptococcus pneumoniae, E. coli K1, and S. agalactiae were the predominant pathogens causing pediatric PM. As a rapid method with high sensitivity and specificity, the multiplex PCR assay in CSF could be used as an adjunctive approach with bacteria culture for the pathogen identification of PM.

Keywords

purulent meningitis - multiplex PCR - pathogen - pediatric - cerebrospinal fluid

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Harrison LH, Trotter CL, Ramsay ME. Global epidemiology of meningococcal disease. Vaccine 2009; 27 (Suppl. 02) B51-B63
2 Thaver D, Zaidi AK. Burden of neonatal infections in developing countries: a review of evidence from community-based studies. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009; 28 (01) S3-S9
3 Chauhan D, Mokta K, Kanga A, Grover N. Epidemiology, clinical profile and role of rapid tests in the diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis in children (aged 1-59 months). Neurol India 2018; 66 (04) 1045-1049
4 Li Y, Yin Z, Shao Z. Acute Meningitis and Encephalitis Syndrome Study Group. et al. Population-based surveillance for bacterial meningitis in China, September 2006-December 2009. Emerg Infect Dis 2014; 20 (01) 61-69
5 Agrawal S, Nadel S. Acute bacterial meningitis in infants and children: epidemiology and management. Paediatr Drugs 2011; 13 (06) 385-400
6 Edmond K, Clark A, Korczak VS, Sanderson C, Griffiths UK, Rudan I. Global and regional risk of disabling sequelae from bacterial meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2010; 10 (05) 317-328
7 van de Beek D. Progress and challenges in bacterial meningitis. Lancet 2012; 380 (9854): 1623-1624
8 Leber AL, Everhart K, Balada-Llasat JM. et al. Multicenter evaluation of BioFire FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel for detection of bacteria, viruses, and yeast in cerebrospinal fluid specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2016; 54 (09) 2251-2261
9 Graf EH, Farquharson MV, Cárdenas AM. Comparative evaluation of the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis molecular panel in a pediatric population. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2017; 87 (01) 92-94
10 van de Beek D, Cabellos C, Dzupova O. ESCMID Study Group for Infections of the Brain (ESGIB). et al. ESCMID guideline: diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016; 22 (Suppl. 03) S37-S62
11 Long F, Kong M, Wu S. et al. Development and validation of an advanced fragment analysis-based assay for the detection of 22 pathogens in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with meningitis and encephalitis. J Clin Lab Anal 2019; 33 (03) e22707
12 Takhar SS, Ting SA, Camargo Jr CA, Pallin DJ. U.S. emergency department visits for meningitis, 1993-2008. Acad Emerg Med 2012; 19 (06) 632-639
13 George BP, Schneider EB, Venkatesan A. Encephalitis hospitalization rates and inpatient mortality in the United States, 2000-2010. PLoS One 2014; 9 (09) e104169
14 Nigrovic LE, Fine AM, Monuteaux MC, Shah SS, Neuman MI. Trends in the management of viral meningitis at United States children's hospitals. Pediatrics 2013; 131 (04) 670-676
15 Afifi S, Wasfy MO, Azab MA. et al. Laboratory-based surveillance of patients with bacterial meningitis in Egypt (1998-2004). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2007; 26 (05) 331-340
16 Brouwer MC, Tunkel AR, van de Beek D. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and antimicrobial treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23 (03) 467-492
17 Wootton SH, Aguilera E, Salazar L, Hemmert AC, Hasbun R. Enhancing pathogen identification in patients with meningitis and a negative Gram stain using the BioFire FilmArray(®) Meningitis/Encephalitis panel. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2016; 15: 26
18 Soucek DK, Dumkow LE, VanLangen KM, Jameson AP. Cost justification of the BioFire FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel versus standard of care for diagnosing meningitis in a community hospital. J Pharm Pract 2019; 32 (01) 36-40
19 Du B, Hua C, Xia Y. et al. Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel for the detection of bacteria and yeast in Chinese children. Ann Transl Med 2019; 7 (18) 437
20 Qazi SA, Khan MA, Mughal N. et al. Dexamethasone and bacterial meningitis in Pakistan. Arch Dis Child 1996; 75 (06) 482-488
21 Seth R, Murthy PSR, Sistla S, Subramanian M, Tamilarasu K. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of acute pyogenic meningitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae type b and Neisseria meningitidis using a multiplex PCR assay. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11 (09) FC01-FC04
22 Le Saux N. Canadian Paediatric Society, Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee. Guidelines for the management of suspected and confirmed bacterial meningitis in Canadian children older than one month of age. Paediatr Child Health 2014; 19 (03) 141-152
23 Lee CK, Chiu L, Yan G. et al. False negative results caused by erroneous automated result interpretation algorithm on the FilmArray 2.0 instrument. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018; 56 (02) e43-e45