PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Surg J (N Y) 2021; 07(01): e22-e25
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722175
Original Article

Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Routine versus Selective Histological Examination After Cholecystectomy

Andrew Alabi 
1   Department of Surgery, West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
A D. Arvind 
2   School of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
,
Nikhil Pawa
1   Department of Surgery, West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Shakir Karim
3   Department of Histopathology, West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Jason Smith
1   Department of Surgery, West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
› Institutsangaben Funding There is no funding or sponsorship for this article.
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Incidental gallbladder cancer is relatively rare, with an incidence ranging between 0.19 and 5.5% of all the cholecystectomies for benign disease, and carries a poor prognosis. Currently, in the literature, there appears to be some controversy about whether all gallbladder specimens should be sent for routine histopathology. The aim of this study was to investigate the need for either routine or selective histopathological evaluation of all gallbladder specimens following cholecystectomy in our institution.

Methods The records of all patients who underwent a cholecystectomy (laparoscopic and open) for gallstone disease over a 5-year period (between January 2011 and January 2016) were reviewed retrospectively in a single university teaching hospital. Patients with radiological evidence of gallbladder cancer preoperatively were excluded. The notes of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer were reviewed and data were collected for clinical presentation and preoperative investigations including blood tests and radiological imaging.

Results A total of 1,473 specimens were sent for histopathological evaluation, with two patients being diagnosed with an incidental gallbladder cancer (papillary adenocarcinoma in situ and moderately differentiated invasive adenocarcinoma [stage IIIa]). The incidence rate was 0.14%. All patients with incidental gallbladder cancer had macroscopically abnormal specimens.

Conclusion Both patients in our study who were diagnosed with incidental gallbladder cancer had macroscopic abnormalities. A selective rather than routine approach to histological evaluation of gallbladder specimens especially in those with macroscopic abnormalities should be employed. This will reduce the burden on the pathology department with potential cost savings.

Keywords

cholecystectomy - histology - incidental gallbladder cancer

Note

The study has been approved by me and my coauthors, as well as by the responsible authorities at the hospital in which this work has been performed. I certify that none of the material has been published previously and is not currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. The coauthors (A. D. A., N. P., S. K., and J. S.) confirm that they qualify for coauthorship according to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts published in the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors in 1988.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 25. Juli 2019

Angenommen: 16. September 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Februar 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Halldestam I, Enell EL, Kullman E, Borch K. Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones. Br J Surg 2004; 91 (06) 734-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Connor S, Garden OJ. Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2006; 93 (02) 158-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Elwood DR. Cholecystitis. Surg Clin North Am 2008; 88 (06) 1241-1252 , viii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cancer Research UK. Gallbladder cancer incidence statistics. . Available at: Accessed May 20, 2019 http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/gallbladder-cancer/incidence#heading-Zero
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Levy AD, Murakata LA, Rohrmann Jr CA. Gallbladder carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2001; 21 (02) 295-314 , questionnaire 549–55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sujata J, Rana S, Khan S, Hassan MJ, Jairajpuri ZS. Incidental gall bladder carcinoma in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of 6 cases and a review of the literature. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7 (01) 85-88
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Antonakis P, Alexakis N, Mylonaki D. et al. Incidental finding of gallbladder carcinoma detected during or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003; 29 (04) 358-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cavallaro A, Piccolo G, Di Vita M. et al. Managing the incidentally detected gallbladder cancer: algorithms and controversies. Int J Surg 2014; 12 (Suppl. 02) S108-S119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Royal College of Pathologists, Histopathology and cytopathology of limited or no clinical value. Available at: Accessed April 18, 2019 https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/6516e9e7-4a23-4839-a8537c40c882a3b9/cbc1d100-3372-482d-a34268bafa829100/G177-BPR-histopathology-and-cytopathology-limited-or-no-clinical-value.pdf
    PubMed
  • 10 van Vliet JL, van Gulik TM, Verbeek PC. Is it necessary to send gallbladder specimens for routine histopathological examination after cholecystectomy? The use of macroscopic examination. Dig Surg 2013; 30 (4-6): 472-475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Emmett CD, Barrett P, Gilliam AD, Mitchell AI. Routine versus selective histological examination after cholecystectomy to exclude incidental gallbladder carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2015; 97 (07) 526-529
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1998. CA Cancer J Clin 1998; 48 (01) 6-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Eslick GD. Epidemiology of gallbladder cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2010; 39 (02) 307-330 , ix
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Randi G, Franceschi S, La Vecchia C. Gallbladder cancer worldwide: geographical distribution and risk factors. Int J Cancer 2006; 118 (07) 1591-1602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wang YC, Wei LJ, Liu JT, Li SX, Wang QS. Comparison of cancer incidence between China and the USA. Cancer Biol Med 2012; 9 (02) 128-132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lohsiriwat V, Vongjirad A, Lohsiriwat D. Value of routine histopathologic examination of three common surgical specimens: appendix, gallbladder, and hemorrhoid. World J Surg 2009; 33 (10) 2189-2193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Crawford JM. The liver and biliary tract. In: Cotran RS, Kumar V, Collins T. eds. Pathological Basis of Disease. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1999: 899
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Rao RV, Kumar A, Sikora SS, Saxena R, Kapoor VK. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: differentiation from associated gall bladder carcinoma. Trop Gastroenterol 2005; 26 (01) 31-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Adson M. Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment of Biliary Tract Disease. New York, NY: Masson; 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Varshney S, Butturini G, Gupta R. Incidental carcinoma of the gallbladder. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002; 28 (01) 4-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lai CH, Lau WY. Gallbladder cancer--a comprehensive review. Surgeon 2008; 6 (02) 101-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 You DD, Lee HG, Paik KY, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW. What is an adequate extent of resection for T1 gallbladder cancers?. Ann Surg 2008; 247 (05) 835-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Clemente G. Unexpected gallbladder cancer: Surgical strategies and prognostic factors. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8 (08) 541-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gagner M, Rossi RL. Radical operations for carcinoma of the gallbladder: present status in North America. World J Surg 1991; 15 (03) 344-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Donohue JH, Nagorney DM, Grant CS, Tsushima K, Ilstrup DM, Adson MA. Carcinoma of the gallbladder. Does radical resection improve outcome?. Arch Surg 1990; 125 (02) 237-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Pearlstone DB, Curley SA, Feig BW. The management of gallbladder cancer: before, during, and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Semin Laparosc Surg 1998; 5 (02) 121-128
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kapoor VK, Pradeep R, Haribhakti SP, Sikora SS, Kaushik SP. Early carcinoma of the gallbladder: an elusive disease. J Surg Oncol 1996; 62 (04) 284-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Roa I, Araya JC, Villaseca M, Roa J, de Aretxabala X, Ibacache G. Gallbladder cancer in a high risk area: morphological features and spread patterns. Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46 (27) 1540-1546
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Shrestha R, Tiwari M, Ranabhat SK, Aryal G, Rauniyar SK, Shrestha HG. Incidental gallbladder carcinoma: value of routine histological examination of cholecystectomy specimens. Nepal Med Coll J 2010; 12 (02) 90-94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar