Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1725933
Open Appendicectomy under Spinal Anesthesia—A Valuable Alternative during COVID-19
Funding None.Abstract
Introduction Concerns relating to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and general anesthesia (GA) prompted our department to consider that open appendicectomy under spinal anesthesia (SA) avoids aerosolization from intubation and laparoscopy. While common in developing nations, it is unusual in the United Kingdom. We present the first United Kingdom case series and discuss its potential role during and after this pandemic.
Methods We prospectively studied patients with appendicitis at a British district general hospital who were unsuitable for conservative management and consequently underwent open appendicectomy under SA. We also reviewed patient satisfaction after 30 days. This ran for 5 weeks from March 25th, 2020 until the surgical department reverted to the laparoscopic appendicectomy as the standard of care. Main outcomes were 30-day complication rates and patient satisfaction.
Results None of the included seven patients were COVID positive. The majority (four-sevenths) had complicated appendicitis. There were no major adverse (Clavien-Dindo grade III to V) postoperative events. Two patients suffered minor postoperative complications. Two experienced intraoperative pain. Mean operative time was 44 minutes. Median length of stay and return to activity was 1 and 14 days, respectively. Although four stated preference in hindsight for GA, the majority (five-sevenths) were satisfied with the operative experience under SA.
Discussion Although contraindications, risk of pain, and specific complications may be limiting, our series demonstrates open appendicectomy under SA to be safe and feasible in the United Kingdom. The technique could be a valuable contingency for COVID-suspected cases and patients with high-risk respiratory disease.
Note
We are appreciative of the expertise of the key surgeons in this case series: Mihai Paduraru, Krystian Pawelec, and George Tenovici.
Publication History
Received: 23 August 2020
Accepted: 12 January 2021
Article published online:
03 June 2021
© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2. Lancet 2020; 396 (10243): 27-38
-
2
Emergency General Surgery—Commissioning Guide—Royal College of Surgeons.
. Accessed April 29, 2020 at: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/library-and-publications/rcs-publications/docs/emergency-general-guide/
-
3 Urgent Intercollegiate General Surgery Guidance on COVID-19 | ACPGBI. Accessed June 22, 2020 at: https://www.acpgbi.org.uk/news/urgent-intercollegiate-general-surgery-guidance-on-covid-19/
- 4 van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH. et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (16) 1564-1567
- 5 Tran K, Cimon K, Severn M, Pessoa-Silva CL, Conly J. Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review. PLoS One 2012; 7 (04) e35797
- 6 Kwak HD, Kim SH, Seo YS, Song KJ. Detecting hepatitis B virus in surgical smoke emitted during laparoscopic surgery. Occup Environ Med 2016; 73 (12) 857-863
- 7 Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R. et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA 2020; 323 (18) 1843-1844
- 8 Coccolini F, Tartaglia D, Puglisi A. et al. SARS-C oV-2 is present in peritoneal fluid in COVID-19 patients. Ann Surg 2020; 272 (03) e240-e242
- 9 Kucirka LM, Lauer SA, Laeyendecker O, Boon D, Lessler J. Variation in false-negative rate of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction-based SARS-CoV-2 tests by time since exposure. Ann Intern Med 2020; 173 (04) 262-267
- 10 Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML. et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (02) 187-196
- 11 Bhangu A. RIFT Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative. Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg 2020; 107 (01) 73-86
- 12 Latif A, Farrukh Bhatti M, Qadir A, Shahwar ZA, Shahzad S. Effectiveness of anaesthesia for appendicectomy: comparison of spinal anaesthesia with other modalities being practiced in Emergency Department of Allama Iqbal Memorial Teaching Hospital. Pak J Med Health Sci 2017; 11 (04) 1402-1403
- 13 Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EAM, Sauerland S. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 11 (11) CD001546
-
14
Anaesthesia UK.
Spinal anaesthesia. Accessed May 30, 2020 at: https://www.frca.co.uk/article.aspx?articleid=100126
- 15 HAREM Steering Group. The HAREM (Had Appendicitis and Resolved/Recurred Emergency Morbidity/Mortality) study. Br J Surg 2020; 107 (08) e257