Subscribe to RSS
Clinical Study on Different Delivery Methods of Twin PregnancyFunding This work was supported by Study on the influence of weight gain during pregnancy on glucose and lipid metabolism and perinatal outcome of twin pregnancy:201914
Objective To investigate the effect of different methods of delivery on the outcome of twin pregnancies.
Methods This is a retrospective cohort review of 627 twin pregnancies with delivery from January 2016 to December 2019. According to the clinical guidelines for cesarean section, the cesarean section and vaginal delivery groups were determined. Finally, the baseline information, delivery method, pregnancy outcome, and maternal and infant complications of the two groups were compared.
Results For different delivery methods, the incidence of preeclampsia was significantly higher in the cesarean section group than in the vaginal delivery group (χ2 = 4.405, p < 0.05). There were 23 fetal growth ratios (FGR) in the cesarean section group, which were significantly higher than the vaginal delivery group (χ2 = 4.740, p < 0.05). However, the incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) in the vaginal delivery group was significantly higher than in the cesarean section group (χ2 = 5.235, p < 0.05). In addition, the volume of postpartum bleeding in the vaginal delivery group was significantly higher than in the cesarean section group (t = 4.723, p < 0.001). The neonatal weights and 5-minute Apgar scores of the vaginal delivery group were lower than the cesarean section group, and the difference was statistically significant. In the vaginal delivery group, 48 and 26 neonates were transferred to the intensive care and neonatal units, respectively, which were significantly higher than in the cesarean section group (χ2 = 5.001, p < 0.05).
Conclusion The major complications of a twin pregnancy are gestational diabetes mellitus and PPROM. Cesarean section can reduce the rate of neonatal asphyxia in twins and improve the pregnancy outcome.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. This study was conducted with approval from the Ethics Committee of Shanxi Wemen and Children Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Ethics board approval number: IRB-KY-2019 = 002
Consent for Publication
Liyan Hu have made substantial contributions to conception and design, Liyan Hu acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data; Liyan Hu have been involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content;Liyan Hu have given final approval of the version to be published.
Availability of Data and Materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article
Received: 29 April 2021
Accepted: 19 July 2021
07 September 2021 (online)
© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
- 1 Leetz I. Twin pregnancy as a high risk pregnancy: new medical statistical data from the German Democratic Republic. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1976; 25: 307-310 DOI: 10.1017/s0001566000014318.
- 2 Feng B, Zhai J, Cai Y. Effect of twin pregnancy chorionic properties on maternal and fetal outcomes. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 57 (03) 351-354 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.03.002.
- 3 Weiner E, Barber E, Feldstein O. et al. Placental Histopathology Differences and Neonatal Outcome in Dichorionic-Diamniotic as Compared to Monochorionic-Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies. Reprod Sci 2018; 25 (07) 1067-1072 DOI: 10.1177/1933719117732163.
- 4 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 144: Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (05) 1118-1132 DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000446856.51061.3e.
- 5 Vayssière C, Benoist G, Blondel B. et al; French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 156 (01) 12-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.045.
- 6 Sun LM, Zhao YY, Duan T. Guidelines for clinical management of twin pregnancy (Part 1)—Monitoring and treatment of twin pregnancy during pregnancy. . [J/CD] Chin J Prenat Diag 2015; 7 (03) 1-8 https://www.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=ZGCQ201503002&dbname=cjfdtotal&dbcode=CJFD&v=MTQ2MDR6aFlVN3pzT1QzaVFyUmN6RnJDVVI3dWZiK1JxRmlEaFZyN01QeXJJZjdHNEg5VE1ySTlGWm9SNkRnOC8=
- 7 Zhu YC, Sun Y, Yang HX. Evidence based medicine evidence for delivery timing and mode of twin pregnancy. Chinese. J Perinat Med 2015; 18 (02) 145-147 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2015.02.015. http://rs.yiigle.com/CN113903201502/65953.htm
- 8 Yamashita A, Ishii K, Taguchi T. et al. Adverse perinatal outcomes related to the delivery mode in women with monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. J Perinat Med 2014; 42 (06) 769-775 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2014-0072.
- 9 Moussa HN, Leon MG, Marti A. et al. Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Preeclampsia Superimposed on Chronic Hypertension with and without Severe Features. Am J Perinatol 2017; 34 (04) 403-408 DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592134.
- 10 Moussa HN, Leon MG, Marti A. et al. Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Preeclampsia Superimposed on Chronic Hypertension with and without Severe Features. Am J Perinatol 2017; 34 (04) 403-408 DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592134.
- 11 Phoa KY, Chedraui P, Pérez-López FR. et al. Perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia and eclampsia in Ecuador. J Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 36 (05) 581-584 DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1107532.