J Wrist Surg 2022; 11(02): 127-133
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735838
Scientific Article

Four-Corner Arthrodesis: Comparative Analysis of Open Technique Versus Percutaneous Technique with Arthroscopic Assistance

1   Department of Hand Surgery, Hospital Mutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile
2   Department of Hand Surgery, Clínica Indisa, Santiago, Chile
3   Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
,
4   Resident of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
,
Nazira Bernal
5   Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Clinica Alemana – Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
,
Miguel Sanhueza
1   Department of Hand Surgery, Hospital Mutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile
6   Department of Hand Surgery, Clínica Santa María, Santiago, Chile
,
Rodrigo Liendo
7   Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, UC-Christus, Santiago, Chile
,
José L. Cifras
1   Department of Hand Surgery, Hospital Mutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile
8   Department of Hand Surgery, Hospital Regional de Talca, Talca, Chile
9   Departamento of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Clínica Dávila, Santiago, Chile
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction Four-corner arthrodesis is a salvage technique for patients with carpal advanced osteoarthritis. Nowadays, percutaneous techniques with arthroscopic assistance have been described, achieving favorable results with minimally invasive techniques advantages over open surgery.

Objective To compare functional and radiological results in patients with SLAC or SNAC wrists operated with open surgical technique versus percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance.

Materials and Methods Retrospective case-control study of clinical records and radiological images of patients with carpal advanced osteoarthritis operated with both surgical techniques. We studied demographic variables, pain with visual analog scale (VAS) score, function in ranges of mobility, time of consolidation, and correction of DISI deformity.

Results A total of 22 male patients with an average age of 32.5 years were studied. Thirteen patients in the case group (percutaneous technique with arthroscopic assistance) and nine patients in the control group (open surgery). Pain score in VAS at discharge was 3 for cases and 5 in controls (p = 0.008), and at 30 days postoperatively, it was 0 and 3 respectively (p = 0.00). The extension and flexion ranges were 52.6°and 38.7° in the cases and 35.7° and 32.4° in the control group (p = 0.119 and 0.0016, respectively). The capitolunate angle was 10°in the controls and 5°in the cases (p = 0.0008). The time of consolidation was 8.8 weeks in cases and 12.5 weeks in controls (p = 0.039).

Conclusions The percutaneous technique with arthroscopic assistance for the 4-courner arthrodesis is a reproducible technique and is effective in achieving consolidation, pain reduction and preservation of wrist motion. In the present study, we demonstrate superiority of this technique over the open surgery.

Level of Evidence This is a Level III, therapeutic study.

Ethical Approval

The authors obtained the ethical approval from their Institution for the study.


The work was carried out with patients treated at the Clinica Davila in Santiago, Chile, and in Hospital Regional de Talca, Talca, Chile.




Publication History

Received: 31 August 2020

Accepted: 02 August 2021

Article published online:
01 October 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Watson HK, Ballet FL. The SLAC wrist: scapholunate advanced collapse pattern of degenerative arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9 (03) 358-365
  • 2 Laulan J, Marteau E, Bacle G. Wrist osteoarthritis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015; 101 (1, Suppl) S1-S9
  • 3 Crema MD, Zentner J, Guermazi A, Jomaah N, Marra MD, Roemer FW. Scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse: MDCT arthrography features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (02) W202-W207
  • 4 Mamede J, Castro Adeodato S, Aquino Leal R. Four-corner arthrodesis. Hand (N Y) 2018; 13 (02) 156-163
  • 5 Weiss KE, Rodner CM. Osteoarthritis of the wrist. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (05) 725-746
  • 6 Ho PC. Arthroscopic partial wrist fusion. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2008; 12 (04) 242-265
  • 7 del Piñal F, Klausmeyer M, Thams C, Moraleda E, Galindo C. Early experience with (dry) arthroscopic 4-corner arthrodesis: from a 4-hour operation to a tourniquet time. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (11) 2389-2399
  • 8 Traverso P, Wong A, Wollstein R, Carlson L, Ashmead D, Watson HK. Ten-year minimum follow-up of 4-corner fusion for SLAC and SNAC Wrist. Hand (N Y) 2017; 12 (06) 568-572
  • 9 Neubrech F, Mühldorfer-Fodor M, Pillukat T, Schoonhoven Jv, Prommersberger KJ. Long-term results after midcarpal arthrodesis. J Wrist Surg 2012; 1 (02) 123-128
  • 10 Berger RA, Bishop AT, Bettinger PC. New dorsal capsulotomy for the surgical exposure of the wrist. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35 (01) 54-59
  • 11 Trail IA, Murali R, Stanley JK. et al. The long-term outcome of four-corner fusion. J Wrist Surg 2015; 4 (02) 128-133
  • 12 Kraisarin J, Dennison DG, Berglund LJ, An KN, Shin AY. Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques used for four-corner arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011; 36 (07) 560-567
  • 13 Erne H, Broer N, Weiss F. et al. Four corner fusion: comparing outcomes of conventional K-wire-, locking plate-, and retrograde headless compression screw fixation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; (e-pub ahead of print) DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.033.
  • 14 Linscheid RL, Dobyns JH, Beabout JW, Bryan RS. Traumatic instability of the wrist. Diagnosis, classification, and pathomechanics. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972; 54 (08) 1612-1632
  • 15 Larsen CF, Mathisen FK, Lindequist S. Measurements of carpiano bone angles on lateral wrist radiographs. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16A: 688-693