Download PDF
neuroreha 2016; 08(02): 76-85
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-105775
Schwerpunkt Assessments
Aus der Praxis
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Testverfahren in der neurologischen Physio- und Ergotherapie

Simone Thomas
1   Private Europäische Medizinische Akademie der Klinik Bavaria in Kreischa GmbH, An der Wolfsschlucht 1–2, 01731 Kreischa
,
Bettina Scheffler
,
Bernhard Elsner
2   SRH Hochschule für Gesundheit Gera gGmbH, Neue Str. 28–30, 07548 Gera, URL: www.srh-gesundheitshochschule.de
,
Jan Mehrholz
1   Private Europäische Medizinische Akademie der Klinik Bavaria in Kreischa GmbH, An der Wolfsschlucht 1–2, 01731 Kreischa
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 June 2016 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Assessments und einfache objektive Tests sind bei der Behandlung von neurologisch erkrankten Patienten nicht mehr wegzudenken. Zum einen bieten sie Aufschluss über den Effekt einer Behandlung, zum anderen sind sie ein wichtiger Motivationsfaktor für den Patienten und wegweisend für die weiterführende Behandlung und Argumentation des Therapeuten. Doch welche Testverfahren erweisen sich im klinischen Alltag als praktikabel?

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Ada L et al. Randomized trial of treadmill walking with body weight support to establish walking in subacute stroke: The MOBILISE trial. Stroke 2010; 41 (6) 1237-1242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ansari NN et al. The Modified Tardieu Scale for the measurement of elbow flexor spasticity in adult patients with hemiplegia. Brain Inj 2008; 22 (13–14) 1007-1012
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Awan R, Smith J, Boon AJ. Measuring shoulder internal rotation range of motion: A comparison of 3 techniques. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83 (9) 1229-1234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Balestreri M et al. Predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale after brain trauma: Change in trend over the past ten years. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75 (1) 161-162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bauder H, Taub E, Miltner W. Behandlung motorischer Störungen nach Schlaganfall: Die Taubsche Bewegungstherapie. In: Taub E, Hrsg. Therapeutische Praxis. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Berg KO et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada 1989; 41: 304-311
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bluvol A, Ford-Gilboe M. Hope, health work and quality of life in families of stroke survivors. J Adv Nurs 2004; 48 (4) 322-332
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bovend Eerdt TJ et al. Evaluation of the Modified Jebsen Test of hand function and the University of Maryland arm questionnaire for stroke. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18 (2) 195-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Carr JH et al. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 1985; 65 (2) 175-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chen H et al. Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23 (5) 435-440
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53 (7) 576-579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Daneski K et al. Reliability and validity of a postal version of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index, modified for use with stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17 (8) 835-839
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 de Winter AF et al. Inter-observer reproducibility of measurements of range of motion in patients with shoulder pain using a digital inclinometer. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004; 5: 18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dorman PJ et al. Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke?. Stroke 1997; 28 (10) 1876-1882
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Duff SV et al. Interrater reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test-Functional Ability Scale: Why it matters. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29 (5) 436-443
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Duncan PW et al. Functional reach: A new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol 1990; 45 (6) M192-197
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Earhart G et al. The 9-hole PEG test of upper extremity function: Average values, test-retest reliability, and factors contributing to performance in people with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther 2011; 35 (4) 157-163
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Engstrand C, Krevers B, Kvist J. Interrater reliability in finger joint goniometer measurement in Dupuytren’s disease. Am J Occup Ther 2012; 66 (1) 98-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 EuroQol-Group. EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16 (3) 199-208
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Fransen M, Edmonds J. Reliability and validity of the EuroQol in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999; 38 (9) 807-813
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gracies JM et al. Reliability of the Tardieu Scale for assessing spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91 (3) 421-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hammer A, Lindmark B. Responsiveness and validity of the Motor Activity Log in patients during the subacute phase after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2010; 32: 1184-1193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hayes K et al. Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion. Aust J Physiother 2001; 47 (4) 289-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Herrero P et al. Reliability of goniometric measurements in children with cerebral palsy: A comparative analysis of universal goniometer and electronic inclinometer. A pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hitzig SL et al. Validation of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index for community-dwelling persons with chronic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93 (1) 108-114
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Holden MK et al. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired: Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984; 64 (1) 35-40
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Janssen MF et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: A multi-country study. Qual Life Res 2012; 22 (7) 1717-1727
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods. Pain 1986; 27 (1) 117-126
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kleyweg RP, van der Meche FG, Schmitz PI. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of muscle strength and functional abilities in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Muscle & Nerve 1991; 14 (11) 1103-1109
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer: A technical report. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012; 7 (3) 306-313
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011; 377 (9778) 1693-1702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lemmens RJ et al. Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: A systematic review. BMC Neurol 2012; 12: 21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Marchetti GF, Whitney SL. Construction and validation of the 4-item dynamic gait index. Phys Ther 2006; 86 (12) 1651-1660
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Marks D. Spastizität messen. Assessment: Tardieu-Skala. physiopraxis 2009; 05: 38-39
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Martin AD et al. Inspiratory muscle strength training improves weaning outcome in failure to wean patients: A randomized trial. Crit Care 2011; 15 (2) R84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Mathiowetz V et al. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1985; 39 (6) 386-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Mathiowetz V et al. Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66 (2) 69-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 May LA, Warren S. Measuring quality of life of persons with spinal cord injury: External and structural validity. Spinal Cord 2002; 40 (7) 341-350
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Mehrholz J et al. The influence of contractures and variation in measurement stretching velocity on the reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with severe brain injury. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19 (1) 63-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Mehrholz J et al. Reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: A comparison study. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19 (7) 751-759
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Mehrholz J et al. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88 (10) 1314-1319
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Mehrholz J. Anhang: Messinstrumente in der neurologischen Rehabilitation. In: Mehrholz J, Hrsg. Neuroreha nach Schlaganfall. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2011: 220-221
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Mehrholz J et al. The General Weakness Syndrome Therapy (GymNAST) study: Protocol for a cohort study on recovery on walking function. BMJ Open 2015; 4 (10) e006168
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Meier Khan C, Oesch P. Validity and responsiveness of the German version of the Motor Activity Log for the assessment of self-perceived arm use in hemiplegia after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 2013; 33: 413-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Miller EL et al. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2010; 41 (10) 2402-2448
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Mutlu A, Livanelioglu A, Gunel MK. Reliability of Ashworth and Modified Ashworth scales in children with spastic cerebral palsy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Nussbaumer S et al. Validity and test-retest reliability of manual goniometers for measuring passive hip range of motion in femoroacetabular impingement patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Oh-Park M et al. Conventional and robust quantitative gait norms in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58 (8) 1512-1518
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Oxford Grice K et al. Adult norms for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 2003; 57 (5) 570-573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Paternostro-Sluga T et al. Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40 (8) 665-671
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Schädler S. Assessment: Dynamic Gait Index. Balance im Gehen beurteilen. Physiotherapie 2006; 10: 40-41
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Schädler S et al. Gleichgewicht beim Gehen: Dynamic Gait Index (DGI). In: Assessments in der Rehabilitation. Huber: Bern; 2012: 313-318
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: Theory and practical applications. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Stark RG et al. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in inflammatory bowel disease in Germany. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010; 16 (1) 42-51
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Tardieu G, Shentoub S, Delarue R. Research on a technique for measurement of spasticity. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1954; 91 (2) 143-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2 (7872) 81-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Tooth LR et al. Reliability of scores between stroke patients and significant others on the Reintegration to Normal Living (RNL) Index. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25 (9) 433-440
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Uswatte G et al. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 2005; 36 (11) 2493-2496
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. Reintegration to normal living as a proxy to quality of life. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40 (6) 491-502
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Wood-Dauphinee SL et al. Assessment of global function: The Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69 (8) 583-590
    Google Scholar