Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(05): 569-574
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742743
Original Article

Use of Rapid Molecular Polymerase Chain Reaction in Early Detection of Bacteremia in Neonates Prior to Blood Culture Positivity: A Pilot Study

Beri Massa-Buck
1   Department of Neonatology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
2   Division of Newborn Services, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Salome Mendoza
3   Department of Pathology, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
,
John Keiser
3   Department of Pathology, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Mohamed A. Mohamed 
4   Department of Neonatology, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations Funding Reagent kits for the FilmArray assay for this study were provided by BioFire Diagnostics (Salt Lake City, UT). No other funding was secured for this study. Role of Funder/Sponsor: BioFire Diagnostics (Salt Lake City, UT) had no role in the design and conduct of the study. BioFire Diagnostics provided reagent kits for this study.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective There has been national strive to decrease the time needed to identify microorganisms in blood culture samples to reduce antibiotic use. This study evaluated rapid molecular polymerase chain reaction (PCR) use in identifying microorganisms in negative culture bottles from neonates with suspected bacterial blood stream infection at 20 to 24 hours of incubation.

Study Design All blood specimens from neonates with suspected blood stream infection were included. Specimens were incubated using a standard blood culturing instrument that would flag positive if bacterial growth was detected. If the specimen was flagged positive at <20 hours, it was tested by PCR and plated for identification as per standard protocol. In our design, if specimen was not flagged at 20 hours of incubation, the bottle was sterilely accessed and a sample was obtained for PCR testing. The bottle would be returned for incubation for 120 hours or until flagged positive.

Results A total of 192 blood specimens were included. Four specimens flagged positive at <20 hours and were all found to be positive by PCR. All other samples did not flag positive by 20 hours of incubation and were tested by PCR between 20 and 24 hours. One sample tested positive via PCR at 21.6 hours then flagged positive on the culturing instrument at 23.5 hours. All other specimens were negative by PCR and remained culture negative at 120 hours. The positive and negative predictive value of PCR verified by blood culture were both equal to 1.0.

Conclusion Using rapid molecular PCR on blood culture specimens at 20 to 24 hours of incubation provides 100% true negative results possibly allowing providers to discontinue antibiotics at 24 hours.

Key Points

  • Antibiotic overuse leads to adverse neonatal outcomes.

  • Molecular PCR may have true negative results.

  • Larger study is needed to discontinue antibiotics earlier.

Keywords

rapid molecular PCR - neonatal bacteremia - neonatal sepsis - pediatric blood culture

Note

Deidentified individual participant data will not be made available.


Authors' Contribution

B.M.-B. conceptualized and designed the study, collected data, performed the initial data analyses, drafted/reviewed, and revised the manuscript. M.A.M. conceptualized and designed the study, performed the initial and final analyses, drafted/reviewed, and revised the manuscript. S.M. coordinated and supervised the technical aspect of the study in the microbiology laboratory, collected data, and critically reviewed and edited the manuscript for intellectual content. J.K. conceptualized and designed the study and critically reviewed and edited the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.




Publication History

Received: 09 September 2021

Accepted: 12 January 2022

Article published online:
11 February 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Camacho-Gonzalez A, Spearman PW, Stoll BJ. Neonatal infectious diseases: evaluation of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Clin North Am 2013; 60 (02) 367-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Puopolo KM, Benitz WE, Zaoutis TE. COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES. Management of neonates born at ≥35 0/7 weeks' gestation with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics 2018; 142 (06) e20182894
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Puopolo KM, Benitz WE, Zaoutis TE. COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES. COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN; COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES. Management of neonates born at ≤34 6/7 weeks' gestation with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics 2018; 142 (06) e20182896
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nizet V, Klein JO. Bacterial sepsis and meningitis. In: Nizet V, Klein JO, Wilson CB. et al., eds. Remington and Klein's Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2016: 217-271
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Brown JVE, Meader N, Wright K, Cleminson J, McGuire W. Assessment of C-reactive protein diagnostic test accuracy for late-onset infection in newborn infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2020; 174 (03) 260-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sharma D, Farahbakhsh N, Shastri S, Sharma P. Biomarkers for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31 (12) 1646-1659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gerdes JS, Polin RA. Sepsis screen in neonates with evaluation of plasma fibronectin. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1987; 6 (05) 443-446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Benitz WE, Han MY, Madan A, Ramachandra P. Serial serum C-reactive protein levels in the diagnosis of neonatal infection. Pediatrics 1998; 102 (04) E41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Escobar GJ, Li DK, Armstrong MA. et al. Neonatal sepsis workups in infants >/=2000 grams at birth: a population-based study. Pediatrics 2000; 106 (2, pt. 1): 256-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mikhael M, Brown LS, Rosenfeld CR. Serial neutrophil values facilitate predicting the absence of neonatal early-onset sepsis. J Pediatr 2014; 164 (03) 522-8.e1 , 3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Murphy K, Weiner J. Use of leukocyte counts in evaluation of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012; 31 (01) 16-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Pourcyrous M, Bada HS, Korones SB, Baselski V, Wong SP. Significance of serial C-reactive protein responses in neonatal infection and other disorders. Pediatrics 1993; 92 (03) 431-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ting JY, Synnes A, Roberts A. et al; Canadian Neonatal Network and Canadian Neonatal Follow-Up Network. Association of antibiotic utilization and neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low gestational age neonates without proven sepsis or necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (10) 972-978
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ting JY, Roberts A, Sherlock R. et al; Canadian Neonatal Network Investigators. Duration of initial empirical antibiotic therapy and outcomes in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2019; 143 (03) e20182286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cotten CM, Taylor S, Stoll B. et al; NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Prolonged duration of initial empirical antibiotic treatment is associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and death for extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (01) 58-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Alexander VN, Northrup V, Bizzarro MJ. Antibiotic exposure in the newborn intensive care unit and the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr 2011; 159 (03) 392-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Alm B, Erdes L, Möllborg P. et al. Neonatal antibiotic treatment is a risk factor for early wheezing. Pediatrics 2008; 121 (04) 697-702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Neal PR, Kleiman MB, Reynolds JK, Allen SD, Lemons JA, Yu PL. Volume of blood submitted for culture from neonates. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 24 (03) 353-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Connell TG, Rele M, Cowley D, Buttery JP, Curtis N. How reliable is a negative blood culture result? Volume of blood submitted for culture in routine practice in a children's hospital. Pediatrics 2007; 119 (05) 891-896
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Harewood FC, Curtis N, Daley AJ, Bryant PA, Gwee A, Connell TG. Adequate or inadequate? The volume of blood submitted for blood culture at a tertiary children's hospital. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2018; 57 (11) 1310-1317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Schelonka RL, Chai MK, Yoder BA, Hensley D, Brockett RM, Ascher DP. Volume of blood required to detect common neonatal pathogens. J Pediatr 1996; 129 (02) 275-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Washington II JA, Ilstrup DM. Blood cultures: issues and controversies. Rev Infect Dis 1986; 8 (05) 792-802
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Deleon C, Shattuck K, Jain SK. Biomarkers of neonatal sepsis. Neoreviews 2015; 16 (05) e297-e308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Liesenfeld O, Lehman L, Hunfeld KP, Kost G. Molecular diagnosis of sepsis: new aspects and recent developments. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) 2014; 4 (01) 1-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chun K, Syndergaard C, Damas C. et al. Sepsis pathogen identification. J Lab Autom 2015; 20 (05) 539-561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ortiz Ibarra J, Trevino Valdez P, Valenzuela Mendez E. et al. Evaluation of the light-cycler septifast test in newborns with suspicion of nosocomial sepsis. Iran J Pediatr 2015; 25 (01) e253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Straub J, Paula H, Mayr M. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the ROCHE Septifast PCR system for the rapid detection of blood pathogens in neonatal sepsis-a prospective clinical trial. PLoS One 2017; 12 (11) e0187688
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Tröger B, Härtel C, Buer J. et al. Clinical relevance of pathogens detected by multiplex PCR in blood of very-low-birth weight infants with suspected sepsis – multicentre study of the German neonatal network. PLoS One 2016; 11 (07) e0159821
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Almuhayawi M, Altun O, Strålin K, Ozenci V. Identification of microorganisms by FilmArray and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry prior to positivity in the blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52 (09) 3230-3236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Cotten CM. Adverse consequences of neonatal antibiotic exposure. Curr Opin Pediatr 2016; 28 (02) 141-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Mukhopadhyay S, Eichenwald EC, Puopolo KM. Neonatal early-onset sepsis evaluations among well-appearing infants: projected impact of changes in CDC GBS guidelines. J Perinatol 2013; 33 (03) 198-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hooven TA, Randis TM, Polin RA. What's the harm? Risks and benefits of evolving rule-out sepsis practices. J Perinatol 2018; 38 (06) 614-622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Mukhopadhyay S, Dukhovny D, Mao W, Eichenwald EC, Puopolo KM. 2010 perinatal GBS prevention guideline and resource utilization. Pediatrics 2014; 133 (02) 196-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Bohanon FJ, Nunez Lopez O, Adhikari D. et al. Race, income and insurance status affect neonatal sepsis mortality and healthcare resource utilization. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2018; 37 (07) e178-e184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Mukhopadhyay S, Lieberman ES, Puopolo KM, Riley LE, Johnson LC. Effect of early-onset sepsis evaluations on in-hospital breastfeeding practices among asymptomatic term neonates. Hosp Pediatr 2015; 5 (04) 203-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Good PI, Hooven TA. Evaluating newborns at risk for early-onset sepsis. Pediatr Clin North Am 2019; 66 (02) 321-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar