Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Zentralbl Chir 2018; 143(02): 155-161
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-124374
Original Article/Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique – A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Steffen Deichmann**
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein – Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Louisa Romina Bolm**
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein – Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Kim Christin Honselmann
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein – Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Ulrich Friedrich Wellner
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein – Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Hryhoriy Lapshyn
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein – Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Tobias Keck****
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein – Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
,
Dirk Bausch****
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein – Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 May 2018 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is a highly challenging procedure. The aim of this study was to analyse post-operative morbidity and mortality as well as long term overall survival in patients undergoing hybrid LPD, as compared to open pancreaticoduodenecomy (OPD) in a single surgeon series.

Methods Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in the period from 2000 to 2015 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. All LPD procedures were performed by one specialised pancreatic surgeon (TK). Patients were matched 1 : 1 for age, sex, BMI, ASA, histological diagnosis, pancreatic texture and portal venous resection (PVR). All LPD procedures were performed as hybrid LPD – combining laparoscopic resection and open reconstruction via mini laparotomy.

Results A total of 549 patients were identified, including 489 patients in the OPD group and 60 patients in the LPD group. 60 patients were identified who underwent LPD between 2010 and 2015 versus 60 OPD patients operated in the same period. Median overall operation time was shorter in the LPD group than with OPD patients (LPD 352 vs. OPD 397 min; p = 0.002). Overall transfusion units were lower in the LPD group (LPD range 0 – 4 vs. OPD range 0 – 11; p = 0.032). Intensive care unit stay (LPD 1 vs. OPD 6 d; p = 0.008) and overall hospital stay (OHS: LPD 14 vs. OPD 18 d; p = 0.012) were shorter in the LPD groups than in the OPD group. As regards postoperative complications, LPD was associated with reduced rates of clinically relevant grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (LPD 15 vs. OPD 36%; p = 0.036) and grade B/C delayed gastric emptying (LPD 8 vs. OPD 20%; p = 0.049). A total of 56 patients were diagnosed with malignant disease. The number of harvested lymph nodes and R0-resection rates were equal for LPD and OPD patients. LPD patients showed a trend to improved median overall survival (LPD mean 56 months vs. OPD mean 48 months; p = 0.056).

Conclusion Hybrid LPD is a safe procedure associated with a reduction in clinically relevant postoperative complications and allows faster recovery. Long term oncological outcome of hybrid LPD for malignant disease is equal to that with the standard open approach.

* S. Deichmann und L. Bolm trugen zu gleichen Teilen zu dieser Arbeit bei und teilen die Erstautorenschaft.


** T. Keck und D. Bausch trugen zu gleichen Teilen zu dieser Arbeit bei und teilen die Seniorautorenschaft.