Synlett
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1763623
synpacts

Retrosynthetic Simplicity

Mark D. Levin
This manuscript highlights work, published elsewhere, that was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM142768).


Abstract

Retrosynthetic simplicity is introduced as a metric by which methods can be evaluated. An argument in favor of reactions which are retrosynthetically simple is put forward, and recent examples in the context of skeletal editing from my own laboratory as well as contributions from others are analyzed critically through this lens.

1 Introduction

2 Example 1: Quinoline to Quinazoline (One Product, Two Starting Materials)

3 Example 2: Benzene to Pyridine (Two Products, One Starting ­Material)

4 Caveats, Counterarguments, and Conclusions



Publication History

Received: 08 October 2023

Accepted after revision: 06 November 2023

Article published online:
09 November 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Chan HF, Önder AS, Schweitzer S, Torgler B. Econ. Lett 2023 231. 111270.
  • 2 Branch TA, Côté IM, David SR, Drew JA, LaRue M, Márquez MC, Parsons EC. M, Rabaiotti D, Shiffman D, Steen DA, Wild AL. bioRXiv 2023 DOI: preprint; DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.17.558161
  • 3 Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Chem. Rev. 1995 95. 2457.
  • 4 Evans DA, Golob AM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975 97. 4765.
  • 5 Ghosez L. Isr. J. Chem 2018 58. 127.
  • 6 Brown DG, Boström J. J. Med. Chem. 2016 59. 4443.
  • 7 Roughley SD, Jordan AM. J. Med. Chem. 2011 54. 3451.
  • 8 Wang Y, Haight I, Gupta R, Vasudevan A. J. Med. Chem. 2021 64. 17115.
  • 9 Bertz SH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982 104. 5801.
  • 10 Whitesides GM, Ismagilov RF. Science 1999 284. 89.
  • 11 Fuchs PL. Tetrahedron 2001 57. 6855.
  • 12 Woo S, Shenvi RA. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021 54. 1157.
  • 13 Jurczyk J, Woo J, Kim SF, Dherange BD, Sarpong R, Levin MD. Nat. Synth. 2022 1. 352.
  • 14 Boger DL. J. Org. Chem. 2017 82. 11961.
  • 15 Kennedy SH, Dherange BD, Berger KJ, Levin MD. Nature 2021 593. 223.
  • 16 Wilson RM, Danishefsky SJ. J. Org. Chem 2006 71. 8329.
  • 17 Szpilman AM, Carreira EM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010 49. 9592.
  • 18 Fan Z, Chen X, Tanaka K, Park HS, Lam NY. S, Wong JJ, Houk KN, Yu J.-Q. Nature 2022 610. 87.
  • 19 Woo J, Stein C, Christian AH, Levin MD. Nature 2023 623. 77 .
  • 20 Woo J, Christian AH, Burgess SA, Yuan J, Mansoor UF, Levin MD. Science 2022 376. 527.
  • 21 Reisenbauer JC, Green O, Franchino A, Finkelstein P, Morandi B. Science 2022 377. 1104.
  • 22 Pearson TJ, Shimazumi R, Driscoll JL, Dherange BD, Park D.-I, Levin MD. Science 2023 381. 1474.
  • 23 Patel SC, Burns NZ. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2022 144. 17797.
  • 24 Corey EJ, Cheng X.-M. The Logic of Chemical Synthesis. Hoboken Wiley. 1995
  • 25 Mikulak-Klucznik B, Gołębiowska P, Bayly AA, Popik O, Klucznik T, Szymkuć S, Gajewska EP, Dittwald P, Staszewska-Krajewska O, Beker W, Badowski T, Scheidt KA, Molga K, Mlynarski J, Mrksich M, Grzybowski BA. Nature 2020 588. 83.
  • 26 Lin Y, Zhang R, Wang D, Cernak T. Science 2023 379. 453 .
  • 27 Beker W, Roszak R, Wołos A, Angello NH, Rathore V, Burke MD, Grzybowski BA. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2022 144. 4819.
  • 28 Trost BM. Science 1983 219. 245.
  • 29 Trost B. Science 1991 254. 1471.
  • 30 Gaich T, Baran PS. J. Org. Chem 2010 75. 4657.
  • 31 Kolb HC, Finn MG, Sharpless KB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2001 40. 2004.
  • 32 von Goethe JW. Goethe’s Opinions on the World, Mankind, Literature, Science, and Art. London J. W. Parker and Son. 1853 .