Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(12): 1728-1735
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1780523
Original Article

Variability in Practice and Implementation of Oxygen Target Saturation Policies in United States' Neonatal Intensive Care Units

Pratik Parikh
1   Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Christus Children Hospital, San Antonio, Texas
,
Robert D. White
2   Regional Newborn Program, Beacon Children's Hospital, South Bend, Indiana
,
Veeral N. Tolia
3   Pediatrix Center for Research, Education, Quality and Safety, Sunrise, Florida
4   Department of Pediatrics, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Brent Reyburn
5   Department of Pediatrics, Baptist Children’s Hospital at North Central, San Antonio, Texas
,
Charleta Guillory
6   Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Neonatal-Perinatal Public Health Program, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Kaashif A. Ahmad
3   Pediatrix Center for Research, Education, Quality and Safety, Sunrise, Florida
7   Department of Neonatology, The Woman's Hospital of Texas, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to describe target oxygen saturation (SpO2) ranges used for premature infants in United States' neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to describe if these target SpO2 ranges have changed in recent years.

Study Design A 29-question survey focused on target SpO2 practices and policies was distributed via the NICU medical directors listservs for the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine and Pediatrix Medical Group between August and October of 2021. Results were collected via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap).

Results We received responses representing 170 unique, levels 2, 3, and 4 NICUs from 36 states. Most NICUs (130, 78%) have recently changed their SpO2 targets in response to target SpO2 clinical trials. Over time, the most commonly reported target SpO2 range has shifted from 88–92% to 90–95. Of NICUs that changed limits, the most common lower SpO2 limits increased from 88 to 90% and the upper SpO2 limits changed from 92 to 95%. The interquartile range for lower SpO2 limit shifted from 85–88% to 88–90% and the IQR for upper SpO2 limit decreased from 92–95 to 94–95%. Most NICUs had designated conditions that would allow for deviations from standard target SpO2 ranges. These most commonly include pulmonary hypertension (152, 95%), severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (81, 51%), and retinopathy of prematurity (51, 32%).

Conclusion Oxygen saturation limits have changed over time with an overall increase in targeted SpO2. However, there remains considerable interunit variation in SpO2 policies. There is a need to achieve consensus to optimize clinical outcomes.

Key Points

  • What are the SpO2 ranges in United States' NICUs?

  • There is a shift in SpO2 ranges for preterm infants in NICUs across United States.

  • Variability still persists in SpO2 ranges for preterm infants in United States' NICUs.

Keywords

oxygen saturation - oxygen target saturation ranges - alarm limits - retinopathy of prematurity

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Methodist Healthcare Institutional Review Board (San Antonio, TX).


Availability of Data and Material

The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to concern of identifying NICUs who responded in the survey but are available from the corresponding author (P.P.).


Authors' Contributions

P.P. was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, investigation data curation, formal analysis, resources, writing initial manuscript and editing manuscript. K.A.A. was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, investigation, supervision, formal analysis, reviewing and editing the manuscript. V.N.T., R.D.W., and C.G. were responsible for conceptualization, supervision, reviewing and editing the manuscript. B.R. was responsible for conceptualization and reviewing and editing the manuscript.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 18 October 2023

Accepted: 23 January 2024

Article published online:
19 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Silverman WA. A cautionary tale about supplemental oxygen: the albatross of neonatal medicine. Pediatrics 2004; 113 (02) 394-396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Higgins RD. Oxygen saturation and retinopathy of prematurity. Clin Perinatol 2019; 46 (03) 593-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Tarnow-Mordi W, Stenson B, Kirby A. et al; BOOST-II Australia and United Kingdom Collaborative Groups. Outcomes of two trials of oxygen-saturation targets in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (08) 749-760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Stenson BJ, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Darlow BA. et al; BOOST II United Kingdom Collaborative Group, BOOST II Australia Collaborative Group, BOOST II New Zealand Collaborative Group. Oxygen saturation and outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (22) 2094-2104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Carlo WA, Finer NN, Walsh MC. et al; SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Target ranges of oxygen saturation in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (21) 1959-1969
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Vaucher YE, Peralta-Carcelen M, Finer NN. et al; SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in the early CPAP and pulse oximetry trial. N Engl J Med 2012; 367 (26) 2495-2504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Askie LM, Darlow BA, Finer N. et al; Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis (NeOProM) Collaboration. Association between oxygen saturation targeting and death or disability in extremely preterm infants in the Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis collaboration. JAMA 2018; 319 (21) 2190-2201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cummings JJ, Polin RA. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Oxygen targeting in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2016; 138 (02) e20161576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G. et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2016 Update. Neonatology 2017; 111 (02) 107-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Huizing MJ, Villamor-Martínez E, Vento M, Villamor E. Pulse oximeter saturation target limits for preterm infants: a survey among European neonatal intensive care units. Eur J Pediatr 2017; 176 (01) 51-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Darlow BA, Vento M, Beltempo M. et al; on behalf of the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes (iNeo) of Neonates. Variations in Oxygen Saturation Targeting, and Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening and Treatment Criteria in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: An International Survey. Neonatology 2018; 114 (04) 323-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sutton R, Raptaki M, Wilby E, Mahaveer A. G125(P) Oxygen saturation target monitoring in preterm babies: a survey of level 3 units in United Kingdom. Arch Dis Child 2014; 99 (Suppl. 01) A53-A53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Polin RA, Bateman D. Oxygen-saturation targets in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (22) 2141-2142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G. et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2019 Update. Neonatology 2019; 115 (04) 432-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sola A, Golombek SG, Montes Bueno MT. et al. Safe oxygen saturation targeting and monitoring in preterm infants: can we avoid hypoxia and hyperoxia?. Acta Paediatr 2014; 103 (10) 1009-1018
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Manley BJ, Kuschel CA, Elder JE, Doyle LW, Davis PG. Higher rates of retinopathy of prematurity after increasing oxygen saturation targets for very preterm infants: experience in a single center. J Pediatr 2016; 168: 242-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Schmidt B, Kirpalani H. Safe and sound oxygen therapy for extremely preterm infants: a literature review. Pediatr Med 2022; 5: 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Manja V, Lakshminrusimha S, Cook DJ. Oxygen saturation target range for extremely preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2015; 169 (04) 332-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hagadorn JI, Furey AM, Nghiem TH. et al; AVIOx Study Group. Achieved versus intended pulse oximeter saturation in infants born less than 28 weeks' gestation: the AVIOx study. Pediatrics 2006; 118 (04) 1574-1582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 The STOP-ROP Multicenter Study Group. Supplemental Therapeutic Oxygen for Prethreshold Retinopathy Of Prematurity (STOP-ROP), a randomized, controlled trial. I: primary outcomes. Pediatrics 2000; 105 (02) 295-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Colaizy TT, Longmuir S, Gertsch K, Abràmoff MD, Klein JM. Use of a supplemental oxygen protocol to suppress progression of retinopathy of prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58 (02) 887-891
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar