Download PDF
Endoskopie heute 2004; 17(3): 149-153
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-820404
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Medikation und Überwachung bei endoskopischen Eingriffen - für wen, wann und wie?

Premedication and Monitoring During Endoscopic Procedures - for whom, when and howA. Riphaus1 , T. Wehrmann1
  • 1Medizinische Klinik I (Gastroenterologie & Interventionelle Endoskopie), Klinikum Hannover-Siloah, Hannover
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 November 2004 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Endoskopische Untersuchungen erfordern häufig eine adäquate Sedierung des Patienten insbesondere bei therapeutischen Interventionen. Hierbei bieten neuere kurzwirksame Medikamente den Vorteil einer guten Steuerbarkeit der gewünschten Sedierungstiefe, die abhängig von der Art und dem Umfang der Untersuchung ist. Ein entsprechendes Patientenmonitoring ist hierbei obligat. Neue Monitoring- und patientengesteuerte Applikationsverfahren, sowie die Möglichkeit der Sedierung durch nicht ärztliches Assistenzpersonal eröffnen hier neue Perspektiven zur Minimierung von Komplikationen und der Vereinfachung der Sedierung, möglichst auch für den ambulanten Bereich.

Abstract

Endoscopic procedures frequently require an appropriate sedation of the patient, especially during therapeutic interventions. New short acting medications offer the advantage of a good control concerning the depth of sedation, which depends on the mode and complexity of the investigation. An appropriate monitoring of the patient is therefore mandatory. New monitoring- and patient-controlled application procedures and the possibility of nurse-administered sedation offer new options to minimize complications and to simplify the application, especially for the outpatient setting.

Schlüsselwörter

Indikation - Sedierungsform - Monitoring - Nachbeobachtung

Key words

Indication - monitoring - medication - follow up

Literatur

  • 1 Daneshmend T K, Bell G D, Logan F R. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: result of a nationwide survey.  Gut. 1991;  32 12-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Keefe E B, O'Connor K W. 1989 ASGE survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 S13-S18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Froehlich F, Gonvers J J, Fried M. Conscious sedation, clinically relevant complications and monitoring of endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland.  Endoscopy. 1994;  26 231-234
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Rex D K, Imperiale T F, Portish V. Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 554-559
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Heuss L T. Persönliche Mitteilung 2004. 
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Quine M A, Bell G D, McCloy R F. et al . Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England; Safety, staffing, and sedation methods.  Gut. 1995;  36 462-467
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sauerbruch T, Scheurlen Ch. Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselerkrankungen für die Durchführung endoskopischer Untersuchungen. Demeter, Stuttgart 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 8 American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . Guiedelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopes.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 317-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists . Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists.  Anesthesiology.. 2002;  96 4-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 [American Society of Anaesthesiologists] . Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anaesthesiologists: a report by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anaesthesiologists.  Anaesthesiology. 1996;  84 459-471
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lazzaroni M, Porro G B. Preparation, premedication and surveillance in gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1994;  26 3-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Jurrell K R, O'Connor K W, Slack J. et al . Effect of supplementel oxygen on cardiopulmonary changes during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 665-670
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Vargo J J, Zuccaro G, Dumot J AA, Conwell D L, Morrow J B, Shay S S. Automated graphic assessment of respiratory activity is superior to pulse oximetry and visual assessment for the detection of early respiratory depression during therapeutic upper endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 826-831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wehrmann T, Grotkamp J, Stergiou N, Riphaus A, Lembcke B, Schultz A. Electroencephalogram monitoring facilitates sedation with propofol for routine ERCP: a randomized, controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 817-824
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Van Houten J S, Crane S A, Janardan S K, Wells K. A randomized, prospective, double-blind comparison of midazolam (Versed) and emulsified diazepam (Dizac) for opioid-based, conscious sedation in endoscopic procedures.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;  93 170-174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Macken E, Gevers A M, Hendrickx A, Rutgeerts P. Midazolam versus diazepam in lipid emulsion as conscious sedation for colonoscopy with or without reversal of sedation with flumazenil.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 57-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Zakko S F, Seifert H A, Gross J B. A comparison of midazolam and diazepam for conscious sedation during colonoscopy in a prospective double-blind study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 684-689
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kostash M A, Johnston R, Bailey R J, Konopad E M, Guthriern L P. Sedation for colonoscopy: a double-blind comparison of diazepam/meperidine, midazolam/fentanyl and propofol/fentanyl combinations.  Can J Gastroenterol. 1994;  8 27-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Diab F H, King P D, Barthel J S, Marshall J B. Efficacy and safety of combined meperidine and midazolam for EGD sedation compared with midazolam alone.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 1120-1125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Schwertner C, Mayr M, Leistert H, Longdong W. Risks, but no benefits, of a midazolam-fentanyl combination as a premedication of ERCP [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 1996;  110 A 38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Froehlich F, Thorens J, Schwizer W. et al . Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Laluna L, Allen M L, Dimarino A J. The comparison of midazolam and topical lidocaine spray versus the combination of midazolam, meperidine, and topical lidocaine spray to sedate patients for upper endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 289-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fisher N C, Bailey S, Gibson J A. A prospective, randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 21-24
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Eckardt V S, Kanzler G, Schmitt T. et al . Complikations and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 560-565
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rex D K, Imperiale T F, Portish V. Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 554-559
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ristikankare M, Hartikainen J, Heikkinen M. Is routinely given conscious sedation of benefit during colonoscopy?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 566-572
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bonta P I, Kok M F, Bergman J J. et al . Conscious sedation for EUS of the esophagus and stomach: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing midazolam with placebo.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 842-847
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Raymondos K, Panning B, Bachem I. Evaluation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under conscious sedation and general anesthesia.  Endoscopy.. 2002;  34 721-726
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Heisenbach T. How safe is premedication in ambulatory endoscopy in Germany? A prospective study in gastroenterology specialty practices.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2000;  125 1288-1289
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Terruzzi V, Meucci G, Radaelli F, Terreni N, Minoli G. Routine versus “on demand” sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 169-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Patterson K W, Casey P B, Murray J P, O'Boyle C A, Cunningham A J. Propofol sedation for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison with midazolam.  Br J Anaesth. 1991;  67 108-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Carlsson U, Grattidge P. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol and midazolam.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 240-243
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wehrmann T, Kokabpick S, Lembcke B, Caspary W F, Seifert H. Efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol sedation during routine ERCP: a prospective, controlled study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 677-683
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Jung M, Hofmann C, Kiesslich R, Brackertz A. Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative to midazolam.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 233-238
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Vargo J J, Zuccaro G, Dumot J A. Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial.  Gastroenterology. 2002;  123 8-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T. Sedierung mittels Propofol vs. Midazolam/Pethidin bei der ERCP von älteren Hochrisikopatienten.  Endoskopie heute. 2004;  17 69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Reimann F M, Samson U, Derad I, Fuchs M, Schiefer B, Stange E F. Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopies.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 239-244
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Seifert H, Schmitt T H, Gultekin T, Caspary W F, Wehrmann T. Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;  14 1207-1214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Sipe B W, Rex D K, Latinovich D. Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists.  Gastrointest Endosc.. 2002;  55 815-825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Heuss L T, Schnieper P, Drewe J, Pflimlin E, Beglinger C. Risk stratification and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: a prospective observational study of more than 2 000 cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 664-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kulling D, Fantin A C, Biro P, Bauerfeind P, Fried M. Safer colonoscopy with patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with propofol and alfentanil.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Ng J M, Kong C F, Nyam D. Patient-controlled sedation with propofol for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 8-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Prof. Dr. T. Wehrmann

Medizinische Klinik I · Klinikum Hannover-Siloah

Roesebeckstr. 15

30449 Hannover

Phone: 05 11-9 27-22 31

Fax: 05 11-9 26-26 69

Email: twehrmann@hotmail.com

      >