Download PDF
Endoscopy 2007; 39(6): 556-565
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966534
Review

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Ethical issues in endoscopy: patient satisfaction, safety in elderly patients, palliation, and relations with industry

Second European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Kos, Greece, July 2006S.  D.  Ladas1 , B.  Novis1 , K.  Triantafyllou1 , R.  Schoefl1 , T.  Rokkas1 , C.  Stanciu1 , P.  Isaacs1 , S.  N.  Willich1 , O.  Ronn1 , H.  Dremel1 , G.  Livadas1 , B.  J.  Egan1 , S.  Boyacioglu1 , A.  Selimovic1 , R.  Pulanic1 , J.  A.  Karagiannis1 , J.  P.   Van Vooren1 , E.  Kouroumalis1 , C.  O’Morain1 , A.  Nowak1 , J.  Deviere1 , P.  Malfertheiner1 , A.  Axon1
  • 1European Society of Gastroenterology, Munich, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 22 March 2007

accepted after revision 19 April 2007

Publication Date:
06 June 2007 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Introduction

The explosive development of gastroenterology and gastrointestinal endoscopy over the past few years, with clinical trials of powerful new drugs and top-quality endoscopes and accessories, has led to a huge increase in the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of modern gastroenterology. At the same time the percentage of elderly people in Europe has increased, patients attending gastrointestinal endoscopy units are expecting to undergo painless endoscopy procedures, and palliative endoscopic therapy is increasingly being used for patients with lethal gastrointestinal diseases. This new environment presents a number of ethical issues and necessitates an updated consensus applicable in the clinical practice of gastroenterology.

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the Organisation Mondiale d’Endoscopie Digestive (OMED), in collaboration with the United European Gastroenterology Federation (UEGF), organized the Second European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy on the island of Kos, Greece, in July 2006. Twenty-three expert gastroenterologists, surgeons, and scientists from the biomedical industry participated in four workshops, aiming to formulate a consensus statement after presentation of the topics, discussion, and voting in a plenary session. We are happy to present these consensus reports here in Endoscopy and hope that they will help our colleagues in their clinical practice.

References

  • 1 Maciejewski M, Kawiecki J, Rockwood T. Satisfaction in understanding health care outcomes research. Gaithersburg, Maryland; Aspen Publishers Inc 1997: 67-89
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Yacavone R F, Locke G R, Gostout C J. et al . Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 703-710
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Drossman D D, Brandt L J, Sears C. et al . A preliminary study of patients’ concerns related to GI endoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 287-291
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Stanciu C, Novis B, Ladas S. et al . Recommendations of the ESGE workshop on informed consent for digestive endoscopy. First European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Kos, Greece, June 2003.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 772-774
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Yagi J, Adachi B, Arima N. et al . A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1226-1231
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Abrahams N S, Wieczorek P, Huang J. et al . Assessing clinical generability in sedation studies of upper GI endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 28-33
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Ladas S D, Aabakken L, Rey J F. et al . Use of sedation for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy survey of national endoscopy society members.  Digestion. 2006;  74 69-77
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Ladas S D. Factors predicting the possibility of conducting colonoscopy without sedation.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 688-692
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Hull T, Church J M. Colonoscopy: how difficult, how painful?.  Surg Endosc. 1994;  7 784-787
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Davies A R, Ware J E. GHAA’s consumer satisfaction survey and users manual. 2nd edn. Washington DC; Group Health Association of America 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 11 White B. Measuring patient satisfaction: how to do it and why to bother.  Fam Pract Manag. 1999;  6 40-44
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Gavin K T, Turner M J. Methods of surveying patient’s satisfaction.  BMJ. 1997;  314 227
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Cohen G, Forbes J, Garraway M. Can different patient satisfaction survey methods yield consistent results? Comparison of three surveys.  BMJ. 1996;  313 841-844
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Guralnik J M, Ferrucci L. Demography and epidemiology. In: Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Halter JB et al, (eds). Principles of geriatric medicine and gerontology. 5th edn. New York; McGraw-Hill 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Hall K E, Proctor D D, Fisher L. et al . American Gastroenterological Association Future Trends Committee Report: Effects of aging of the population on gastroenterology practice, education and research.  Gastroenterology. 2005;  129 1305-1338
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Bell G D. Premedication, preparation and surveillance.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 2-12
    Google Scholar
  • 17 ASGE . ASGE guideline: modification in endoscopic practice for the elderly.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  63 566-568
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Papadopoulos A A, Kateri M, Triantafyllou K. et al . Hospitalisation rates for cholelithiasis and acute cholecystitis doubled for the aged in Greece over the past 30 years.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;  41 1330-1335
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Ladas S D. Informed consent: still far from ideal.  Digestion. 2006;  73 187-188
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Corfield L, Granne I. Treating non-competent patients.  BMJ. 2005;  339 1353-1354
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Muravchick S. Anesthesia for the geriatric patient. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, (eds). Clinical Anesthesia. 4th edn. Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2001: 1205-1216
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Triantafyllou K, Stanciu C, Kruse A. et al . Informed consent for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a 2002 ESGE survey.  Dig Dis. 2002;  20 280-283
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Abraham N S, Fallone C A, Mayrand S. et al . Sedation versus no sedation in the performance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a Canadian randomized controlled cost-outcome study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 1692-1699
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M. et al . Sedation-free colonoscopy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 855-859
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Lord D A, Bell G D, Gray A. et al .Sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures in the elderly: getting safer but still not nearly safe enough. UK guideline. Available from: URL: http://www.bsg.org.uk/pdf_word_docs/sedation_elderly.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Waring J P, Baron T H, Hirota W K. et al . Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 317-322
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Leslie K, Stonell C A. Anaesthesia and sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2005;  18 431-436
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Axon A T, Beilenhoff U, James T. et al . Legal and ethical considerations: group 4 report. ESGE/UEGF colorectal cancer - public awareness campaign. The public/professional interface workshop, Oslo, Norway, June 20-22, 2003.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 362-365
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Garside R, Pitt M, Somerville M. et al . Surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.  Health Technol Assess. 2006;  10 1-158
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Walter L C, Corinsky K E. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making.  JAMA. 2001;  285 2750-2756
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Lin O S, Kozarek R A, Schembre D B. et al . Screening colonoscopy in very elderly patients: prevalence of neoplasia and estimated impact on life expectancy.  JAMA. 2006;  295 2411-2412
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Rich J S, Black W C. When should we stop screening?.  Eff Clin Pract. 2000;  3 78-84
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Ko C W, Sonnenberg A. Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients.  Gastroenterology. 2005;  129 1163-1170
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Kojima M. Risks of general anaesthesia in the elderly.  Act Anesth Scand. 2006;  50 9-25
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Kalisvaart K J, Vreeswijk R, de Jonghe J F. et al . Risk factors and prediction of postoperative delirium in elderly hip-surgery patients.  J Am Ger Soc. 2006;  54 817-822
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Pessaux P, Tuech J J, Derouet N. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: a prospective study.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 1067-1069
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Fondras J C. Soins palliatifs et soins de support en oncologie: définitions, présupposés et enjeux.  Médecine Palliative. 2003;  2 159-167
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Andersen J R, Sorensen S M, Kruse A. et al . Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprostheses versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice.  Gut. 1989;  30 1132-1135
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Speer A G, Cotton P B, Russel R C. et al . Randomised trial of endoscopic versus percutaneous stent insertion in malignant obstructive jaundice.  Lancet. 1987;  2 57-62
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Davids P H, Groen A K, Rauws E A. et al . Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction.  Lancet. 1992;  340 1488-1492
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Maetani I, Tada T, Ukita T. et al . Comparison of duodenal stent placement with surgical gastrojejunostomy for palliation in patients with duodenal obstructions caused by pancreatobiliary malignancies.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 73-78
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Dumonceau J M, Devière J. Self-expandable metal stents.  Baillières Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 1999;  13 109-130
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Enns R. Palliation in gastroduodenal obstruction [editorial].  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 743-745
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Willard C, Luker K. Supportive care in the cancer setting: rhetoric or reality?.  Palliat Med. 2005;  19 328-333
    Google Scholar
  • 45 World Medical Association .Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000.  Available from: URL: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Bekelman J E, Li Y, Gross C P. et al . Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.  JAMA. 2003;  289 454-465
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Gross C P, Gupta A R, Krumholz H M. Disclosure of financial competing interests in randomised controlled trials: cross-sectional review.  BMJ. 2003;  326 526-527
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Lexchin J, Bero L A, Djulbegovic B. et al . Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.  BMJ. 2003;  326 1167-1170
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Ridker P M, Torres J. Reported outcomes in major cardiovascular clinical trials funded by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations: 2000 - 2005.  JAMA. 2006;  295 2270-2274
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Kaptchuk T J. The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: gold standard or golden calf?.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;  54 541-549
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Rothman K J, Michels K B. The continuing unethical use of placebo controls.  N Engl J Med. 1994;  331 394-398
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Malfertheiner P, Lind T, Willich S. et al . Prognostic influence of Barrett’s oesophagus and Helicobacter pylori infection on healing of erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and symptom resolution in non-erosive GORD: report from the ProGORD study.  Gut. 2005;  54 746-751
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Bickerstaffe R, Brock P, Husson J-M. et al . Ethics and pharmaceutical medicine: the full report of the Ethical Issues Committee of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the UK.  Int J Clin Pract. 2006;  60 242-252
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Mackie J E, Taylor A D, Finegold D L. et al . Lessons on ethical decision making from the bioscience industry.  PLoS Med. 2006;  3 e129
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Novas C. What is the bioscience industry doing to address the ethical issues it faces?.  PLoS Med. 2006;  3 e142
    Google Scholar

S. D. Ladas, MD

Hepato-Gastroenterology Unit

”Attikon” University General Hospital

Medical School, Athens University

1 Rimini Street

124 62 Haidari

Greece

Fax: +30-210-5326422

Email: sdladas@hol.gr

      >