Evidenzbasierte Medizin: Was ist ihre Bedeutung in der aktuellen kieferorthopädischen Praxis

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag hat zum Ziel, das Konzept der evidenzbasierten Medizin für die Kieferorthopädie vorzustellen. Dazu werden Geschichte und Philosophie der evidenzbasierten Medizin ebenso diskutiert, wie ihre Implementierung in die tägliche kieferorthopädische Praxis. Der Einfluss der evidenzbasierten Medizin wird dann am Beispiel der Frühbehandlung von Dysgnathien der Klassen III und II, der kieferorthopädischen Bewegung von Zähnen und der skelettalen Verankerung demonstriert. Damit eröffnet sich eine moderne Perspektive auf die bewährtesten Behandlungsverfahren in diesen klinischen Bereichen.

Abstract

This article will introduce the concept of evidence based medicine in contemporary orthodontics. The history and philosophy of evidence based medicine will be discussed and its implementation during day-to-day orthodontic practice. The influence of evidence based medicine will then be expanded in relation to the early treatment of class III and class II malocclusion, orthodontic tooth movement and skeletal anchorage to provide a modern perspective on the most robust treatment approaches associated with these clinical domains.

Schlüsselwörter

Evidenzbasierte Medizin - Frühbehandlung von Klasse-II-/Klasse-III-Dysgnathien - kieferorthopädische Zahnbewegung - skelettale Verankerung

Key words

Evidence-based medicine - early treatment of Class II/Class III malocclusion - orthodontic tooth movement - skeletal anchorage

• Literatur

• 1 Turpin DL. Evidence-based orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 591
• 2 Turpin DL. Defining the future of orthodontic research. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 487-488
• 3 Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services. Nuffield Trust; London: 1972
• 4 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA. et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996; 312: 71-72
• 5 Konstantonis D, Vasileiou D, Papageorgiou SN. et al. Soft tissue changes following extraction vs. nonextraction orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Sci 2018; 126: 167-179
• 6 Mulimani PS. Evidence-based practice and the evidence based pyramid: a 21st century orthodontic odyssey. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 152: 1-8
• 7 O'Brien K, Sandler J. In the land of no evidence, is the salesman king?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 247-249
• 8 Proffit WR. Evidence and clinical decisions: asking the right questions to obtain clinically useful answers. Semin Orthod 2013; 19: 130-136
• 9 Mandall N, DiBiase A, Littlewood S. et al. Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 15-month follow-up. J Orthod 2010; 37: 149-161
• 10 Mandall N, Cousley R, DiBiase A. et al. Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-year follow-up. J Orthod 2012; 39: 176-185
• 11 Mandall N, Cousley R, DiBiase A. et al. Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial. 6 year follow-up. J Orthod 2016; 43: 164-175
• 12 Tulloch JF, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 657-667
• 13 King GJ, McCorray SP, Wheeler TT. et al. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1- phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 489-496
• 14 O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F. et al. Early treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion with the twin block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 573-579
• 15 Batista KB, Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE. et al. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 3: CD003452
• 16 Seehra J, Fleming PS, Newton T. et al. Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion, self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life. J Orthod 2011; 38: 247-256
• 17 Kallunki J, Sollenius O, Paulsson L. et al. Oral health-related quality of life among children with excessive overjet or unilateral posterior crossbite with functional shift compared to children with no or mild orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod 2019; 41: 111-116
• 18 Scott P, Sherriff M, DiBiase AT. et al. Perception of discomfort during initial orthodontic tooth alignment using a self-ligating or conventional bracket system: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 227-232
• 19 Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M. et al. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134 470 e1-e8
• 20 Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Lee RT. Randomized clinical trial of orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 738-742
• 21 DiBiase AT, Nasr IH, Scott P. et al. Duration of treatment and occlusal outcome using Damon 3 self-ligated and conventional orthodontic bracket systems in extraction patient: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: e111-e116
• 22 Papageorgiou SN, Konstantinidis I, Papadopoulos K. et al. Clinical effects of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orth 2014; 36: 350-363
• 23 Woodhouse NR, DiBiase AT, Papageorgiou SN. et al. Supplemental vibrational force does not reduce pain experience during initial alignment with fixed orthodontic appliances: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 17224
• 24 DiBiase AT, Woodhouse NR, Papageorgiou SN. et al. Effects of supplemental vibrational force on space closure, treatment duration, and occlusal outcome: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 153: 469-480
• 25 Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP, Papadopoulos MA. Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142: 577-595
• 26 Alharbi F, Almuzian M, Bearn D. Miniscrews failure rate in orthodontics: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2018; 40: 519-530
• 27 Jambi S, Walsh T, Sandler J. et al. Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 8: CD005098
• 28 Sandler J, Murray A, Thiruvenkatachari B. et al. Effectiveness of 3 methods of anchorage reinforcement for maximum anchorage in adolescents: A 3-arm multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 146: 10-20
• 29 Ganzer N, Feldmann I, Bondemark L. Anchorage reinforcement with miniscrews and molar blocks in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 154: 758-767
• 30 Ganzer N, Feldmann I, Bondemark L. Pain and discomfort following insertion of miniscrews and premolar extractions: a randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod 2016; 86: 891-899