Diagnostic performance of different cholangioscopes in patients with biliary strictures: a systematic review

Abstract

Background Cholangioscopy provides direct intraductual imaging, which can enhance diagnostic efficacy during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary strictures. This study aimed to review the diagnostic yield of different cholangioscopes for the diagnosis of malignant biliary stricture (MBS).

Methods A comprehensive literature review was performed. Full papers of prospective studies using any type of peroral cholangioscope (POC) were included without language restriction. The primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of various POCs to diagnose MBS.

Results Data from 20 published articles, involving 1141 patients, were extracted. Overall sensitivities of POCs for diagnosing MBS were higher for the diagnosis made under visual impression compared with those from cholangioscopy-guided biopsy (67 % – 100 % vs. 38 % – 100 %), whereas the overall specificities were generally high and comparable (73 % – 100 % vs. 75 % – 100 %). Newer video cholangioscopes (digital single-operator POC [digital SOC], direct POC) with the exception of video dual-operator mother – baby POC (video DOC), provided better sensitivity of cholangioscopy-guided biopsy compared with fiberoptic scopes (digital SOC 80 % – 85 %, direct POC 80 % – 100 %, video DOC 38 % – 100 %, and fiberoptic SOC 49 % – 100 %, respectively). Among these video cholangioscopes, the digital SOC provided the highest technical success rate, at 100 %.

Conclusions POCs enhanced the diagnostic yield for diagnosis of MBS. Compared with fiberoptic POCs that only provide good image impression, the digital SOC and direct POC were good at both image impression and cholangioscopy-guided biopsy to diagnose MBS. To ensure high technical success for MBS diagnosis, the digital SOC is a good option.

^* These authors contributed equally to this work.

Publication History

Received: 26 June 2019

Accepted: 22 November 2019

Article published online:
10 January 2020

• References

• 1 Xu MM, Sethi A. Diagnosing biliary malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2015; 25: 677-690
• 2 Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V. et al. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 168-176
• 3 Tabibian JH, Visrodia KH, Levy MJ. et al. Advanced endoscopic imaging of indeterminate biliary strictures. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 1268-1278
• 4 Komanduri S, Thosani N, Abu Dayyeh BK. et al. Cholangiopancreatoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 209-221
• 5 Tringali A, Lemmers A, Meves V. et al. Intraductal biliopancreatic imaging: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) technology review. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 739-753
• 6 Ishida Y, Itoi T, Okabe Y. Types of peroral cholangioscopy: how to choose the most suitable type of cholangioscopy. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2016; 14: 210-219
• 7 Weigt J, Kandulski A, Malfertheiner P. Technical improvement using ultra-slim gastroscopes for direct peroral cholangioscopy: analysis of the initial learning phase. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2015; 22: 74-78
• 8 Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Lourdusamy V. et al. Single-operator cholangioscopy and targeted biopsies in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 608-614.e2
• 9 Hu B, Sun B, Cai Q. et al. Asia-Pacific consensus guidelines for endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 44-58
• 10 Azeem N, Gostout CJ, Knipschield M. et al. Cholangioscopy with narrow-band imaging in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis undergoing ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 773-779.e2
• 11 Chen YK, Pleskow DK. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 832-841
• 12 Fukuda Y, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y. et al. Diagnostic utility of peroral cholangioscopy for various bile-duct lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 374-382
• 13 Kurihara T, Yasuda I, Isayama H. et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy in biliopancreatic diseases: prospective multicenter study in Japan. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 1891-1901
• 14 Lee YN, Moon JH, Choi HJ. et al. Direct peroral cholangioscopy for diagnosis of bile duct lesions using an I-SCAN ultraslim endoscope: a pilot study. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 675-681
• 15 Manta R, Frazzoni M, Conigliaro R. et al. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangioscopy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary lesions: a single-center, prospective, cohort study. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 1569-1572
• 16 Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Kommaraju K. et al. Digital, single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pancreatobiliary disorders: a multicenter clinical experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 649-655
• 17 Nishikawa T, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y. et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of peroral video-cholangioscopic visual findings and cholangioscopy-guided forceps biopsy findings for indeterminate biliary lesions: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 219-226
• 18 Ogura T, Imanishi M, Kurisu Y. et al. Prospective evaluation of digital single-operator cholangioscope for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures (with videos). Dig Endosc 2017; 29: 782-789
• 19 Osanai M, Itoi T, Igarashi Y. et al. Peroral video cholangioscopy to evaluate indeterminate bile duct lesions and preoperative mucosal cancerous extension: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 635-642
• 20 Parsi MA, Jang S, Sanaka M. et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic cholangiopancreatoscopy: performance of a new digital cholangioscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 936-942
• 21 Ramchandani M, Reddy DN, Gupta R. et al. Role of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary lesions: a single-center, prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 511-519
• 22 Tischendorf JJ, Kruger M, Trautwein C. et al. Cholangioscopic characterization of dominant bile duct stenoses in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 665-669
• 23 Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB. et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003; 3: 25
• 24 Arnelo U, von Seth E, Bergquist A. Prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 696-702
• 25 Draganov PV, Chauhan S, Wagh MS. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and cholangioscopy-guided sampling of indeterminate biliary lesions at the time of ERCP: a prospective, long-term follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 347-353
• 26 Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F. et al. Peroral cholangioscopic diagnosis of biliary-tract diseases by using narrow-band imaging (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 730-736
• 27 Lim P, Aggarwal V, Craig P. Role of balloon-assisted cholangioscopy in a multiethnic cohort to assess complex biliary disease (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 932-942
• 28 Meves V, Ell C, Pohl J. Efficacy and safety of direct transnasal cholangioscopy with standard ultraslim endoscopes: results of a large cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 88-94
• 29 Weigt J, Kandulski A, Malfertheiner P. Direct peroral cholangioscopy using ultraslim gastroscopes: high technical performance with important diagnostic yield. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 173-177
• 30 Chen YK, Parsi MA, Binmoeller KF. et al. Single-operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 805-814
• 31 Jang J-Y. The past, present, and future of image-enhanced endoscopy. Clin Endosc 2015; 48: 466-475