Zentralbl Chir 2020; 145(03): 252-259
DOI: 10.1055/a-1149-2247
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Robotische Ösophaguresektion (RAMIE) – Setup, Port Placement, strukturierte OP-Schritte

Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy (RAMIE) – Setup, Port Placement, Stepwise Procedure Guide
Thorben Möller
Klinik für Allgemeine-, Viszeral-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Deutschland
,
Thomas Becker
Klinik für Allgemeine-, Viszeral-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Deutschland
,
Benedikt Reichert
Klinik für Allgemeine-, Viszeral-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Deutschland
,
Jan-Hendrik Egberts
Klinik für Allgemeine-, Viszeral-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 June 2020 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die roboterassistierte Ösophagusresektion (RAMIE) kann insbesondere im thorakalen Teil der Operation die Limitationen der konventionellen minimalinvasiven Chirurgie überwinden. Durch mehr Freiheitsgrade der Bewegung und verbesserte Sicht ist insbesondere die Anastomosenanlage im robotischen Vorgehen einfacher. In der vorliegenden Arbeit stellen wir unsere etablierte RAMIE-Technik sowie die Anlage einer Dünndarmernährungssonde am Da-Vinci-Xi®-System vor. Diese unterscheidet sich insbesondere durch die nur partielle Bildung des Magenschlauches abdominell sowie die Durchführung einer End-zu-Seit-Anastomose mit Zirkularstapler und kompletter Übernähung von anderen publizierten Techniken.

Abstract

Robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy (RAMIE) can overcome the limitations of thoracoscopic surgery, particularly in the thoracic part of the operation. Thanks to more degrees of freedom of movement, anastomosis is simpler in the robotic procedure. In this work, we present our established full RAMIE-technique on the da Vinci Xi® system. Our technique is characterized by the incomplete formation of the gastric tube abdominally and an end-to-side anastomosis with a circular stapler.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Lewis I. The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus; with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg 1946; 34: 18-31
  • 2 Zhang H, Chen L, Wang Z. et al. The learning curve for robotic McKeown esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105: 1024-1030
  • 3 Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA. et al. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 1170-1176
  • 4 Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW. et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1887-1892
  • 5 van Hillegersberg R, Boone J, Draaisma WA. et al. First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1435-1439
  • 6 Yun JK, Chong BK, Kim HJ. et al. Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-weighted analysis. Dis Esophagus 2019; DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz071.
  • 7 Egberts J-H, Biebl M, Perez DR. et al. Robot-assisted oesophagectomy: recommendations towards a standardised Ivor Lewis procedure. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23: 1485-1492
  • 8 Grimminger PP, Hadzijusufovic E, Babic B. et al. Innovative fully robotic 4-arm Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (RAMIE4). Dis Esophagus 2020; 33: doz015 doi:10.1093/dote/doz015
  • 9 Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA. et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME Trial. Ann Surg 2017; 266: 232-236
  • 10 Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS. et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 152-162
  • 11 van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM. et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2019; 269: 621-630
  • 12 van der Sluis PC, Tagkalos E, Hadzijusufovic E. et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): promising results in 100 consecutive patients (the European experience). J Gastrointest Surg 2020; DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04510-8.
  • 13 Weijs TJ, Ruurda JP, Luyer MDP. et al. New insights into the surgical anatomy of the esophagus. J Thorac Dis 2017; 9: S675
  • 14 Egberts J-H, Schlemminger M, Hauser C. et al. Robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy (RACE procedure) using a single port combined with a transhiatal approach in a rendezvous technique: a case series. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404: 353-358
  • 15 Yang Y, Zhang X, Li B. et al. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy). BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 608 doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5799-6
  • 16 Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, Stein H. et al. Feasibility of transcervical robotic-assisted esophagectomy (TC-RAMIE) in a cadaver study–a future outlook for an extrapleural approach. Appl Sci 2019; 9: 3572