Endoscopy, Table of Contents Endoscopy 2020; 52(12): v50DOI: 10.1055/a-1199-8443 Author commentary Author commentary on Andrada Seicean et al. Recommend Article Abstract Full Text Andrada Seicean et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic versus standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions: a single-center prospective randomized trial In 148 patients randomized to endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) vs. contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS)-guided FNA for solid pancreatic lesions, diagnostic rates were similar, and no improvement was seen when guiding FNA by CH-EUS. Download Refers to:Contrast-enhanced harmonic versus standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions: a single-center prospective randomized trialEndoscopy 2020; 52(12): 1084-1090DOI: 10.1055/a-1193-4954