Assessment of the Efficacy of Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery Techniques using an Oculopression Stress Test

Abstract

Background Glaucoma is one of the most common causes of blindness worldwide. The only evidence-based treatment to slow down the progression of glaucoma is the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) using local medication or through surgery. During the last years, a large number of microinvasive glaucoma surgery techniques (MIGS) has been developed, in order to reduce the IOP in glaucoma patients safely and effectively. Until now, efficacy of MIGS has been assessed mainly according to the postoperative IOP and the number of medications used. Results from long-term studies are rare or not available in the majority of the cases. In order to better evaluate the functionality of MIGS, a new examination method has been developed with the help of a new oculopressor device. In this study the efficacy of different MIGS techniques will be examined using the new oculopressor.

Material/Methods At first, glaucoma patients that had previously received a MIGS surgery (iStent inject, XEN Stent, ELT) were examined with the new oculopression test. Their results were compared with those of non-operated patients and healthy individuals. Overall, 38 healthy subjects (group 1), 10 non-operated patients (group 2), 19 patients after iStent inject implantation (group 3), 14 patients after XEN Stent implantation (group 4) and 5 patients after ELT (group 5) were examined. The new examination measures the IOP-reduction that occurs after oculopression and can be seen as an indirect measurement of the outflow facility of the eye.

Results The IOP-reduction after oculopression differed among the study groups. Non-operated patients showed a significantly lower IOP-reduction compared to healthy individuals. Patients after iStent inject and XEN stent implantation showed a larger reduction of IOP after oculopression in relation to non-operated patients and their results approximated those of healthy individuals. These patients needed fewer medications postoperatively in relation to non-operated patients. Patients after ELT showed postoperatively a smaller reduction of IOP after oculopression compared to iStent inject and XEN stent patients.

Conclusion MIGS can increase the outflow facility of the eye in patients with glaucoma. Though ELT had the lowest impact on the aqueous outflow among the studied procedures in this study. The new test can help in the evaluation of current and further development of new MIGS in the future.

Key words

glaucoma - MIGS - oculopression - outflow facility - microinvasive glaucoma surgery

Publication History

Received: 07 February 2020

Accepted: 01 July 2020

Article published online:
23 September 2020

• References/Literatur

• 1 Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY. et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2081-2090 doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
• 2 Wolfram C, Pfeiffer N. Weißbuch zur Situation der ophthalmologischen Versorgung in Deutschland, September 2012. München: Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft. Im Internet (Stand: 11.09.2020): https://www.dog.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/DOG_Weissbuch_2012_fin.pdf
• 3 Choi J, Kook MS. Systemic and ocular hemodynamic risk factors in glaucoma. Biomed Res Int 2015; DOI: 10.1155/2015/141905.
• 4 Gazzard G, Foster PJ, Devereux JG. et al. Intraocular pressure and visual field loss in primary angle closure and primary open angle glaucomas. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 720-725 doi:10.1136/bjo.87.6.720
• 5 Spaeth GL, Marques Pereira ML. How does resetting intraocular pressure help optic nerve function. Eye (Lond) 2000; 14: 476-487 doi:10.1038/eye.2000.134
• 6 Jünemann AGM, Huchzermeyer C, Rejdak R. Medikamentöse Glaukomtherapie. Ophthalmologe 2013; 110: 1134-1148 doi:10.1007/s00347-012-2671-3
• 7 Diestelhorst M, Larsson LI. A 12-week, randomized, double-masked, multicenter study of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol in the evening versus the individual components. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 70-76 doi:10.1016/j.ophtha-2005.06.027
• 8 Diestelhorst M. Medikamentöse Therapie und Verlaufskontrolle der Glaukome. Ophthalmologe 2013; 110: 1132-1133 doi:10.1007/s00347-013-2945-4
• 9 Allingham RR. Shields Textbook of Glaucoma. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011
• 10 Anonymous European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 4th Edition – Chapter 3: Treatment principles and options. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; 101: 130-195 doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-EGSguideline.003
• 11 Pillunat LE, Erb C, Jünemann AG. et al. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS): a review of surgical procedures using stents. Clin Ophthalmol 2017; 11: 1583-1600 doi:10.2147/OPTH.S135316
• 12 Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Funk J. Laserchirurgie und Glaukom: Excimer-Laser-Trabekulotomie. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2006; 223: 303-307 doi:10.1055/s-2005-858861
• 13 Grant WM. Tonographic method for measuring the facility and rate of aqueous flow in human eyes. Arch Ophthal 1950; 44: 204-214 doi:10.1001/archopht.1950.00910020209003
• 14 Leydhecker W. Klinische Bedeutung der Tonographie und des Tonographietests. Doc Ophthalmol 1968; 25: 100-112 doi:10.1007/BF02550819
• 15 Ulrich WD, Ulrich C, Neunhöffer E. et al. Okulo-Pressions-Tonometrie (OPT) – ein neues tonographisches Verfahren zur Glaukomdiagnostik. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1987; 190: 109-113 doi:10.1055/2-2008-1050339
• 16 Stodtmeister R, Pillunat LE, Brenner F. Beurteilung der Kammerwasserdynamik mit der Okulopressionstonometrie nach Ulrich. Ophthalmologica 1988; 196: 57-66 doi:10.1159/000309877
• 17 Kopp F, Koschmieder A, Stahnke T. et al. Entwicklung eines Okulopressors zur Evaluation der Funktionalität von Glaukomdrainage-Implantaten. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2018; 235: 1360-1365 doi:10.1055/a-0792-1247
• 18 Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D. et al. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 80-84 doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.061
• 19 Huang AS, Francis BA, Weinreb RN. Structural and functional imaging of aqueous humor outflow. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 46: 158-168 doi:10.111/ceo.13064
• 20 Prata TS, De Moraes CG, Kanadani FN. et al. Posture-induced intraocular pressure changes: considerations regarding body position in glaucoma patients. Surv Ophthalmol 2010; 55: 445-453 doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.12.002
• 21 Sultan M, Blondeau P. Episcleral venous pressure in younger and older subjects in the sitting and supine positions. J Glaucoma 2003; 12: 370-373 doi:10.1097/00061198-200308000-00013