Suchttherapie 2021; 22(02): 86-90
DOI: 10.1055/a-1404-4936
Originalarbeit

Anonyme Alkoholiker wirksamer als Psychotherapie?

Eine kritische Analyse des Cochrane-Reviews von Kelly, Humphreys und Ferri 2020Alcoholics Anonymous more Efficient than Psychotherapy? A Critical Analysis of the Cochrane-Review of Kelly, Humphreys and Ferri 2020
Gallus Bischof
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Lübeck
,
Anja Bischof
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Lübeck
,
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Lübeck
› Author Affiliations

Zusammenfassung

Eine 2020 veröffentlichte, aktualisierte Cochrane-Analyse zu Anonymen Alkoholikern und 12-Schritte Programmen zur Behandlung alkoholbezogener Störungen schreibt diesen Interventionsformen eine bessere Evidenz gegenüber etablierten psychotherapeutischen Verfahren zu. Der Beitrag stellt zentrale Befunde des Reviews vor und überprüft deren interne und externe Validität. Diese sind eingeschränkt durch die verwendeten Definitionen der Outcomeparameter, der Interventions- und Kontrollbedingungen, die Selektivität der berichteten Ergebnisse und die eingeschränkte Generalisierbarkeit der Stichproben.

Abstract

A 2020 published Cochrane-Review on “Alcoholics Anonymous” and other 12-step programs for alcohol use disorders suggests that these interventions are more effective than established psychotherapeutic interventions. This article presents main findings of the review and discusses their internal and external validity. Validity is restricted due to the outcome measures used, the definition of intervention and control conditions, a selective reporting of results and limited generalizability of samples.



Publication History

Article published online:
01 April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Kelly JF, Humphreys K, Ferri M. Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programs for alcohol use disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 3: Cd012880 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012880.pub2
  • 2 Meyer R. Referiert: Suchtkranke: Anonyme Alkoholiker wirksamer als Therapien. Deutsches Ärzteblatt PP 2020; 6: 278
  • 3 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie (DGPPN), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Suchtforschung und Suchttherapie e.V. (DG-SUCHT). S-3 Leitline Screening, Diagnose und Behandlung alkoholbezogener Störungen. https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/076-001.html 2020
  • 4 Heather N. Let’s not turn back the clock: Comments on Kelly et al., “Alcoholics Anonymous and 12-Step Facilitation Treatments for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Distillation of a 2020 Cochrane Review for Clinicians and Policy Makers”. Alcohol Alcohol. 2020: 1-3 doi:10.1093/alcalc/agaa137
  • 5 Peele S. So Alcoholics Anonymous Is “Proven” to Work After All?. Not So Fast. https://filtermag.org/alcoholics-anonymous-cochrane/amp/ 2020
  • 6 Kaskutas LA. Alcoholics anonymous effectiveness: faith meets science. J Addict Dis 2009; 28: 145-157 doi:10.1080/10550880902772464
  • 7 Ferri M, Amato L, Davoli M. Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programmes for alcohol dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005032.pub2 Cd005032
  • 8 Witkiewitz K, Hallgren KA, Kranzler HR. et al. Clinical Validation of Reduced Alcohol Consumption After Treatment for Alcohol Dependence Using the World Health Organization Risk Drinking Levels. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2017; 41: 179-186 DOI: 10.1111/acer.13272.
  • 9 Witkiewitz K, Kirouac M, Roos CR. et al. Abstinence and low risk drinking during treatment: Association with psychosocial functioning, alcohol use, and alcohol problems 3 years following treatment. Psychology of addictive behaviors: journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors 2018; 32: 639-646 DOI: 10.1037/adb0000381.
  • 10 Marlatt GA, Gordon JR. Hrsg Relapse prevention. Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. New York: Guilford Press; 1985
  • 11 Heather N, Winton M, Rollnick S. An empirical test of “a cultural delusion of alcoholics”. Psychol Rep 1982; 50: 379-382 doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.50.2.379
  • 12 Miller WR, Westerberg VS, Harris RJ. et al. What predicts relapse? Prospective testing of antecedent models. Addiction 1996; 91: 155-172
  • 13 Vederhus JK, Timko C, Kristensen O. et al. Motivational intervention to enhance post-detoxification 12-Step group affiliation: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction 2014; 109: 766-773 DOI: 10.1111/add.12471.
  • 14 Davis WT, Campbell L, Tax J. et al. A trial of “standard” outpatient alcoholism treatment vs. a minimal treatment control. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002; 23: 9-19 DOI: 10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00227-1.
  • 15 McCrady BS, Epstein EE, Hirsch LS. Maintaining change after conjoint behavioral alcohol treatment for men: outcomes at 6 months. Addiction 1999; 94: 1381-1396 doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.949138110.x
  • 16 Kelly JF, Kaminer Y, Kahler CW. et al. A pilot randomized clinical trial testing integrated 12-Step facilitation (iTSF) treatment for adolescent substance use disorder. Addiction 2017; 112: 2155-2166 DOI: 10.1111/add.13920.
  • 17 Project Match Research Group Matching alcoholism treatments to clients heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1997; 58: 7-29
  • 18 Carroll KM, Connors GJ, Cooney NL. et al. Internal validity of Project MATCH treatments: discriminability and integrity. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66: 290-303 DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.66.2.290.
  • 19 Litt MD, Kadden RM, Kabela-Cormier E. et al. Changing network support for drinking: initial findings from the network support project. J Consult Clin Psychol 2007; 75: 542-555 DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.542.
  • 20 Litt MD, Kadden RM, Tennen H. et al. Network Support II: Randomized controlled trial of Network Support treatment and cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend 2016; 165: 203-212 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.06.010.
  • 21 Bowen S, Witkiewitz K, Clifasefi SL. et al. Relative efficacy of mindfulness-based relapse prevention, standard relapse prevention, and treatment as usual for substance use disorders: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71: 547-556 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4546.
  • 22 McCrady BS, Noel NE, Abrams DB. et al. Comparative effectiveness of three types of spouse involvement in outpatient behavioral alcoholism treatment. J Stud Alcohol 1986; 47: 459-467 DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1986.47.459.
  • 23 Lydecker KP, Tate SR, Cummins KM. et al. Clinical outcomes of an integrated treatment for depression and substance use disorders. Psychology of addictive behaviors: journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors 2010; 24: 453-465 DOI: 10.1037/a0019943.
  • 24 Brown TG, Seraganian P, Tremblay J. et al. Process and outcome changes with relapse prevention versus 12-Step aftercare programs for substance abusers. Addiction 2002; 97: 677-689 DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00101.x.
  • 25 Brooks AJ, Penn PE. Comparing treatments for dual diagnosis: twelve-step and self-management and recovery training. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2003; 29: 359-383 doi:10.1081/ada-120020519
  • 26 Walitzer KS, Dermen KH, Barrick C. Facilitating involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous during out-patient treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Addiction 2009; 104: 391-401 doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02467.x
  • 27 Holder HD, Cisler RA, Longabaugh R. et al. Alcoholism treatment and medical care costs from Project MATCH. Addiction 2000; 95: 999-1013 DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9579993.x.
  • 28 Humphreys K, Moos RH. Encouraging posttreatment self-help group involvement to reduce demand for continuing care services: two-year clinical and utilization outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2007; 31: 64-68 doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00273.x
  • 29 Humphreys K, Moos R. Can encouraging substance abuse patients to participate in self-help groups reduce demand for health care? A quasi-experimental study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2001; 25: 711-716