Keywords
trauma - PTSD - stress - metabolic disorders during pregnancy - gestational diabetes
mellitus - hypertensive disorders of pregnancy - fetal growth restriction
Metabolic disorders during pregnancy, which include gestational diabetes mellitus
(GDM), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), and fetal growth restriction (FGR),
are adverse health outcomes that jeopardize the wellbeing of both pregnant persons
and their offspring during and beyond gestation. During gestation, physiological adaptations
across multiple tissue and organ systems occur in unison to meet the energy demands
of the growing fetus.[1] These adaptations create a metabolic challenge that increases risk for gestational
metabolic disorders. Increased risk for gestational metabolic dysfunction is reflected
in the prevalence of prenatal metabolic disorders, with baseline rates in the United
States for GDM ranging from 5 to 10% and HDP and FGR around 3 to 10%.[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
The burden of metabolic disorders during pregnancy is disproportionately distributed
among racial-ethnic lines, as demonstrated by higher GDM rates among Asian and Hispanic/Latinx
populations,[6] higher HDP rates among black and Hispanic/Latinx populations,[7] and higher FGR rates among black populations[1]
[8] relative to white populations. Additionally, non-white pregnant persons have a higher
risk for adverse outcomes when diagnosed with gestational metabolic disorders. Preeclampsia,
a subset of HDP, is the second leading cause of maternal mortality[6]; the risk for severe morbidity is 9.8 and 7.7% in non-Hispanic black and Hispanic/Latinx
pregnant persons respectively, compared with 6.1% morbidity risk in white pregnant
persons.[9] Gestational hypertension (GHTN) prevalence shows similar racial-ethnic inequities,
with non-Hispanic black and Hispanic/Latinx pregnant persons at higher risk for pregnancy-associated
stroke than white pregnant persons and nonpregnant persons.[2]
[3] Given the dangers of gestational metabolic dysfunction, it is essential to identify
risk factors that alter metabolic physiology in pregnancy and understand how those
risk factors contribute to racial-ethnic disparities in pregnancy-related health.
Risk factors for gestational metabolic disease include age, income, family history,
preexisting metabolic disease like type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and high blood
pressure.[4]
[5]
[6]
[7] However, when controlling for these risk factors, pregnant persons of color, in
particular black pregnant persons, still experience increased rates of gestational
metabolic disease as compared with non-Hispanic white pregnant persons, indicating
that psychosocial factors may modify gestational metabolic health as well.[8] Trauma exposure and resulting posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are two psychosocial
risk factors that may contribute to gestational metabolic dysfunction and associated
racial-ethnic health disparities. Traumatic stress exposure leads to set of maladaptive
physiological responses that adversely impact overall health, including behavioral
health.[10] PTSD is a psychiatric disorder that occurs after exposure to a traumatic event and
adversely impacts individuals' mood and fear responses.[9] Critically, non-white nonpregnant individuals, particularly black and Latinx/Hispanic
individuals, are exposed to higher rates of traumatic events and suffer more from
PTSD.[11]
[12]
[13]
[14] This increased exposure to trauma and PTSD in non-white populations not only impacts
mental health but may also adversely impact metabolic function. In particular, trauma
exposure and PTSD are associated with increased risk for the development of T2DM,[13] hypertension[14] and cardiovascular disease in nonpregnant populations.[15] Exposure to trauma and PTSD negatively impact multiple biological systems, including
the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis (HPA) stress
systems, whose dysregulation can lead to heightened systemic inflammation.[1]
[15]
[16] Dysregulation of these physiological systems maintains the body in a catabolic state
of glucose production, predisposing individuals to increased risk of metabolic dysfunction.[16]
[17]
[18]
Despite the link between trauma, PTSD, and metabolic dysfunction in nonpregnant persons,
it remains unclear how trauma and PTSD impact risk for metabolic dysfunction in pregnancy
and associated pregnancy-related health disparities. Thus, in the current narrative
review, we will summarize and synthesize significant findings to date that address
the association between trauma and PTSD and gestational metabolic diseases including
GDM, HDP, FGR, and low birth weight (LBW). To contextualize relevant findings, we
first discuss underlying biological mechanisms by which trauma exposure and PTSD act
as chronic stressors that lead to metabolic dysfunction in nonpregnant persons. Following,
we assess and evaluate findings form the limited studies that address the relationship
between metabolic dysfunction in pregnant persons and traumatic stress exposure and
PTSD, while highlighting socioeconomic and racial-ethnic study demographics. Uncovering
the biological mechanisms that underlie gestational metabolic risk is critical to
developing preventive and interventional treatments for pregnant persons at high risk
for gestational metabolic disease. Ultimately, understanding the role of trauma and
PTSD in gestational metabolic dysfunction is a crucial component in better understanding
the biological mechanisms that underlie racial-ethnic and socioeconomic pregnancy-related
health disparities and associated infant health complications.
Biological Pathways Underlying Stress Effects on Metabolism Outside of the Context
of Pregnancy
Biological Pathways Underlying Stress Effects on Metabolism Outside of the Context
of Pregnancy
Overview of the Physiological Stress Response Systems
The stress response is a broad term that refers to any physiological change in response
to a physical or psychological stimulus (stressor) that is perceived as a danger to
an individual.[17] The stress response evolved to promote the survival of organisms and is composed
of the co-activation of the fast-acting ANS, which activates the immune system to
prepare for potential wounding, and the slower acting HPA axis. The ANS is divided
into the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the parasympathetic nervous system (PSNS),
which work in a complimentary fashion alongside the HPA axis to regulate physiological
and behavioral responses when danger is detected.[18] During exposure to an acute stressor, the SNS and HPA axis signal the release of
epinephrine and cortisol from the adrenal glands, respectively. These hormones work
in tandem to increase heart rate, respiration rate, and blood vessel dilation to increase
the availability of oxygen to accommodate the body's perceived emergency state.[19] HPA axis-induced release of cortisol initiates catabolic processes in liver, fat,
and muscle tissue via activation of glucocorticoid receptors, therefore increasing
glucose availability that is critical for providing the body and brain with an adequate
energy supply in the face of an acute stressor.[20]
The ANS and HPA axis also stimulate and inhibit inflammatory processes, respectively,
in response to acute stress.[21] More specifically, these two stress systems work in tandem: epinephrine quickly
stimulates the immune system to increase blood levels of inflammatory cytokines,[22] while slower acting cortisol-driven negative-feedback mechanisms of the HPA axis
inhibit the ANS-driven inflammatory response, preventing inflammatory cytokines from
damaging important organ systems.[22]
[23] After the eminent threat of the acute stressor has subsided, both the ANS and HPA
axis act to return homeostasis. Specifically, SNS activity is downregulated and that
of the PSNS is upregulated.[24] Similarly, HPA-axis negative feedback inhibition of the HPA axis by glucocorticoids
results in termination of the neuroendocrine stress response.[19]
[25] While exposure to acute stressors initiates this short-term adaptive stress response,
exposure to prolonged and repeated stressors dysregulates ANS, HPA axis, and inflammatory
functions, leading to dysfunction of critical bodily processes, including metabolism.[10] As common and debilitating chronic stressors, repeated exposure to trauma (e.g.,
traumatic stressors) and resulting PTSD are important risk factors to consider in
the context of metabolic dysfunction.
ANS Dysregulation and Adverse Impacts on Metabolic Function
Exposure to traumatic stressors leads to continuous hyperactivation of the SNS, which
hinders the normal counteraction of the PSNS and disturbs ANS homeostasis ([Fig. 1A]).[26] Specific to metabolism, traumatic stress induces an increase in epinephrine and
norepinephrine release by the ANS, leading to maintenance of high heart rate, blood
pressure, and serum cortisol, as well as a reduction in heart rate variability (HRV),
all of which are linked to the development of metabolic diseases such as diabetes
and hypertension in the general population.[27]
[28]
[29]
[30] Similarly, ANS dysfunction has been repeatedly implicated as a likely underlying
biomechanism linking PTSD and metabolic dysfunction.[31] Key PTSD symptoms such as re-experiencing, where an individual involuntarily relives
the traumatic event via flashbacks and nightmares,[32] and hyperarousal, a cluster of symptoms including hypervigilance and heightened
startle reaction, are associated with increased release of norepinephrine, low HRV,
and high blood pressure,[33]
[34]
[35] indicating that ANS dysfunction may contribute to the high comorbidity between PTSD
and metabolic dysfunction in nonpregnant individuals.[36]
[37]
Fig. 1 Parallel impacts of trauma and PTSD (A) and pregnancy (B) on physiology. (A) Trauma exposure and PTSD lead to dysregulation of the sympathetic
nervous system (SNS) and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (ANS) axis. Downstream,
dysregulation of the major stress axes leads to an increase in inflammatory markers
and dysregulation in metabolic processes such as glucose and insulin production and
sensitivity, leptin release and lipogenesis. (B) SNS and HPA axis adaptations during
gestation. Normal pregnancy is accompanied by adaptive physiological shifts in both
the SNS and HPA axis, including a reduction in HRV and an increase in cortisol and
ACTH, respectively. To accommodate increasing fetal energy demands, gestation is also
accompanied by hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. To prevent rejection of the growing
fetus by the pregnant person's immune system, there is a shift toward an anti-inflammatory
state during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Illustration by Bona Kim;
reproduced with permission of ©Emory University. HRV, heart rate variability; PTSD,
posttraumatic stress disorder.
HPA Axis Dysregulation and Adverse Impacts on Metabolic Function
Exposure to repeated traumatic stressors leads to dysregulation of the HPA axis and
increased glucocorticoid release ([Fig. 1A]).[19] Chronic exposure to elevated glucocorticoids deteriorates the negative feedback
control of the HPA axis via down-regulation of glucocorticoid receptor expression
in the brain.[38] Disinhibition of glucocorticoid release then leads to a chronic catabolic state,
where there is continuous increase of glucose production, degradation of protein and
muscle mass, and antagonization of anabolic hormones.[39] Additionally, trauma exposure is also associated with decreased levels of neuropeptide
Y (NPY), an orexigenic neuropeptide that also has anxiolytic properties.[40] Together, such neuroendocrine changes have detrimental effects on metabolism, namely
leading to a decrease in lean body mass, an increase in visceral body fat, and the
development of hyperglycemia and insulin resistance.[41]
[42]
[43] Left untreated, such metabolic changes can progress into metabolic disorders in
nonpregnant populations.[44]
[45]
The development and maintenance of PTSD symptoms are due in part to altered HPA axis
function.[46]
[47] Alterations in glucocorticoid function have been described in individuals with PTSD,
including reduced glucocorticoid response to acute stressors,[48] elevated glucocorticoid receptor levels,[49] and an enhanced glucocorticoid negative feedback mechanism.[50] PTSD is also associated with low baseline levels of NPY.[51] Animal studies also suggest that increased sensitivity of the glucocorticoid receptor,
as is found in PTSD, upregulates gene expression of genes implicated in metabolic
pathways, including NPY and adiponectin 1, key regulators of appetite and insulin
sensitivity, respectively.[52]
[53] Similar neuroendocrine changes have been described in obesity and metabolic syndrome
in the general population, metabolic disorders that are highly comorbid with PTSD
in trauma-exposed persons.[16]
[54] It remains unclear, however, whether HPA axis dysregulation may induce behavioral
changes in appetite and physical activity in individuals with trauma and PTSD that
contribute to metabolic dysfunction.
Increased Inflammation Resulting from ANS and HPA dysfunction and Impacts on Metabolic
Function
ANS and HPA axis dysregulation leads to heightened systemic inflammation that has
detrimental impacts on multiple physiological functions, including metabolism ([Fig. 1A]).[55] Under chronic stress conditions, the HPA axis releases an excess of cortisol,[56] which enhances the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin
(IL)-1β and IL-18.[57] Concurrently, heightened norepinephrine release as a result traumatic stress exposure
promotes the secretion of inflammatory factors including tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα),
a major regulator of the inflammatory response, and IL-6, a pro-inflammatory cytokine.[58]
[59]
The ANS and HPA-axis dysregulation present in PTSD can also result in increased systemic
inflammation.[60] For example, elevated serum catecholamines characteristic of PTSD are associated
with an increase in pro-inflammatory mediators, primarily prostaglandins.[61] Individuals with PTSD show higher concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6),[62] IL-1b,[63] as well as greater gene expression and activity of nuclear factor-kappa betta (NF-kB),
a master transcriptional activator of pro-inflammatory markers that is regulated by
glucocorticoid receptor activity.[64]
[65] Additionally, polymorphisms in inflammatory genes, such as CRP, are associated with increased risk for augmented systemic inflammation,[66] as well as PTSD and psychophysiological hyperarousal in trauma-exposed individuals.[67] This excess pro-inflammatory activity in PTSD is coincident with increased levels
of inflammation in metabolic disease including T2DM.[68]
Overall, existing data suggest that traumatic events and PTSD act as chronic stressors
to impact metabolism in nonpregnant individuals via ANS and HPA-axis dysregulation
and heightened systemic inflammation. Augmented levels of IL-6, IL-1β, and TNFα contribute
to insulin resistance and hyperglycemia in people with T2DM,[69]
[70] while IL-18 is closely associated with metabolic syndrome.[71] This suggests that trauma exposure and resulting PTSD may be two psychosocial risk
factors that may contribute to racial-ethnic health disparities in gestational metabolic
dysfunction. In the following section, we will review what is currently known regarding
the relationships between trauma, PTSD, and gestational metabolic dysfunction in pregnant
individuals.
Stress and Metabolic Dysfunction in Pregnancy
Stress and Metabolic Dysfunction in Pregnancy
Pregnancy is a period of metabolic adaptations directed toward meeting dynamic maternal–fetal
energy requirements ([Fig. 1B]).[35]
[72] Metabolic adaptations in pregnancy are divided into anabolic and catabolic stages,
the first which involves maternal accumulation of fat and nutrient stores during the
beginning two trimesters of pregnancy, followed by a breakdown of lipid reserves and
transferring of nutrients to the rapidly growing fetus during the third trimester.[72]
[73]
[74] Normal pregnancy shifts the activity of the major stress systems, leading to reduction
in HRV via the SNS and increase in cortisol and ACTH secretion by the HPA-axis.[75]
[76]
[77] To meet dynamic energy demands of both the growing fetus and pregnant person, gestation
induces hyperglycemia and insulin resistance.[78]
[79] Lastly, during the last two trimesters of pregnancy, the pregnant person's immune
system shifts toward an anti-inflammatory state to prevent rejection of the fetus.[80]
[81] While these metabolic shifts are essential to the survival of the maternal–fetal
unit, adaptations may surpass normal pregnancy parameters, leading to gestational
metabolic dysfunction and in more severe cases, gestational metabolic disorders.[82] Among factors that can contribute to gestational metabolic dysfunction, trauma and
PTSD warrant further exploration.
Relationships between Trauma, PTSD, and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
GDM is a subtype of diabetes seen in pregnant people without preexisting diabetes
characterized by exaggerated disinhibition of glucose production.[83] In normal pregnancy, there is a transfer of glucose from pregnant person to fetus
via simple and facilitated diffusion through the placenta. This process occurs in
stages, beginning with pancreatic β-cell hyperplasia during early pregnancy to increase
insulin release and maintain glucose tolerance at a normal or slightly improved level,
as compared with an individual's nonpregnant state.[84] During the second half of gestation, to increase glucose supply for the growing
fetus there is a decrease in maternal insulin sensitivity.[85] To counter insulin resistance inherent to pregnancy, the pregnant person's body
upregulates insulin production, a process believed to occur through the expansion
of pancreatic β-cells.[86] In GDM, however, such compensatory mechanism is insufficient, leading to the pregnant
person being unable to upregulate insulin production to counter gestational insulin
resistance, resulting in hyperglycemia.[87]
Similar to hyperglycemia in nonpregnant populations, trauma and PTSD are associated
with GDM ([Table 1]). A current PTSD diagnosis is associated with an increased risk of GDM in a large,
racially diverse sample of pregnant veterans.[88] Associations between early life trauma and GDM, however, are equivocal such that
one study suggests an almost 30 to 40% increased risk for GDM among a white population
with severe childhood physical abuse,[89] and on the contrary, another suggested this association only with the presence of
prepregnancy depression in a similar demographic group.[90] However, only one of these studies[90] controlled for previous GDM and diet, two key risk factors for the development of
GDM.
Table 1
Relationship between trauma, PTSD, chronic stress, and GDM
GDM
|
|
Reference
|
Stress/trauma subtype
|
Association with GDM
|
Sample size (N)
|
Racial-ethnic demographics
|
Income
|
Education
|
Trauma
|
Mason et al, 2016
|
Early life abuse
|
↑
|
45,550
|
NW: 46%
|
Not reported
|
SC + : 100%
|
Schoenaker et al, 2019
|
Adverse childhood experiences
|
—
|
6,317
|
Not reported
|
Not reported
|
<HS: 21.4%
SC: 21.5%
C: 57.1%
|
PTSD
|
Shaw et al, 2017
|
PTSD in pregnant veterans
|
↑
|
15,986
|
W, NH: 64.2%
B, NH: 23%
O: 11%
|
Not reported
|
Not reported
|
Chronic stress
|
Hosler et al, 2011
|
>5 stressful events 12 months before birth
|
↑
|
2,690
|
W, NH: 73.4%
B, NH: 9.1%
H: 12.1%
A: 3.1%
O: 2.2%
|
Not reported
|
<HS: 15.3%
HS: 22.4%
SC + : 62.3%
|
Records et al, 2015
|
Any chronic stressor 12 months before birth
|
—
|
3,655
|
W, NH: 85.5%
H: 1.2%
|
Not reported
|
<HS: 10.9%
HS: 19.3%
SC: 39.4
SC + : 30.4
|
Silveira et al, 2014
|
Increase in stress during pregnancy
|
↑
|
1,115
|
H: 100%
|
Less than or equal to 15k: 28.6%
15k–30k: 14.4%; greater than or equal to 30k: 6.8%
|
<HS: 45.9%
HS: 31.3%
SC + : 18.8%
|
Mishra et al, 2020
|
Antenatal stress
|
↑
|
373
|
A: 100%
|
No info
|
<HS: 49.2%
HS + : 23.7%
|
MacGregor et al, 2020
|
Perceived discrimination
|
↑
|
595
|
W, NH: 61.8%
B, NH: 16.6%
H: 15.6%
O: 5.8%
|
Less than or equal to 15k: 14.6%
>15k–50k: 34.79
>100K: 22%
|
Less than or equal to HS: 32.2%
SC: 24.2%
C/C + : 43.3%
|
Abbreviations: GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder.
Note: Race and ethnicity: W, NH: white non-Hispanic; B, NH: black non-Hispanic; H:
Hispanic; A: Asian; I: indigenous; O: other; MR: multiracial; NW: non-white.
Education: <HS: less than high school; HS: high school; SC: some college; SC + : some
college or more; C: college; G: graduate school; T: training program/certification.
↑: positive association found; —: no association found.
The associations between trauma or PTSD and GDM are further supported by studies that
have established a relationship between nontraumatic chronic stressors and GDM. For
example, increases in perceived psychosocial stress from early to mid-pregnancy is
associated with a 2.6-fold increased odds of GDM and an increase in glucose level
in a majority low-income Hispanic sample.[91] Similarly, the odds of GDM are 13-fold higher among individuals with high antenatal
perceived stress compared with individuals with low antenatal stress in a sample of
women from Karnataka, India.[92] Moreover, in a racially diverse sample, perceived discrimination is associated with
increased risk of developing GDM.[93] Experiencing greater than five stressful events (including financial and job issues,
interpersonal problems, moving, etc.) within 12 months before birth is associated
with GDM in a primarily white and college-educated sample.[94] However, a study with similar demographics found no association between chronic
stress 12 months before birth and GDM.[95]
Relationships between Trauma, PTSD and Low Birth Weight and Fetal Growth Restriction
LBW is defined as infant birthweight of less than 2,000 g. Infants with LBW are at
an increased risk of chronic illnesses later in life including diabetes and hypertension.[96] In cases when LBW falls below the 10th percentile for gestational age, infants are
diagnosed with FGR. FGR impacts 5 to 10% of pregnancies in which the fetus fails to
reach its growth potential in utero and affects essential bodily functions in offspring
including breathing, immunity, and cognition, making it a particularly dangerous pregnancy
complication.[97] The metabolic origins of LBW and FGR are complicated, with studies implicating reduced
supply of nutrients,[98] higher maternal–fetal glucose concentrations,[99] and reduced amino acid delivery[100] in the development of LBW and FGR. Seeking to uncover psychosocial risk factors,
a handful of studies have explored the connection between trauma, PTSD, and risk for
LBW and FGR.
Existing literature suggests that trauma and PTSD are associated with LBW but not
FGR ([Table 2]). Racial trauma, specifically experiencing or witnessing racism during childhood,
leads to an increase in diastolic blood pressure during the last two trimesters of
pregnancy, which is associated with LBW in a sample of black American women.[101] Similarly, high maternal lifetime traumatic stress (e.g., natural disasters, childhood
maltreatment, interpersonal violence, sexual assault) resulting in increased prenatal
hair cortisol is associated with infant LBW but not FGR in male offspring in a study
within a primarily low-income Hispanic and black sample.[102] PTSD diagnosis is associated with LBW but not FGR in a racially diverse sample of
Hurricane Katrina survivors.[103] Similarly, in a large sample of displaced Pakistani women, PTSD is independently
associated with LBW.[104] PTSD resulting from intimate partner violence has also been associated with LBW
in a racially diverse and majority low-income study cohort.[105] In contrast, a study conducted in a Latinx population with variable trauma type
exposures found no association with PTSD and LBW, but did find a relationship between
PTSD diagnosis and preterm delivery.[106] Equivocal findings in these two studies may be due to use of different PTSD measures,
a long-form scale adapted from the University of Michigan Composite International
Diagnostic review[105] and the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version,[106] respectively.
Table 2
Relationship between trauma, PTSD, chronic stress, and LBW or FGR
LBW and FGR
|
|
Reference
|
Stress/trauma subtype
|
Association with LBW
|
Association with FGR
|
Sample size (N)
|
Racial-ethnic demographics
|
Income
|
Education
|
Trauma
|
Hilmert et al, 2014
|
Childhood racial trauma
|
↑
|
|
39
|
B, NH: 100%
|
2,350 (167)
reported as mean (SD)
|
>HS: 35.9%
SC: 46.2%
C: 15.4%
G: 2.6%
|
Flom et al, 2018
|
Lifetime traumatic stress
|
↑
|
—
|
314
|
W, NH: 33%
B, NH: 26%
H: 41%
|
Majority lower income
|
Less than or equal to 12: 63%
Greater than 12: 37%
reported in years
|
PTSD
|
Rosen et al, 2007
|
PTSD due to intimate partner violence
|
↑
|
|
148
|
B, NH: 54.1%
|
73% low income
|
35.4% >HS
|
Gelaye et al, 2020
|
PTSD due to variable trauma
|
⏤
|
|
4,408
|
H: 77.8%
|
Not reported
|
<6: 2.9%; 7–12: 49.9%; >12: 47.2%
|
Xiong et al, 2008
|
PTSD due to natural disasters
|
↑
|
|
219
|
W, NH: 53.8%
B, NH: 41.6%
O:14.6%
|
<20k: 24.9%
20k–60k: 39%
>60k: 36.1%
|
Not reported
|
Rashid et al, 2020
|
PTSD in war-displaced women
|
↑
|
|
450
|
A: 100%
|
<10k Pakistani rupee: 72%
|
<5: 59%
(reported in years)
|
Chronic stress
|
Rondó et al, 2003
|
Psychosocial stress during 2nd and 3rd trimester
|
↑
|
—
|
865
|
H: 100%
|
0–1: 24%
1–2: 34.7%
2–3%: 20%
>3: 21.3% - reported as per capita income
|
<4: 8.9%
4–8: 57.0%
>8: 34.1%
reported in years
|
Brown et al, 2019
|
Perceived medical discrimination
|
↑
|
|
344
|
I: 100%
|
Not reported
|
>HS: 47.5%
T: 46.0%
C: 6.5%
|
Abbreviations: FGR, fetal growth restriction; LBW, low birth weight; PTSD, posttraumatic
stress disorder.
Note: Race and ethnicity: W, NH: white non-Hispanic; B, NH: black non-Hispanic; H:
Hispanic; A: Asian; I: indigenous; O: other; MR: multiracial; NW: non-white.
Education: <HS: less than high school; HS: high school; SC: some college; SC + : some
college or more; C: college; G: graduate school; T: training program/certification.
↑: positive association found; —: no association found.
The associations between trauma and PTSD and LBW are further supported by studies
that have established a relationship between nontraumatic chronic stressors and GDM.
For example, maternal perceived stress during the second and third trimester is associated
with LBW and preterm delivery, but not FGR, in a Brazilian Latinx low-income sample.[107] Additionally, perceived medical discrimination is associated with increased risk
for LBW in a cohort of Aboriginal Australian women.[108]
Relationships between Trauma, PTSD and Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia
GHTN is defined as persistent blood pressure readings higher than 140 mmHg systolic
or 90 mmHg diastolic pressure in a woman who was normotensive prior to 20-weeks gestational
age and in the absence of signs of end-organ damage.[109] GHTN causes cardiovascular insufficiency and, if left untreated, is often a precursor
to the development of preeclampsia (PRE-E). PRE-E is a gestational cardiovascular
disease defined as persistent severe hypertension with signs of end-organ damage following
20 weeks gestational age.[110]
[111]
[112]
[113] PRE-E is a severe life-threatening condition that increases risk for secondary health
complications including placental abruption, stroke, and seizures (eclampsia).[114]
Recent studies have explored associations between trauma and PTSD and GHTN and PRE-E
([Table 3]). PTSD is associated with both GHTN and PRE-E, while trauma is not associated with
HDP. More specifically, experiencing four or more traumatic experiences during childhood
(e.g., abuse, parental separation, witnessing abuse, living with a substance abuser,
household member imprisonment) was not associated with the development of GHTN or
PRE-E in a cohort of Latinx pregnant women.[115] However, a PTSD diagnosis is associated with an increased risk of both GHTN and
PRE-E in a large, racially diverse sample of pregnant veterans.[88] Similarly, a diagnosis of PTSD stemming from experiencing inter-partner violence
is associated with the development of GHTN and PRE-E in a majority black study sample.[88]
[116]
Table 3
Relationships between trauma, PTSD, chronic stress, and GHTN or PRE-E
GHTN and PRE-E
|
|
Reference
|
Stress/trauma subtype
|
Association with GHTN
|
Association with PRE-E
|
Sample size (N)
|
Racial-ethnic demographics
|
Income
|
Education
|
Trauma
|
Shaw et al, 2017
|
Traumatic exposure in war veterans
|
|
↑
|
14,047
|
W, NH: 10,262
B, NH: 3,673
O: 519
|
Not reported
|
Not reported
|
Stanhope et al, 2020
|
Adverse childhood experiences
|
—
|
|
2,319
|
H: 100%
|
Not reported
|
<HS: 31.6%
HS: 22.3%
>HS: 36.4%
|
PTSD
|
Gilliam et al, 2022
|
Inter-partner violence (IPV) and PTSD symptoms during pregnancy
|
↑
|
|
137
|
B, NH: 69.9%
W, NH: 18.4
MR: 8.1%
H: 7.4%
O: 0.7%
|
Majority low income
|
Not reported
|
Shaw et al, 2017
|
PTSD and associated symptoms
|
|
↑
|
14,047
|
W, NH: 10,262
B, NH: 3,673
O: 519
|
Not reported
|
Not reported
|
Chronic stress
|
Leeners et al, 2007
|
Emotional stress
|
↑
|
|
1,605
|
W: 100%
|
Not reported
|
< Elementary school: 0.62%, Extended elementary school: 12.6%
HS: 36.9.
>HS: 49.9
|
Vollebregt et al, 2008
|
Psychosocial stress
|
—
|
—
|
12,377
|
W, NH: 2,461
B, NH: 157
Turkish/Moroccan: 347
O: 712
|
Not reported
|
0–5: 557,
6–10: 1,445,
>10: 1,651
Reported in years of education
|
Klonoff-Cohen et al, 1996
|
Job stress
|
|
↑
|
218
|
W, NH: 58%
B, NH: 42%
|
Not reported
|
12: 40.8%
12 + : 65.6%
Reported in years of education
|
Schneider et al, 2011
|
Psychosocial Stress
|
|
↑
|
647,392
|
Not reported
|
Not reported
|
Not reported
|
Marcoux et al, 1999
|
Job stress during first 20 weeks of pregnancy
|
↑
|
↑
|
730
|
Not reported
|
Not reported
|
Less than or equal to 12: 50%
13–14: 18.9%
Greater than or equal to 15: 31.1%
Reported in years of education
|
Caplan et al, 2021
|
Lifetime stress
|
↑
|
↑
|
744
|
W, NH: 59.1%
B, NH:16.3%
H: 18.7%
|
Not reported
|
<HS: 26%
C + : 39.5%
|
Abbreviations: GHTN, gestational hypertension; PRE-E, precursor to the development
of preeclampsia; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder.
Note: Race and ethnicity: W,NH: white non-Hispanic; B, NH: black non-Hispanic; H:
Hispanic; A: Asian; I: indigenous; O: other; MR: multiracial; NW: non-white.
Education: <HS: less than high school; HS: high school; SC: some college; SC + : some
college or more; C: college; G: graduate school; T: training program/certification.
↑: positive association found; —: no association found.
While literature assessing the role of trauma or PTSD in the development of GHTN and
PRE-E is limited, other studies have established a relationship between nontraumatic
chronic stressors and GHTN or PRE-E. Lifetime stress, for example, increased the risk
of developing GHTN or PRE-E in a majority white multi-site sample of pregnant women.[117] In parallel, lifetime chronic stress secondary to racial discrimination in a sample
of black pregnant women was associated with GHTN.[101] Experiencing lifetime stressors (e.g., financial, emotional, relationship stress)
was associated with an increased prevalence of HDP.[118] Furthermore, having an occupation with high mental stress was associated with an
increased risk of developing PRE-E in a sample of Canadian women,[119] and job-related stress during pregnancy increased the risk for PRE-E in a black
and white sample.[120] Social burden, defined as low social status and high psychosocial stress, was associated
with PRE-E development in a cohort of pregnant German women.[121] Moreover, experiencing emotional stressors (including social, psychological, financial,
family, and medical stressors) during pregnancy was associated with a 1.6-fold increased
risk for developing a hypertensive disease in pregnancy in a white study cohort.[122] Conversely, a study conducted in the Netherlands in a primarily white sample determined
that psychological stress (including work stress, depression, anxiety, and pregnancy-related
anxiety) in the first trimester had no significant influence on the incidence of PRE-E
in nulliparous women.[123]
Conclusions and Future Directions
Conclusions and Future Directions
In summary, the limited existing literature supports the premise that trauma and PTSD
may be important factors that impact metabolic function within the context of pregnancy,
as trauma exposure and PTSD are associated with increased risk of gestational metabolic
dysfunction ([Tables 1]
[2]
[3]). However, further work is needed to characterize the specific biological mechanisms
that underlie how trauma and PTSD can contribute to the development of metabolic disorders
of pregnancy. Specifically, no known studies have investigated associations between
gestational metabolic disorders and biological markers of chronic stress or trauma
(e.g., cortisol, HRV) or physiological measures of PTSD severity (e.g., hyperarousal),
despite evidence of a relationship between such biological markers and metabolic disorders
in nonpregnant persons ([Fig. 1]).[124]
[125]
Importantly, many of the existing studies failed to consider key confounders in the
relationship between trauma or PTSD and gestational metabolic disease in pregnancy.
For instance, despite genetic predisposition being one of the biggest risk factors
for gestational metabolic disease,[126]
[127] several of the included studies did not consider family history as a confounding
variable.[4]
[77]
[88]
[101]
[102]
[104]
[116] Moreover, not all studies controlled for preexisting metabolic disease[88]
[105]
[106] and previous gestational metabolic disease.[102]
[105]
[106]
[116] Specific to GDM, diet and having a sedentary lifestyle,[128]
[129] are some of the biggest risk factors of GDM; however, only one of the three included
studies controlled for these factors in their analyses.[90] For FGR and LBW, food insufficiency, which causes undernutrition,[130] and substance abuse, which limits uterine and placental blood flow necessary for
fetal growth,[131] were each controlled for in only two out of the six included studies.[103]
[105]
[106] Finally, few of the existing studies considered how behavioral changes following
trauma or onset of PTSD, including changes in sleep, physical activity, and eating
behaviors, impact metabolism during pregnancy.[128]
[129]
The equivocal nature of some studies assessing risk for HDP due to PTSD may be due
to inconsistent measures of PTSD used across studies. Studies to date have used the
Mini International Neuropsychiatric interview[105] and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist,[106] which are self-report measures, and the International Classification of Disease,
Ninth Revision (ICD-9),[88] a clinician-administered diagnosis of PTSD. Self-report measures have been found
to result in higher severity scores as compared with scores from clinician-administered
measures. Additionally, the cutoff score for PTSD diagnosis using the same self-report
measure is inconsistent across study groups.[132] Conversely, clinician-administered PTSD measures like the ICD-9 require access to
mental health care. This is an important caveat to consider, as previous studies have
found that socioeconomically disadvantaged and minoritized women are underdiagnosed
for PTSD.[133] The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) is a psychometrically valid
and standardized alternative to measures used in studies to date that has shown excellent
reliability for over 20 years.[134] Future studies would benefit from using the most rigorous instruments to quantify
PTSD symptoms, traumatic events, and chronic stressors like racial discrimination.
In the current review, we included various trauma types when assessing the relationship
between trauma and gestational metabolic disease. However, different trauma types
may have distinct impacts on the ANS and HPA-axis as well as on metabolism in and
outside the context of pregnancy. For instance, childhood maltreatment, has been consistently
shown to have deleterious effects on cardiometabolic health in nonpregnant people.[135]
[136]
[137] Childhood sexual abuse, in particular, has been associated with metabolic risk factors
including low HRV and higher body mass index,[138] highlighting the need for future studies to consider how different types of trauma
impact gestational metabolic function and risk for HPD.
Another important limitation of existing studies assessing the relationships between
trauma, PTSD, and metabolic disorders in pregnancy is the lack of representation of
racial-ethnic minorities (see all tables). Given the disproportionate impact of gestational
metabolic disorders on people of color, in particular black pregnant persons,[8] studies that aim to identify risk factors for gestational metabolic dysfunction
would benefit greatly from having representative study samples. As a result of interpersonal,
systemic, and institutional racism, non-white persons, especially black persons, are
exposed to greater levels of chronic stress, traumatic experiences, and are more likely
to be diagnosed with PTSD, suggesting that these exposures may be risk factors for
gestational metabolic disease.[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[139] Due to maternal health inequities, there is a critical need to understand the biological
mechanisms underlying the relationship between chronic stress, trauma, PTSD, and gestational
metabolic disease. This research could aid with early identification of pregnant individuals
at high risk for gestational metabolic disease, allowing for preventive and early
treatment to improve maternal health inequities and associated disease in their offspring.