Endoscopy 2024; 56(11): 888-889
DOI: 10.1055/a-2349-0702
Letter to the editor

Reply to Wang et al.

1   Department of Medical Gastroenterology, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
,
Rupjyoti Talukdar
1   Department of Medical Gastroenterology, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
,
D. Nageshwar Reddy
1   Department of Medical Gastroenterology, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
› Author Affiliations
Preview

We appreciate the insights from Wang et al. [11]. We acknowledge the importance of stone size in determining the need for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). All patients included in our study had stone sizes greater than 5 mm, adhering to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines and similarly to our previously published work [22] [33]. We agree with the comment regarding the ESGE suggestion to restrict the use of endoscopic therapy after ESWL to patients with no spontaneous clearance of pancreatic stones after adequate fragmentation by ESWL. However, this recommendation is a weak recommendation [44]. In India, patients with chronic pancreatitis typically have large pancreatic stones, which are dense and spiculated. The practice of endoscopic therapy combined with ESWL is in alignment with published literature [33] [55].

Finally, we did not include the morphology of main pancreatic duct (MPD) stricture as a predictor of persistent pain in the current study; instead, we analyzed presence and absence of MPD stricture at the index procedure. We agree that the morphology of MPD stricture may influence pain. Out of 93 patients with MPD stricture, 14 patients had refractory MPD stricture in the current study.



Publication History

Article published online:
30 October 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany