Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2460-4900
Impact of Insurance Status on Postoperative Recovery after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

Abstract
Background
Persistent disparities in breast reconstruction access have been widely documented, yet a significant research gap remains in understanding the impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on postoperative outcomes and complications.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent abdominal-based free-flap breast reconstruction between August 2018 and December 2022 at a racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse urban academic institute with a historically underserved patient population. Patients were stratified by the public (Medicare and Medicaid) versus private insurance as a proxy for SDOH. Patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), timing in progression through postoperative recovery milestones, and complications were compared.
Results
A total of 162 patients were included, and 57% of patients had public insurance, with this group more likely to be Hispanic (odds ratio [OR] 2.7; p = 0.003) and Spanish-speaking (OR 3.4; p = 0.003). Privately insured patients were more likely to be non-Hispanic Black (OR 2.7; p = 0.006). Patients with public insurance had a higher rate of unplanned return to the operating room within 90 days and a higher incidence of complications, though not statistically significant. They also experienced a significantly longer LOS than privately insured patients (3.6 ± 1.0 vs. 3.0 ± 0.7 days; p < 0.0001). Logistic regression identified an LOS exceeding 3 days as independently associated with public insurance status (OR 3.0; p = 0.03), bilateral procedure (OR 5.6; p = 0.0007), preoperative functional-dependent status (OR 7.0; p = 0.04), and higher body mass index (BMI; OR 1.1; p = 0.03). Patients with public insurance were more likely to encounter delays in achieving recovery milestones.
Conclusion
Public insurance status, serving as a proxy for a disadvantage in SDOH, is predictive of extended LOS and postoperative recovery delays following microsurgical breast reconstruction. This underscores the need for future quality improvement efforts to address and mitigate these disparities.
Note
This work has not been previously presented or published.
Authors' Contributions
All the authors were responsible for conceptualization; design; data collection, analysis, and interpretation; drafting, revision, and manuscript approval.
Publication History
Received: 10 July 2024
Accepted: 16 October 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
04 November 2024
Article published online:
25 November 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breast Cancer Statistics. 2023 . Accessed November 11, 2024 at: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/statistics/index.htm
- 2 Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC. et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (05) 1014-1025 , discussion 1026–1027
- 3 Atisha D, Alderman AK, Lowery JC, Kuhn LE, Davis J, Wilkins EG. Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. Ann Surg 2008; 247 (06) 1019-1028
- 4 Eltahir Y, Werners LLCH, Dreise MM. et al. Quality-of-life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (02) 201e-209e
- 5 The Center for Consumer Information & Insurance. Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act (WHCRA). 2013 . Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Accessed May 12, 2024 at: https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Programs-and-Initiatives/Other-Insurance-Protections/whcra_factsheet.html
- 6 Doren EL, Park K, Olson J. Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction following implementation of the affordable care act: a systematic review using a minority health and disparities research framework. Am J Surg 2023; 226 (01) 37-47
- 7 Butler PD, Familusi O, Serletti JM, Fox JP. Influence of race, insurance status, and geographic access to plastic surgeons on immediate breast reconstruction rates. Am J Surg 2018; 215 (06) 987-994
- 8 Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep 2014; 129 (Suppl. 02) 19-31
- 9 Gerald MJ, Strand N, Dugue D, Asanbe OA, Jones CM. Beginning to find the missing piece: social determinants of health as a contributor to disparities in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (04) 724e-725e
- 10 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2030. Accessed November 11, 2024 at: https://health.gov/healthypeople
- 11 Panchal H, Shamsunder MG, Sheinin A. et al. Impact of physician payments on microvascular breast reconstruction: an all-payer claim database analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 333-339
- 12 Dinis J, Junn A, Chouairi F. et al. Impact of insurance payer and socioeconomic status on type of autologous breast reconstruction. Surg Oncol 2021; 39: 101661
- 13 Huynh KA, Jayaram M, Wang C. et al. Factors associated with state-specific medicaid expansion and receipt of autologous breast reconstruction among patients undergoing mastectomy. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (08) e2119141
- 14 Meade AE, Cummins SM, Farewell JT. et al. Breaking barriers to breast reconstruction among socioeconomically disadvantaged patients at a large safety-net hospital. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (07) e4410
- 15 Siotos C, Azizi A, Assam L. et al. Breast reconstruction for medicaid beneficiaries: a systematic review of the current evidence. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2020; 54 (02) 77-82
- 16 Vieira BL, Lanier ST, Mlodinow AS. et al. A multi-institutional analysis of insurance status as a predictor of morbidity following breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014; 2 (11) e255
- 17 Friedman-Eldar O, Burke J, de Castro Silva I. et al. Stalled at the intersection: insurance status and disparities in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 194 (02) 327-335
- 18 Shippee TP, Kozhimannil KB, Rowan K, Virnig BA. Health insurance coverage and racial disparities in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Womens Health Issues 2014; 24 (03) e261-e269
- 19 Yang RL, Newman AS, Lin IC. et al. Trends in immediate breast reconstruction across insurance groups after enactment of breast cancer legislation. Cancer 2013; 119 (13) 2462-2468
- 20 Marquez J, Makadia A, Zlatopolsky A, Hou W, Hajagos J, Khan S. Abstract 184: The effect of insurance payer type on outcomes and readmission rates in patients undergoing breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (4S): 124-125
- 21 Plotsker EL, Graziano FD, Kim M. et al. Social determinants of health and patient-reported outcomes following autologous breast reconstruction, using insurance as a proxy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; (e-pub ahead of print).
- 22 Le NK, Gabrick KS, Chouairi F, Mets EJ, Avraham T, Alperovich M. Impact of socioeconomic status on psychological functioning in survivorship following breast cancer and reconstruction. Breast J 2020; 26 (09) 1695-1701
- 23 Oskar S, Nelson JA, Hicks MEV. et al. The impact of race on perioperative and patient-reported outcomes following autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (01) 15-27
- 24 Snyder RA, Chang GJ. Insurance status as a surrogate for social determinants of health in cancer clinical trials. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (04) e203890
- 25 Wang F, Rothchild E, Lu YH, Ricci JA. Language disparity predicts poor patient-reported outcome and follow-up in microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (09) 681-694
- 26 Fei W, Jinesh S, Nicolas G, Joseph Y, Jason N, Ricci JA. Limited English proficiency is not associated with poor postoperative outcomes or follow-up rates in patients undergoing breast reduction mammoplasty - a single institution retrospective cohort study. J Surg Res 2024; 296: 689-695
- 27 Bamba R, Wiebe JE, Ingersol CA. et al. Do patient expectations of discharge affect length of stay after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (01) 34-40
- 28 Kaoutzanis C, Ganesh Kumar N, O'Neill D. et al. Enhanced recovery pathway in microvascular autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction: should it become the standard of care?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (04) 841-851
- 29 Lu YH, Jeon J, Mahajan L, Yan Y, Weichman KE, Ricci JA. Postoperative magnesium sulfate repletion decreases narcotic use in abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (07) 559-565
- 30 Brodersen F, Wagner J, Uzunoglu FG, Petersen-Ewert C. Impact of preoperative patient education on postoperative recovery in abdominal surgery: a systematic review. World J Surg 2023; 47 (04) 937-947
- 31 Cavallaro PM, Milch H, Savitt L. et al. Addition of a scripted pre-operative patient education module to an existing ERAS pathway further reduces length of stay. Am J Surg 2018; 216 (04) 652-657
- 32 Leeds IL, Alimi Y, Hobson DR. et al. Racial and socioeconomic differences manifest in process measure adherence for enhanced recovery after surgery pathway. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60 (10) 1092-1101
- 33 Kaplan SA, Calman NS, Golub M, Davis JH, Ruddock C, Billings J. Racial and ethnic disparities in health: a view from the South Bronx. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2006; 17 (01) 116-127