Endoscopy 2025; 57(06): 593-601
DOI: 10.1055/a-2517-0927
Original article

Safety and effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage in patients with cirrhosis: an international multicenter experience

1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
,
Todd H. Baron
2   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States
,
Judy A. Trieu
2   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States
,
3   Endoscopy Unit, ISABIAL, Hospital General University Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain
,
3   Endoscopy Unit, ISABIAL, Hospital General University Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain
,
Karl Akiki
4   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
,
4   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
,
Prabhat Kumar
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
,
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
,
C. Roberto Simons-Linares
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
,
Prabhleen Chahal
5   Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, United States
› Author Affiliations


Abstract

Background

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) for symptomatic gallbladder disease has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with high surgical risk, but data are lacking for patients with cirrhosis. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of EUS-GBD in patients with and without cirrhosis.

Methods

This retrospective review included patients who underwent EUS-GBD at four (three US and one Spanish) international tertiary care centers. Outcomes, including technical success, clinical success, and procedure-related adverse events, were compared between patients with and without cirrhosis.

Results

170 patients (47 with cirrhosis, 123 without cirrhosis) were included. There was no difference in age, sex, race, comorbidities, antiplatelet use, hemoglobin, or international normalized ratio between the two groups (P > 0.05 for all). The most common etiology of cirrhosis was alcohol (42.6%) with mean Model of End-stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) score of 16.2 (SD 8.8). Acute cholecystitis was more common in patients with cirrhosis (74.5% vs. 56.9%; P = 0.02). Technical (cirrhosis 97.9% vs. no cirrhosis 95.1%; P = 0.67) and clinical (93.6% vs. 94.9%; P = 0.71) success rates were similar in the two groups. Adverse events were infrequent and similar between groups, the most common being stent maldeployment (cirrhosis 4.3% vs. no cirrhosis 5.7%; P = 0.99). Survival rates were similar at the end of follow-up.

Conclusion

EUS-GBD was safe and effective in patients with cirrhosis, with outcomes similar to patients without cirrhosis when performed by experienced echoendoscopists. Patients with cirrhosis and symptomatic gallbladder disease can be considered for EUS-GBD.



Publication History

Received: 24 January 2024

Accepted after revision: 14 January 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
15 January 2025

Article published online:
24 February 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Stinton LM, Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver 2012; 6: 172-187
  • 2 McCarty TR, Hathorn KE, Bazarbashi AN. et al. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for symptomatic gallbladder disease: a cumulative systematic review meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 4964-4985
  • 3 Khan MA, Atiq O, Kubiliun N. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: is it better than percutaneous gallbladder drainage?. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 76-87 e73
  • 4 McKay A, Abulfaraj M, Lipschitz J. Short- and long-term outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 1343-1351
  • 5 James TW, Krafft M, Croglio M. et al. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in patients with cirrhosis: results of a multicenter retrospective study. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E1099-E1104
  • 6 Siddiqui A, Kunda R, Tyberg A. et al. Three-way comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents versus endoscopic transpapillary drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: clinical outcomes and success in an international, multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 1260-1270
  • 7 van der Merwe SW, van Wanrooij RLJ, Bronswijk M. et al. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 185-205
  • 8 Irani SS, Sharzehi K, Siddiqui UD. AGA clinical practice update on role of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: commentary. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 1141-1147
  • 9 Nass KJ, Zwager LW, van der Vlugt M. et al. Novel classification for adverse events in GI endoscopy: the AGREE classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 1078-1085 e1078
  • 10 Luo X, Sharaiha R, Teoh AYB. Endoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32: 527-543
  • 11 Inoue T, Yoshida M, Suzuki Y. et al. Comparison of the long-term outcomes of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage and endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for calculous cholecystitis in poor surgical candidates: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98: 362-370
  • 12 Irani SS, Sharma NR, Storm AC. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis: a prospective multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2023; 278: e556-e562
  • 13 Walter D, Teoh AY, Itoi T. et al. EUS-guided gall bladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent: a prospective long-term evaluation. Gut 2016; 65: 6-8
  • 14 Saumoy M, Novikov A, Kahaleh M. Long-term outcomes after EUS-guided gallbladder drainage. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 97-101
  • 15 Teoh AY, Perez-Miranda M, Kunda R. et al. Outcomes of an international multicenter registry on EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in patients at high risk for cholecystectomy. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E964-E973
  • 16 Perez-Miranda M. Technical considerations in EUS-guided gallbladder drainage. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 79-82
  • 17 Teoh AYB, Leung CH, Tam PTH. et al. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a propensity score analysis with 1-year follow-up data. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 577-583
  • 18 Boregowda U, Umapathy C, Nanjappa A. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided gallbladder drainage – is it ready for prime time?. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2018; 9: 47-54
  • 19 Saumoy M, Tyberg A, Brown E. et al. Successful cholecystectomy after endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage compared with percutaneous cholecystostomy, can it be done?. J Clin Gastroenterol 2019; 53: 231-235
  • 20 Martinez-Moreno B, Lopez-Roldan G, Martinez-Sempere J. et al. Long-term results after EUS gallbladder drainage in high-surgical-risk patients with acute cholecystitis: a 3-year follow-up registry. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11: E1063-E1068
  • 21 Choi JH, Lee SS, Choi JH. et al. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 656-661