Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2760-5850
Efficacy of 2 mg vs. High-Dose 8 mg Aflibercept in Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration
Wirksamkeit von 2 mg gegenüber hochdosiertem 8 mg Aflibercept bei neovaskulärer altersbedingter MakuladegenerationAuthors
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the efficacy of switching treatment from 2 mg aflibercept to high-dose 8 mg aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
Methods The database was screened for eyes with nAMD switched from 2 mg to 8 mg aflibercept. Demographic data, multimodal imaging, treatment parameters and outcomes were recorded. Efficacy of 2 mg vs. 8 mg aflibercept was compared four injections prior to, and four injections after switching by analysing central subfield thickness (CST), subretinal fluid (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF) as well as visual acuity (VA).
Results Sixteen consecutive eyes of 16 patients (mean age 78.5 ± 5.5 years) were identified. There were 13 women (81.3%) and 3 men (18.7%). Prior to switching, mean anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment duration for nAMD was 8.1 ± 2.1 years and pretreatment amounted to a mean of 27.8 ± 23.6 injections. Mean injection intervals were similar prior to and after switching (5.05 vs. 5.13 weeks; p = 0.76). CST remained stable before and after switching (p = 0.25). After switching, the percentage of eyes with a dry macula increased from 0% to 37.5% (p = 0.02) and the percentage of eyes with SRF decreased from 93.8% to 56.3% (p = 0.037). There was a trend, but no significant effect towards a reduction of IRF (18.8% to 6.3%, p = 0.60). Visual acuity remained stable irrespective of treatment (p = 0.78).
Conclusions Concerning CST on OCT, no clear advantage of high-dose 8 mg aflibercept over conventional 2 mg aflibercept was seen in this study. However, with high-dose 8 mg aflibercept the number of eyes with a dry macula increased, and the amount of eyes with SRF decreased significantly. In pretreated eyes, the analysis of macular fluid compartments (as compared to CST) might be more sensitive for comparing treatment effects between 2 mg and 8 mg aflibercept.
Zusammenfassung
Zielsetzung Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit eines Therapiewechsels von 2 mg Aflibercept auf hochdosierte 8 mg Aflibercept bei neovaskulärer altersbedingter Makuladegeneration (nAMD).
Methoden Die Datenbank wurde auf Augen mit nAMD durchsucht, bei denen von 2 mg auf 8 mg Aflibercept umgestellt wurde. Es wurden demografische Daten, multimodale Bildgebung, Behandlungsparameter und Therapieergebnisse erfasst. Die Wirksamkeit von 2 mg vs. 8 mg Aflibercept wurde jeweils über 4 Injektionen vor und nach dem Wechsel verglichen, wobei die zentrale Netzhautdicke (CST), subretinale Flüssigkeit (SRF), intraretinale Flüssigkeit (IRF) sowie die Sehschärfe (VA) analysiert wurden.
Ergebnisse Es wurden 16 konsekutive Augen von 16 Patienten (Durchschnittsalter 78,5 ± 5,5 Jahre) identifiziert, darunter 13 Frauen (81,3%) und 3 Männer (18,7%). Vor dem Wechsel betrug die mittlere Behandlungsdauer mit antivaskulären endothelialen Wachstumsfaktor-Injektionen (VEGF-Injektionen) 8,1 ± 2,1 Jahre bei durchschnittlich 27,8 ± 23,6 vorherigen Injektionen. Die mittleren Injektionsintervalle waren vor und nach dem Wechsel vergleichbar (5,05 vs. 5,13 Wochen; p = 0,76). Die CST blieb vor und nach dem Wechsel stabil (p = 0,25). Nach dem Wechsel stieg der Anteil an Augen mit trockener Makula von 0% auf 37,5% (p = 0,02) und der Anteil an Augen mit SRF sank signifikant von 93,8% auf 56,3% (p = 0,037). Es zeigte sich ein Trend zu einer Reduktion von IRF (18,8% auf 6,3%), der jedoch nicht signifikant war (p = 0,60). Die Sehschärfe blieb unabhängig von der Behandlung stabil (p = 0,78).
Schlussfolgerung Bezüglich der CST in der OCT zeigte sich in dieser Studie kein eindeutiger Vorteil von hochdosiertem 8 mg Aflibercept gegenüber der konventionellen 2 mg-Dosierung. Mit 8 mg Aflibercept konnte jedoch der Anteil an Augen mit trockener Makula signifikant gesteigert und der Anteil an Augen mit SRF signifikant reduziert werden. Bei vorbehandelten Augen könnte die Analyse der Flüssigkeitskompartimente in der Makula (im Vergleich zur CST) sensitiver für den Vergleich von Behandlungseffekten zwischen 2 mg und 8 mg Aflibercept sein.
Already known:
-
High-dose aflibercept (8 mg) has been shown in randomized clinical trials to be safe and potentially more durable compared to the standard 2 mg formulation.
-
Quantitative OCT parameters such as CST are widely used to assess treatment efficacy, but may not always capture subtle changes in macular fluid compartments.
-
It remained unclear whether switching pretreated and therapy-resistant nAMD eyes from aflibercept 2 mg to 8 mg would improve fluid control in a real-world setting.
Newly described:
-
In this real-world cohort, switching from aflibercept 2 mg to 8 mg significantly increased the proportion of eyes achieving a dry macula.
-
Subretinal fluid decreased markedly after the switch, while CST values remained stable without significant change.
-
The study highlights that qualitative OCT fluid analysis may be more sensitive than CST for detecting treatment effects of high-dose aflibercept in heavily pretreated nAMD eyes.
Schlüsselwörter
Retina - Aflibercept - altersbedingte Makuladegeneration - intravitreale InjektionenPublication History
Received: 01 August 2025
Accepted: 24 November 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
15 December 2025
Article published online:
18 February 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Wong WL, Su X, Li X. et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014; 2: e106-e116
- 2 Klein R, Chou CF, Klein BE. et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the US population. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129: 75-80
- 3 Lim LS, Mitchell P, Seddon JM. et al. Age-related macular degeneration. Lancet 2012; 379: 1728-1738
- 4 Bressler NM. Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness. JAMA 2004; 291: 1900-1901
- 5 Ferrara N, Adamis AP. Ten years of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2016; 15: 385-403
- 6 Bhutto I, Lutty G. Understanding age-related macular degeneration (AMD): relationships between the photoreceptor/retinal pigment epithelium/Bruchʼs membrane/choriocapillaris complex. Mol Aspects Med 2012; 33: 295-317
- 7 Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature 2005; 438: 932-936
- 8 Ferrara N, Kerbel RS. Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target. Nature 2005; 438: 967-974
- 9 Campochiaro PA. Ocular neovascularization. J Mol Med (Berl) 2013; 91: 311-321
- 10 Kvanta A. Ocular angiogenesis: the role of growth factors. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006; 84: 282-288
- 11 Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS. et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1419-1431
- 12 Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M. et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1432-1444
- 13 Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V. et al. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 2537-2548
- 14 Schmidt-Erfurth U, Kaiser PK, Korobelnik JF. et al. Intravitreal aflibercept injection for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: ninety-six-week results of the VIEW studies. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 193-201
- 15 Jaffe GJ, Martin DF, Toth CA. et al. Macular morphology and visual acuity in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 1860-1870
- 16 Amoaku WM, Chakravarthy U, Gale R. et al. Defining response to anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular AMD. Eye (Lond) 2015; 29: 1397-1398
- 17 Mettu PS, Allingham MJ, Cousins SW. Incomplete response to Anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular AMD: Exploring disease mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Prog Retin Eye Res 2021; 82: 100906
- 18 Ricci F, Bandello F, Navarra P. et al. Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Therapeutic Management and New-Upcoming Approaches. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21
- 19 Gillies MC, Campain A, Barthelmes D. et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Data from an Observational Study. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 1837-1845
- 20 Holz FG, Tadayoni R, Beatty S. et al. Multi-country real-life experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 2015; 99: 220-226
- 21 Bloch SB, Larsen M, Munch IC. Incidence of Legal Blindness from Age-related Macular Degeneration in Denmark: Year 2000 to 2010. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 153: 209-213.e2
- 22 Papadopoulos N, Martin J, Ruan Q. et al. Binding and neutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and related ligands by VEGF Trap, ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Angiogenesis 2012; 15: 171-185
- 23 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. EYLEA® (aflibercept). Highlights of prescribing information. 2023. Accessed 14.01.2026 at: https://www.regeneron.com/downloads/eylea_fpi.pdf
- 24 Heier JS, Khanani AM, Quezada Ruiz C. et al. Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab up to every 16 weeks for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (TENAYA and LUCERNE): two randomised, double-masked, phase 3, non-inferiority trials. Lancet 2022; 399: 729-740
- 25 Bayer AG. New Eylea™ 8 mg approved in EU. News release. Published January 08, 2024. Accessed 13.05.2024 at: https://www.bayer.com/media/en-us/new-eylea-8-mg-approved-in-eu/%23
- 26 Fauser S, Schwabecker V, Muether PS. Suppression of intraocular vascular endothelial growth factor during aflibercept treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 158: 532-536
- 27 Stewart MW. Extended Duration Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibition in the Eye: Failures, Successes, and Future Possibilities. Pharmaceutics 2018; 10: 21
- 28 Wykoff CC, Brown DM, Reed K. et al. Effect of High-Dose Intravitreal Aflibercept, 8 mg, in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Phase 2 CANDELA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2023; 141: 834-842
- 29 Lanzetta P, Korobelnik JF, Heier JS. et al. Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (PULSAR): 48-week results from a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2024; 403: 1141-1152
- 30 You QS, Gaber R, Meshi A. et al. High-dose high-frequency aflibercept for recalcitrant neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2018; 38: 1156-1165
- 31 Schworm B, Luft N, Keidel LF. et al. Ranibizumab non-response in pachychoroid neovasculopathy: Effects of switching to aflibercept. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 8439
- 32 Busbee BG, Ho AC, Brown DM. et al. Twelve-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 1046-1056
- 33 Chaudhary V, Matonti F, Zarranz-Ventura J. et al. Impact of fluid compartments on functional outcomes for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A Systematic Literature Review. Retina 2022; 42: 589-606
- 34 Brown DM, Chen E, Mariani A. et al. Super-dose anti-VEGF (SAVE) trial: 2.0 mg intravitreal ranibizumab for recalcitrant neovascular macular degeneration-primary end point. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 349-354
- 35 Bontzos G, Bagheri S, Ioanidi L. et al. Nonresponders to Ranibizumab Anti-VEGF Treatment Are Actually Short-term Responders: A Prospective Spectral-Domain OCT Study. Ophthalmol Retina 2020; 4: 1138-1145
- 36 Funk M, Karl D, Georgopoulos M. et al. Neovascular age-related macular degeneration: intraocular cytokines and growth factors and the influence of therapy with ranibizumab. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 2393-2399
- 37 García-Quintanilla L, Luaces-Rodríguez A, Gil-Martínez M. et al. Pharmacokinetics of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Drugs in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Pharmaceutics 2019; 11
- 38 Coscas GJ, Lupidi M, Coscas F. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography versus traditional multimodal imaging in assessing the activity of exudative age-related macular degeneration: A New Diagnostic Challenge. Retina 2015; 35: 2219-2228
