Download PDF
Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2781-7471
SMFM Fellowship Series Article

The Impact of Offspring Sex on Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Individuals with Pregestational Diabetes

Authors

  • Arlin Delgado

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

  • Kaitlyn E. James

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

  • Sarah Hsu

    2   Diabetes Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

  • Andrea G. Edlow

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    3   Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

  • Camille E. Powe

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    2   Diabetes Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    4   Diabetes Unit, Endocrinology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    5   Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    6   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

  • Lydia L. Shook 

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    3   Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Funding Information This study was supported by the National Institute of Health/National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (to L.L.S.). Funding supporters had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective

Pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) is increasing in prevalence among pregnant individuals and is associated with adverse outcomes. Prior work suggests that offspring sex influences placental responses and may impact risk for adverse outcomes. We sought to assess the impact of offspring sex on adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in individuals with PGDM.

Study Design

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 503 pregnant individuals with PGDM and known offspring sex with care at a major urban academic center between 1998 and 2016. We assessed two co-primary composite outcomes: (1) a composite adverse pregnancy outcome of small for gestational age (SGA), hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP), and stillbirth and (2) a composite adverse neonatal outcome of large for gestational age (LGA), hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, shoulder dystocia, and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Secondary outcomes of spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were assessed. Mixed effects logistic regression models, accounting for multiple pregnancies and adjusting for first trimester body mass index (BMI), insurance, parity, and maternal race/ethnicity, were analyzed.

Results

Of the 503 pregnant individuals with PGDM, 67% had a diagnosis of type 2 DM and 33% had type 1 DM. The composite adverse pregnancy outcome occurred in 79 of 258 (31%) pregnancies with a female fetus and 76 of 245 (31%) pregnancies with a male fetus. The composite neonatal outcome occurred in 163 of 245 males (67%) and 154 of 258 females (60%). Male infants had significantly higher odds of requiring admission to the NICU (adjusted odds ratio 1.79 [95% confidence interval: 1.13, 2.80], p = 0.01). There were no observed sex differences in the incidence of spontaneous PTB.

Conclusion

We identified high rates of both composite outcomes in pregnancies with PGDM, regardless of fetal sex. The significantly higher rate of NICU admission among males suggests an increased risk of neonatal morbidity in males exposed to PGDM.

Key Points

  • A high incidence of adverse outcomes was observed in PGDM pregnancies.

  • Male neonates are at greater risk of NICU admission.

  • In individuals with type 2 DM, a trend toward increased risk of LGA was observed in male neonates.

Keywords

offspring sex - pregestational diabetes - adverse pregnancy outcomes - neonatal morbidity

Contributors' Statement

A.D.: conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; K.J.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, validation, writing—review and editing; S.H.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, validation, writing—review and editing; A.E.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing; C.P.: conceptualization, data curation, methodology, writing—review and editing; L.S.: conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 02 July 2025

Accepted: 02 January 2026

Accepted Manuscript online:
07 January 2026

Article published online:
16 January 2026

© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Gregory ECW, Ely DM. Trends and characteristics in prepregnancy diabetes: United States, 2016-2021. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2023; 72 (06) 1-13
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Chivese T, Hoegfeldt CA, Werfalli M. et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: the prevalence of pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published during 2010-2020. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022; 183: 109049
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Deputy NP, Kim SY, Conrey EJ, Bullard KM. Prevalence and changes in preexisting diabetes and gestational diabetes among women who had a live birth—United States, 2012-2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018; 67 (43) 1201-1207
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 11th ed. International Diabetes Federation; 2025
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Reitzle L, Heidemann C, Baumert J. et al. Pregnancy complications in women with pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2023; 120 (06) 81-86
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Schalekamp-Timmermans S, Arends LR, Alsaker E. et al; Global Pregnancy Collaboration. Fetal sex-specific differences in gestational age at delivery in pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46 (02) 632-642
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Volpe G, Ioannou C, Cavallaro A, Vannuccini S, Ruiz-Martinez S, Impey L. The influence of fetal sex on the antenatal diagnosis of small for gestational age. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 32 (11) 1832-1837
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Hershkovitz R, Leron E, Mazor M. Gender does matter in perinatal medicine. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004; 19 (04) 366-369
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Peelen MJCS, Kazemier BM, Ravelli ACJ. et al. Impact of fetal gender on the risk of preterm birth, a national cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016; 95 (09) 1034-1041
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Voskamp BJ, Peelen MJCS, Ravelli ACJ. et al. Association between fetal sex, birthweight percentile and adverse pregnancy outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99 (01) 48-58
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Fang K, Yue S, Wang S. et al. The association between sex and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. BMC Pediatr 2024; 24 (01) 129
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 García-Patterson A, Aulinas A, Sojo L. et al. Poorer perinatal outcome in male newborns of women with pregestational diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 2011; 28 (04) 436-439
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Bracero LA, Cassidy S, Byrne DW. Effect of gender on perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by diabetes. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996; 41 (01) 10-14
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Evers IM, de Valk HW, Visser GHA. Male predominance of congenital malformations in infants of women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32 (07) 1194-1195
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Persson M, Fadl H. Perinatal outcome in relation to fetal sex in offspring to mothers with pre-gestational and gestational diabetes—a population-based study. Diabet Med 2014; 31 (09) 1047-1054
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Cidade-Rodrigues C, Chaves C, Melo A. et al. Association between foetal sex and adverse neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 309 (04) 1287-1294
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Onuoha C, Schulte CCM, Thaweethai T. et al. The simultaneous occurrence of gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy affects fetal growth and neonatal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 231 (05) 548.e1-548.e21
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135 (06) e237-e260
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Do NC, Vestgaard M, Nørgaard SK, Damm P, Mathiesen ER, Ringholm L. Prediction and prevention of preeclampsia in women with preexisting diabetes: the role of home blood pressure, physical activity, and aspirin. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14: 1166884
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Oppermann MLDR, Alessi J, Hirakata VN, Wiegand DM, Reichelt AJ. Preeclampsia in women with pregestational diabetes—a cohort study. Hypertens Pregnancy 2020; 39 (01) 48-55
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Watson D, Rowan J, Neale L, Battin MR. Admissions to neonatal intensive care unit following pregnancies complicated by gestational or type 2 diabetes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 43 (06) 429-432
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Cordero L, Treuer SH, Landon MB, Gabbe SG. Management of infants of diabetic mothers. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998; 152 (03) 249-254
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Blankstein AR, Sigurdson SM, Frehlich L. et al. Pre-existing diabetes and stillbirth or perinatal mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 144 (05) 608-619
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Tennant PWG, Glinianaia SV, Bilous RW, Rankin J, Bell R. Pre-existing diabetes, maternal glycated haemoglobin, and the risks of fetal and infant death: a population-based study. Diabetologia 2014; 57 (02) 285-294
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Bennett SN, Tita A, Owen J, Biggio JR, Harper LM. Assessing White's classification of pregestational diabetes in a contemporary diabetic population. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (05) 1217-1223
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Klemetti MM, Laivuori H, Tikkanen M, Nuutila M, Hiilesmaa V, Teramo K. White's classification and pregnancy outcome in women with type 1 diabetes: a population-based cohort study. Diabetologia 2016; 59 (01) 92-100
    Search in Google Scholar