Background and study aims: Safe peritoneal access and gastric closure are the most important concerns in the clinical application of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). We aimed to clarify the feasibility of a submucosal tunnel technique using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for transgastric peritoneal access and subsequent closure for NOTES.
Methods: Seven female pigs, each weighing about 40 kg were included in the study. The following procedures were performed: (i) after injection of normal saline into the submucosa, the mucosa was cut with a flex knife; (ii) the submucosal layer was dissected using an insulation-tipped electrosurgical knife to make a narrow longitudinal 50-mm submucosal tunnel; (iii) a small incision was made at the end of the tunnel and enlarged with a dilation balloon. After transgastric peritoneoscopy, the mucosal incision site was closed with clips. The following outcome measures were used: (a) evaluation of the technical feasibility of making a submucosal tunnel; (b) clinical monitoring for 7 days; (c) follow-up endoscopy and necropsy; and (d) peritoneal fluid culture.
Results: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic peritoneoscopy with a submucosal tunnel was successfully carried out in all pigs. The pigs recovered well, without signs of peritonitis. Follow-up endoscopy showed healing of mucosal incision sites without open defects. Necropsy revealed no findings of peritonitis, confirming completeness of gastric closure; there was a thin scar in one pig and adhesion of the omentum in six pigs. Peritoneal fluid culture demonstrated no bacterial growth.
Conclusions: The submucosal tunnel technique is feasible and effective for transgastric peritoneal access and closure.
References
1
Baron T H.
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.
Br J Surg.
2007;
94
1-2
2
Pearl J P, Ponsky J L.
Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a critical review.
J Gastrointest Surg.
2008;
12
1293-1300
3
Swain C P.
A justification for NOTES – natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery [editorial].
Gastrointest Endosc.
2007;
65
514
4
Hawes R H.
ASGE/SAGES Working Group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
199-203
5
Rattner D, Kalloo A N.
ASGE/SAGES Working Group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.
Surg Endosc.
2006;
20
329-333
6
Voermans R P, Van Berge Henegouwen M I, Fockens P.
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).
Endoscopy.
2007;
39
1013-1017
7
Kalloo A N, Singh V K, Jagannath S B. et al .
Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic intervention in the peritoneal cavity.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2004;
60
114-117
8
Park P O, Bergstrome M, Ikeda K. et al .
Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
61
601-606
9
Jagannath S B, Kantsevoy S V, Vaughn C A. et al .
Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long term survival in a porcine model.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
61
449-453
10
Feretis C, Kalantzopoulos D, Koulouris P. et al .
Endoscopic transgastric procedures in anesthetized pigs: technical challenges, complications, and survival.
Endoscopy.
2007;
39
394-400
11
Kantsevoy S V, Jagannath S B, Niiyama H. et al .
Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62
287-292
12
Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S. et al .
Surgery without scars.
Arch Surg.
2007;
142
823-826
13
Bessler M, Stevens P D, Milone L. et al .
Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: a hybrid approach to natural orifice surgery.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2007;
66
1243-1245
14
Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T. et al .
Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer.
Gut.
2001;
48
225-229
15
Gotoda T, Yamamoto H, Soetikno R M.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer.
J Gastroenterol.
2006;
41
929-942
16
Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse C A. et al .
Endoscopic full-thickness resection with sutured closure in a porcine model.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62
122-129
17
Meireles O R, Kantsevoy S V, Assumpcao L R. et al .
Reliable gastric closure after natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using a novel automated flexible stapling device.
Surg Endosc.
2008;
22
1609-1613
18
Hu B, Chung S C, Sun L C. et al .
Eagle Claw II: A novel endosuture device that uses a curved needle for major arterial bleeding: a bench study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62
266-270
19
Merrifield B F, Wagh M S, Thompson C C.
Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
693-697
20
Sumiyama K, Gostout C J, Rajan E. et al .
Submucosal endoscopy with mucosal flap safety valve.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2007;
65
688-694
21
Sumiyama K, Gostout C J, Rajan E. et al .
Transgastric cholecystectomy: transgastric accessibility to the gallbladder improved with the SEMF method and a novel multibending therapeutic endoscope.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2007;
65
1028-1034
22
Moyer M T, Pauli E M, Haluck R S. et al .
A self-approximating transluminal access technique for potential use in NOTES: an ex vivo porcine model.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2007;
66
974-978
23
Delius S V, Gillen S, Doundoulakis E. et al .
Comparison of transgastric access techniques for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
68
940-947
24
Pauli E M, Moyer M T, Haluck R S. et al .
Self-approximating transluminal access technique for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a porcine survival study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
690-697
F. YoshizumiMD
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Oita University Faculty of Medicine
11 Idaigaoka, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
Fax: +81-97-5496039
Email: Fumitaka@med.oita-u.ac.jp