Endoscopy 2009; 41(9): 762-766
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215009
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Predictive role of capsule endoscopy on the insertion route of double-balloon enteroscopy

X.  Li1 , 2 , H.  Chen1 , J.  Dai1 , Y.  Gao1 , 2 , Z.  Ge1 , 2
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • 2Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 9 January 2009

accepted after revision 8 July 2009

Publication Date:
06 August 2009 (online)

Background and study aims: Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) has been suggested to be more efficient if based on the results of screening video capsule endoscopy (VCE). We evaluated the utility of VCE for predicting the best insertion route of DBE for the evaluation and treatment of small-bowel lesions.

Patients and methods: Results of studies of patients with complete VCE examination of the small bowel and with findings confirmed by DBE are reported. A location index of lesions found on VCE was defined as the time from the pylorus to the lesion as a percentage of the time from the pylorus to the ileocecal valve. Based on our previous retrospective evaluation, a cut-off value of 0.6 was adopted, and the oral or anal approach was selected when the index was ≤ 0.6 or > 0.6, respectively.

Results: Data from 60 patients who underwent both VCE and DBE examinations and in whom the capsule reached the cecum were evaluated. Lesions shown on VCE were all reached by the first DBE procedures (41 orally and 19 anally). Based on the time index cut-off value of 0.6, the accuracy of selecting the insertion route of DBE was 100 %.

Conclusion: DBE is an effective approach for confirming VCE results. In patients with complete small-bowel investigation by VCE, the best insertion route for DBE can be reliably indicated using a time index based on the VCE records.

References

  • 1 Buchman A L, Wallin A. Video capsule endoscopy renders obscure gastrointestinal bleeding no longer obscure.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;  37 303-306
  • 2 Tang S, Haber G. Capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2004;  14 11-16
  • 3 Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E. et al . Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  126 643-653
  • 4 Delvaux M, Fassler I, Gay G. Clinical usefulness of the endoscopic video capsule as the initial intestinal investigation in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: validation of a diagnostic strategy based on the patient outcome after 12 months.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 1067-1073
  • 5 Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y. et al . Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 216-220
  • 6 Di Caro S, May A, Heine G DN. et al . The European experience with double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, methodology, safety and clinical impact.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 545-550
  • 7 May A, Nachbar L, Pohl J. et al . Endoscopic interventions in the small bowel using double balloon enteroscopy: feasibility and limitations.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 527-535
  • 8 Matsumoto T, Moriyama T, Esaki M. et al . Performance of antegrade double-balloon enteroscopy: comparison with push enteroscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 392-398
  • 9 Hadithi M, Heine G D, Jacobs M A. et al . A prospective study comparing video capsule endoscopy with double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 52-57
  • 10 Matsumoto T, Esaki M, Moriyama T. et al . Comparison of capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy with the double balloon method in patients with obscure bleeding and polyposis.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 827-832
  • 11 Nakamura M, Niwa Y, Ohmiya N. et al . Preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small bowel bleeding.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 59-66
  • 12 Kameda N, Higuchi K, Shiba M. et al . A prospective, single-blind trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  J Gastroenterol. 2008;  43 434-440
  • 13 Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sugano K. et al . Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 1010-1016
  • 14 Pasha S F, Leighton J A. How useful is capsule endoscopy for the selection of patients for double-balloon enteroscopy?.  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;  5 490-491
  • 15 Gay G, Delvaux M, Fassler I. Outcome of capsule endoscopy in determining indication and route for push-and-pull enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 49-58
  • 16 Zuckerman G R, Prakash C, Askin M P. et al . AGA technical review on the evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 201-221
  • 17 May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M. et al . Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique: method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the enteroscopy technique using the Erlangen Endo-Trainer.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 66-70
  • 18 Liao Z, Li Z S, Xu C. Reduction of capture rate in the stomach increases the complete examination rate of capsule endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 418-425
  • 19 Liao Z, Li F, Li Z S. Right lateral position improves complete examination rate of capsule endoscope: a prospective randomized, controlled trial.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 483-487

Z. GeMD 

Department of Gastroenterology
Shanghai Renji Hospital
Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease

145 Shan-dong zhong Rd
Shanghai 200001
China

Fax: +86-21-68383015

Email: zhizhengge@yahoo.com.cn

    >