Download PDF
Semin Reprod Med 2011; 29(6): 548-556
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1293208
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Is There a Role for Assisted Reproductive Technology in Recurrent Miscarriage?

Rosa Vissenberg1 , Mariëtte Goddijn1
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center (Q3-119), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 December 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Unexplained recurrent miscarriage (RM) is a significant health problem for which no effective treatment is available yet. In only 50% of couples with RM a cause can be found. In clinical practice, a frequently asked question is whether assisted reproductive technology (ART) is a treatment option. The scientific rationale and the chances of success for ART in couples with unexplained RM are still controversial. Presently, there is not enough evidence to justify IVF or intrauterine insemination (IUI) as a treatment option. Research on oocyte donation has been reported in one article. It is questionable whether couples with unexplained RM would undergo the potential risks and emotional aspects of ART. There is insufficient data on whether preimplantation genetic diagnosis improves the live birthrate in carriers of a structural chromosome rearrangement with a history of RM. No randomized controlled trials are available for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for unexplained RM. A recently published review concluded that the live birthrate for IVF/PGS and natural conception groups appears to be quite similar. Because evidence is lacking, we recommend refraining from ART in couples with recurrent miscarriage.

KEYWORDS

Recurrent miscarriage - assisted reproductive technology - preimplantation genetic screening - preimplantation genetic diagnosis - live birthrates

REFERENCES

  • 1 Farquharson R G, Jauniaux E, Exalto N. ESHRE Special Interest Group for Early Pregnancy (SIGEP) . Updated and revised nomenclature for description of early pregnancy events.  Hum Reprod. 2005;  20 (11) 3008-3011
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Jaslow C R, Carney J L, Kutteh W H. Diagnostic factors identified in 1020 women with two versus three or more recurrent pregnancy losses.  Fertil Steril. 2010;  93 (4) 1234-1243
    Google Scholar
  • 3 van den Boogaard E, Kaandorp S P, Franssen M T et al.. Consecutive or non-consecutive recurrent miscarriage: is there any difference in carrier status?.  Hum Reprod. 2010;  25 (6) 1411-1414
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Kaandorp S P, Goddijn M, van der Post J A et al.. Aspirin plus heparin or aspirin alone in women with recurrent miscarriage.  N Engl J Med. 2010;  362 (17) 1586-1596
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Li T C, Makris M, Tomsu M, Tuckerman E, Laird S. Recurrent miscarriage: aetiology, management and prognosis.  Hum Reprod Update. 2002;  8 (5) 463-481
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Clark D A, Coulam C B, Daya S, Chaouat G. Unexplained sporadic and recurrent miscarriage in the new millennium: a critical analysis of immune mechanisms and treatments.  Hum Reprod Update. 2001;  7 (5) 501-511
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage.  Lancet. 2006;  368 (9535) 601-611
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Empson M, Lassere M, Craig J, Scott J. Prevention of recurrent miscarriage for women with antiphospholipid antibody or lupus anticoagulant.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;  (2) CD002859
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Franssen M T, Korevaar J C, van der Veen F, Boer K, Leschot N J, Goddijn M. Management of recurrent miscarriage: evaluating the impact of a guideline.  Hum Reprod. 2007;  22 (5) 1298-1303
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Brigham S A, Conlon C, Farquharson R G. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 (11) 2868-2871
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Clifford K, Rai R, Regan L. Future pregnancy outcome in unexplained recurrent first trimester miscarriage.  Hum Reprod. 1997;  12 (2) 387-389
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Franssen M T, Korevaar J C, van der Veen F, Leschot N J, Bossuyt P M, Goddijn M. Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study.  BMJ. 2006;  332 (7544) 759-763
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Franssen M T, Korevaar J C, Tjoa W M et al.. Inherited unbalanced structural chromosome abnormalities at prenatal chromosome analysis are rarely ascertained through recurrent miscarriage.  Prenat Diagn. 2008;  28 (5) 408-411
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Barber J C, Cockwell A E, Grant E, Williams S, Dunn R, Ogilvie C M. Is karyotyping couples experiencing recurrent miscarriage worth the cost?.  BJOG. 2010;  117 (7) 885-888
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Okada S, Suzumori K. Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  73 (2) 300-304
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Carp H, Toder V, Aviram A, Daniely M, Mashiach S, Barkai G. Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  75 (4) 678-682
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Stephenson M D, Awartani K A, Robinson W P. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 (2) 446-451
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Stern J J, Dorfmann A D, Gutiérrez-Najar A J, Cerrillo M, Coulam C B. Frequency of abnormal karyotypes among abortuses from women with and without a history of recurrent spontaneous abortion.  Fertil Steril. 1996;  65 (2) 250-253
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Nybo Andersen A M, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study.  BMJ. 2000;  320 (7251) 1708-1712
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Hassold T, Hall H, Hunt P. The origin of human aneuploidy: where we have been, where we are going.  Hum Mol Genet. 2007;  16 Spec No. 2 R203-R208
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Hook E B, Albright S G. Mutation rates for unbalanced Robertsonian translocations associated with Down syndrome. Evidence for a temporal change in New York State live births 1968–1977.  Am J Hum Genet. 1981;  33 (3) 443-454
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy.  Nat Rev Genet. 2001;  2 (4) 280-291
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Bellver J, Meseguer M, Muriel L et al.. Y chromosome microdeletions, sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm oxidative stress as causes of recurrent spontaneous abortion of unknown etiology.  Hum Reprod. 2010;  25 (7) 1713-1721
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Wettasinghe T K, Jayasekara R W, Dissanayake V H. Y chromosome microdeletions are not associated with spontaneous recurrent pregnancy loss in a Sinhalese population in Sri Lanka.  Hum Reprod. 2010;  25 (12) 3152-3156
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Recurrent Miscarriage Immunotherapy Trialists Group . Worldwide collaborative observational study and meta-analysis on allogenic leukocyte immunotherapy for recurrent spontaneous abortion.  Am J Reprod Immunol. 1994;  32 (2) 55-72
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Clark D A, Chaouat G, Gorczynski R M. Thinking outside the box: mechanisms of environmental selective pressures on the outcome of the materno-fetal relationship.  Am J Reprod Immunol. 2002;  47 (5) 275-282
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Quenby S, Nik H, Innes B et al.. Uterine natural killer cells and angiogenesis in recurrent reproductive failure.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 (1) 45-54
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Clifford K, Flanagan A M, Regan L. Endometrial CD56 + natural killer cells in women with recurrent miscarriage: a histomorphometric study.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 (11) 2727-2730
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Lachapelle M H, Miron P, Hemmings R, Roy D C. Endometrial T, B, and NK cells in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Altered profile and pregnancy outcome.  J Immunol. 1996;  156 (10) 4027-4034
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Choudhury S R, Knapp L A. Human reproductive failure I: immunological factors.  Hum Reprod Update. 2001;  7 (2) 113-134
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Barnea E R. Embryo maternal dialogue: From pregnancy recognition to proliferation control.  Early Pregnancy. 2001;  5 (1) 65-66
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Clark D A. Is there any evidence for immunologically mediated or immunologically modifiable early pregnancy failure?.  J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;  20 (2) 63-72
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Creus M, Calafell J M, Cívico S et al.. Materno-fetal immunogenetic disparity: the biological basis for in vitro fertilization treatment in patients with unexplained recurrent abortion?.  Am J Reprod Immunol. 2003;  50 (5) 420-426
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Biljan M M, Buckett W M, Taylor C T et al.. Effect of abnormal hypo-osmotic swelling test on fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization cycles.  Fertil Steril. 1996;  66 (3) 412-416
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Saxena P, Misro M M, Chaki S P, Chopra K, Roy S, Nandan D. Is abnormal sperm function an indicator among couples with recurrent pregnancy loss?.  Fertil Steril. 2008;  90 (5) 1854-1858
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Gil-Villa A M, Cardona-Maya W, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Cadavid A. Assessment of sperm factors possibly involved in early recurrent pregnancy loss.  Fertil Steril. 2010;  94 (4) 1465-1472
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Bhattacharya S M. Hypo-osmotic swelling test and unexplained repeat early pregnancy loss.  J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;  36 (1) 119-122
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Hill J A, Abbott A F, Politch J A. Sperm morphology and recurrent abortion.  Fertil Steril. 1994;  61 (4) 776-778
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Puscheck E E, Jeyendran R S. The impact of male factor on recurrent pregnancy loss.  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  19 (3) 222-228
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Zolghadri J, Tavana Z, Alborzi S, Kazerooni T. Pregnancy outcome with intrauterine insemination in patients with unexplained recurrent abortion whose partners have abnormal hypo-osmotic swelling test.  Iran J Med Sci. 2009;  34 (3) 172-176
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Buckett W M, Luckas M J, Aird I A, Farquharson R G, Kingsland C R, Lewis-Jones D I. The hypo-osmotic swelling test in recurrent miscarriage.  Fertil Steril. 1997;  68 (3) 506-509
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson G D, de Mouzon J International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009.  Fertil Steril. 2009;  92 (5) 1520-1524
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Raziel A, Herman A, Strassburger D, Soffer Y, Bukovsky I, Ron-El R. The outcome of in vitro fertilization in unexplained habitual aborters concurrent with secondary infertility.  Fertil Steril. 1997;  67 (1) 88-92
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Christiansen O B, Nybo Andersen A M, Bosch E et al.. Evidence-based investigations and treatments of recurrent pregnancy loss.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  83 (4) 821-839
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Walch K T, Huber J C. Progesterone for recurrent miscarriage: truth and deceptions.  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;  22 (2) 375-389
    Google Scholar
  • 46 El-Zibdeh M Y. Dydrogesterone in the reduction of recurrent spontaneous abortion.  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;  97 (5) 431-434
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Hassold T, Chiu D. Maternal age-specific rates of numerical chromosome abnormalities with special reference to trisomy.  Hum Genet. 1985;  70 (1) 11-17
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Remohí J, Gallardo E, Levy M et al.. Oocyte donation in women with recurrent pregnancy loss.  Hum Reprod. 1996;  11 (9) 2048-2051
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Franssen M T, Musters A M, van der Veen F et al.. Reproductive outcome after PGD in couples with recurrent miscarriage carrying a structural chromosome abnormality: a systematic review.  Hum Reprod Update. 2011;  17 (4) 467-475
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Goossens V, Harton G, Moutou C, Traeger-Synodinos J, Van Rij M, Harper J C. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection IX: cycles from January to December 2006 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2007.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 (8) 1786-1810
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Otani T, Roche M, Mizuike M, Colls P, Escudero T, Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly improves the pregnancy outcome of translocation carriers with a history of recurrent miscarriage and unsuccessful pregnancies.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;  13 (6) 869-874
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Munné S, Chen S, Fischer J et al.. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis reduces pregnancy loss in women aged 35 years and older with a history of recurrent miscarriages.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  84 (2) 331-335
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Fischer J, Colls P, Escudero T, Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) improves pregnancy outcome for translocation carriers with a history of recurrent losses.  Fertil Steril. 2010;  94 (1) 283-289
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Stephenson M D, Goddijn M. A critical look at the evidence does not support PGD for translocation carriers with a history of recurrent losses.  Fertil Steril. 2011;  95 (1) e1 author reply e2
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Musters A M, Taminiau-Bloem E F, van den Boogaard E, van der Veen F, Goddijn M. Supportive care for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: patients' perspectives.  Hum Reprod. 2011;  26 (4) 873-877
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Gianaroli L, Magli M C, Ferraretti A P, Tabanelli C, Trombetta C, Boudjema E. The role of preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;  4 (Suppl 3) 31-36
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Werlin L, Rodi I, DeCherney A, Marello E, Hill D, Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as both a therapeutic and diagnostic tool in assisted reproductive technology.  Fertil Steril. 2003;  80 (2) 467-468
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Rubio C, Pehlivan T, Rodrigo L, Simón C, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Embryo aneuploidy screening for unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a minireview.  Am J Reprod Immunol. 2005;  53 (4) 159-165
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Mantzouratou A, Mania A, Fragouli E et al.. Variable aneuploidy mechanisms in embryos from couples with poor reproductive histories undergoing preimplantation genetic screening.  Hum Reprod. 2007;  22 (7) 1844-1853
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Harper J C, Boelaert K, Geraedts J et al.. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection V: cycles from January to December 2002 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2003.  Hum Reprod. 2006;  21 (1) 3-21
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Goossens V, Harton G, Moutou C European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology PGD Consortium et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VIII: cycles from January to December 2005 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2006.  Hum Reprod. 2008;  23 (12) 2629-2645
    Google Scholar
  • 62 Thornhill A R, deDie-Smulders C E, Geraedts J P ESHRE PGD Consortium et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium ‘Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)’.  Hum Reprod. 2005;  20 (1) 35-48
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine . Preimplantation genetic diagnosis.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  86 (5, Suppl 1) S257-S258
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Musters A M, Repping S, Korevaar J C et al.. Pregnancy outcome after preimplantation genetic screening or natural conception in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review of the best available evidence.  Fertil Steril. 2011;  95 (6) 2153-2157 2157 e1-e3
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Christiansen O B, Mathiesen O, Husth M, Lauritsen J G, Grunnet N. Placebo-controlled trial of active immunization with third party leukocytes in recurrent miscarriage.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994;  73 (3) 261-268
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Clifford K, Rai R, Watson H, Franks S, Regan L. Does suppressing luteinising hormone secretion reduce the miscarriage rate? Results of a randomised controlled trial.  BMJ. 1996;  312 (7045) 1508-1511
    Google Scholar
  • 67 Stephenson M D, Dreher K, Houlihan E, Wu V. Prevention of unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion using intravenous immunoglobulin: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.  Am J Reprod Immunol. 1998;  39 (2) 82-88
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Ober C, Karrison T, Odem R R et al.. Mononuclear-cell immunisation in prevention of recurrent miscarriages: a randomised trial.  Lancet. 1999;  354 (9176) 365-369
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Ramhorst R, Agriello E, Zittermann S et al.. Is the paternal mononuclear cells' immunization a successful treatment for recurrent spontaneous abortion?.  Am J Reprod Immunol. 2000;  44 (3) 129-135
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Pandey M K, Agrawal S. Induction of MLR-Bf and protection of fetal loss: a current double blind randomized trial of paternal lymphocyte immunization for women with recurrent spontaneous abortion.  Int Immunopharmacol. 2004;  4 (2) 289-298
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Scarpellini F, Sbracia M. Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a randomised controlled trial.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 (11) 2703-2708
    Google Scholar
  • 72 Wilding M, Forman R, Hogewind G et al.. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for the treatment of failed in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer and habitual abortion.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  81 (5) 1302-1307
    Google Scholar
  • 73 Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I, Devroey P. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in women older than 37 years.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  84 (2) 319-324
    Google Scholar

Mariëtte GoddijnM.D. Ph.D. 

Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center (Q3-119), University of Amsterdam

P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Email: m.goddijn@amc.uva.nl

      >