Aktuelle Neurologie 2011; 38(08): 414-427
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1295470
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Primärprävention des Schlaganfalls – Was ist neu?

Primary Prevention of Stroke – What is New?
D. Sander
1   Klinik für Neurologie, Benedictus Krankenhaus Tutzing
2   Neurologische Klinik des Klinikums rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
,
H. Poppert
2   Neurologische Klinik des Klinikums rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
,
K. Sander
2   Neurologische Klinik des Klinikums rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
3   Klinik für Psychosomatik, Schön Klinikum Berchtesgadener Land
,
T. Etgen
4   Kliniken Südostbayern – Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein
5   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 November 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Trotz der Fortschritte im Bereich der Akutbehandlung und Sekundärprävention des Schlaganfalls, stellt dieser weiterhin die wichtigste Ursache für dauernde Behinderung und die zweithäufigste Todesursache weltweit dar. Die wesentlichen Risikofaktoren für den Schlaganfall sind gut bekannt und können in nichtveränderbare (z. B. Alter, Geschlecht, genetische Prädisposition) und modifizierbare (z. B. Hypertonus, Nikotin, Diabetes) unterteilt werden. Die INTERSTROKE-Studie zeigte, dass 5 Faktoren (anamestischer Hypertonus oder Blutdruck >160/90 mm Hg, Rauchen, Taille-Hüft-Quotient, Ernährung und Bewegungsmangel) insgesamt 83,4% des Schlaganfallrisikos erklären. In der vorliegenden Übersichtsarbeit werden aktuelle Entwicklungen der Primärprävention des Schlaganfalls dargestellt. Dazu gehören die Bedeutung der Blutdruckvariabilität, neue Daten zu Statinen und Antithrombotika, die Therapie der asymptomatischen Karotistenose sowie der Stellenwert nichtmedikamentöser Maßnahmen im Rahmen einer „Lifestyle“-Modifikation.

Abstract

In spite of the improvements in acute stroke therapy as well as effective secondary prevention measures, stroke remains the most important disease for permanent disability and is the second most frequent cause of death worldwide. The risk factors for stroke are well known and have been subdivided into non-modifiable (e. g., age, sex, genetic predisposition) and modifiable (e. g., hypertension, smoking, diabetes). The INTERSTROKE study shows that 5 risk factors (history of hypertension or blood pressure >160/90 mm Hg, smoking, waste-to-hip ratio, physical inactivity and diet-risk score account for 83.4% of the stroke risk in the population. This review focusses on recent developments of primary stroke prevention including the importance of blood pressure variability, new data concerning statins and antithrombotics, the therapy for an asymptomatic carotid stenosis as well as the role of non-medical measures in the framework of lifestyle changes.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Goldstein LB, Bushnell CD, Adams RJ et al. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011; 42: 517-584
  • 2 Investigators ERoSEROS) . Heuschmann PU, Di Carlo A et al. Incidence of stroke in Europe at the beginning of the 21st century. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation 2009; 40: 1557-1563
  • 3 De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 1601-1610
  • 4 Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: full text. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007; 14 (Suppl. 02) S1-S113
  • 5 Laufs U, Rettig-Ewen V, Bohm M. Strategies to improve drug adherence. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 264-268
  • 6 Lee JK, Grace KA, Taylor AJ. Effect of a pharmacy care program on medication adherence and persistence, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 2563-2571
  • 7 ODonnell MJ, Xavier D, Liu L et al. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study. The Lancet 2010; 376: 112-123
  • 8 Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560-2572
  • 9 Vasan RS, Beiser A, Seshadri S et al. Residual lifetime risk for developing hypertension in middle-aged women and men: The Framingham Heart Study. JAMA 2002; 287: 1003-1010
  • 10 Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR et al. Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA 2003; 289: 2363-2369
  • 11 Whelton PK, He J, Appel LJ et al. Primary prevention of hypertension: clinical and public health advisory from The National High Blood Pressure Education Program. JAMA 2002; 288: 1882-1888
  • 12 Rothwell PM. Limitations of the usual blood-pressure hypothesis and importance of variability, instability, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 2010; 375: 938-948
  • 13 Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E et al. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 2010; 375: 895-905
  • 14 Cutler JA, Sorlie PD, Wolz M et al. Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control rates in United States adults between 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Hypertension 2008; 52: 818-827
  • 15 Girerd X, Giral P. Risk stratification for the prevention of cardiovascular complications of hypertension. Curr Med Res Opin 2004; 20: 1137-1142
  • 16 Sokol SI, Kapoor JR, Foody JM. Blood pressure reduction in the primary and secondary prevention of stroke. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2006; 4: 155-160
  • 17 Law MR, Morris JK, Wald NJ. Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2009; 338: b1665-b1665
  • 18 Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei E et al. Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. J Hypertens 2009; 27: 2121-2158
  • 19 Etgen T, Brönner M, Sander D et al. Somatic factors in cognitive impairment. Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie 2009; 77: 72-82
  • 20 Hachinski V, Donnan GA, Gorelick PB et al. Stroke: working toward a prioritized world agenda. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation 2010; 41: 1084-1099
  • 21 Zanchetti A, Grassi G, Mancia G. When should antihypertensive drug treatment be initiated and to what levels should systolic blood pressure be lowered? A critical reappraisal. J Hypertens 2009; 27: 923-934
  • 22 Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet 1998; 351: 1755-1762
  • 23 Beckett NS, Peters R, Fletcher AE et al. Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. The New England journal of medicine 2008; 358: 1887-1898
  • 24 Webb AJS, Fischer U, Mehta Z et al. Effects of antihypertensive-drug class on interindividual variation in blood pressure and risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2010; 375: 906-915
  • 25 Webb AJS, Rothwell PM. Effect of dose and combination of antihypertensives on interindividual blood pressure variability. Stroke 2011; 42 [in press]
  • 26 Esler MD, Krum H, Sobotka PA et al. Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 1903-1909
  • 27 Goldstein LB, Bushnell CD, Adams RJ et al. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011; 42: 517-584
  • 28 Amarenco P, Labreuche J. Lipid management in the prevention of stroke: review and updated meta-analysis of statins for stroke prevention. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 453-463
  • 29 Petretta M, Costanzo P, Perrone-Filardi P et al. Impact of gender in primary prevention of coronary heart disease with statin therapy: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2009; 138: 25-31
  • 30 Abramson J, Wright JM. Are lipid-lowering guidelines evidence-based?. Lancet 2007; 369: 168-169
  • 31 Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005; 366: 1267-1278
  • 32 Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease among patients with low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: rationale and design of the JUPITER trial. Circulation 2003; 108: 2292-2297
  • 33 Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2195-2207
  • 34 Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2011; 376: 1670-1681
  • 35 Taylor F, Ward K, Moore TH et al. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; CD004816
  • 36 Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation 2004; 110: 227-239
  • 37 Greving JP, Visseren FL, de Wit GA et al. Statin treatment for primary prevention of vascular disease: whom to treat? Cost-effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2011; 342: d1672 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d1672.
  • 38 Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM et al. Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet 2010; 375: 735-742
  • 39 Preiss D, Seshasai SR, Welsh P et al. Risk of incident diabetes with intensive-dose compared with moderate-dose statin therapy: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2011; 305: 2556-2564
  • 40 Feher A, Pusch G, Koltai K et al. Statintherapy in the primary and the secondary prevention of ischaemic cerebrovascular diseases. Int J Cardiol 2010; 148: 131-138
  • 41 de Weerd M, Greving JP, Hedblad B et al. Prevalence of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Stroke 2010; 41: 1294-1297
  • 42 Goessens BMB, Visseren FLJ, Kappelle LJ et al. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and the risk of new vascular events in patients with manifest arterial disease: the SMART study. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation 2007; 38: 1470-1475
  • 43 Marquardt L, Geraghty OC, Mehta Z et al. Low risk of ipsilateral stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis on best medical treatment: a prospective, population-based study. Stroke 2010; 41: e11-e7
  • 44 Silver FL, Mackey A, Clark WM et al. Safety of Stenting and Endarterectomy by Symptomatic Status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation 2011; 42: 675-680
  • 45 Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. The New England journal of medicine 2010; 363: 11-23
  • 46 Woo K, Garg J, Hye RJ et al. Contemporary results of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 2010; 41: 975-979
  • 47 Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J et al. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1491-1502
  • 48 Markus HS, King A, Shipley M et al. Asymptomatic embolisation for prediction of stroke in the Asymptomatic Carotid Emboli Study (ACES): a prospective observational study. Lancet neurology 2010; 9: 663-671
  • 49 AbuRahma AF, Wulu JTJ, Crotty B. Carotid plaque ultrasonic heterogeneity and severity of stenosis. Stroke 2002; 33: 1772-1775
  • 50 Topakian R, King A, Kwon SU et al. Ultrasonic plaque echolucency and emboli signals predict stroke in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Neurology 2011; 77: 751-758
  • 51 Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA et al. 2010; ACCF/AHA Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults: Executive Summary. JAC 2010; 56: 2182-2199
  • 52 Heeringa J, van der Kuip DA, Hofman A et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 949-953
  • 53 Watson T, Shantsila E, Lip GY. Mechanisms of thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation: Virchow’s triad revisited. Lancet 2009; 373: 155-166
  • 54 Spence JD, Hackam DG. Treating arteries instead of risk factors: a paradigm change in management of atherosclerosis. Stroke 2010; 41: 1193-1199
  • 55 Weber R, Diener HC, Weimar C. Prevention of cardioembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2010; 8: 1405-1415
  • 56 Hohnloser SH, Pajitnev D, Pogue J et al. Incidence of stroke in paroxysmal versus sustained atrial fibrillation in patients taking oral anticoagulation or combined antiplatelet therapy: an ACTIVE W Substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 2156-2161
  • 57 Abbott AL. Medical (nonsurgical) intervention alone is now best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis: results of a systematic review and analysis. Stroke 2009; 40: e573-e583
  • 58 Ziegler PD, Glotzer TV, Daoud EG et al. Incidence of newly detected atrial arrhythmias via implantable devices in patients with a history of thromboembolic events. Stroke 2010; 41: 256-260
  • 59 Group SRiAFW . Comparison of 12 risk stratification schemes to predict stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Stroke 2008; 39: 1901-1910
  • 60 Singer DE, Chang Y, Fang MC et al. The net clinical benefit of warfarin anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 297-305
  • 61 Hobbs FD, Fitzmaurice DA, Mant J et al. A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in people aged 65 and over. The SAFE study. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9 iii–iv, ix–x 1-74
  • 62 Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2369-2429
  • 63 Man-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A. Anticoagulant-related bleeding in older persons with atrial fibrillation: physicians’ fears often unfounded. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 1580-1586
  • 64 Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R et al. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest 2010; 138: 1093-1100
  • 65 Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 857-867
  • 66 Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Hart RG et al. Effect of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2066-2078
  • 67 Connolly S, Pogue J, Hart R et al. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006; 367: 1903-1912
  • 68 Hylek EM, Evans-Molina C, Shea C et al. Major hemorrhage and tolerability of warfarin in the first year of therapy among elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2007; 115: 2689-2696
  • 69 Hylek EM, Go AS, Chang Y et al. Effect of intensity of oral anticoagulation on stroke severity and mortality in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1019-1026
  • 70 Shapiro NL. Patient barriers and solutions for INR self-testing. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2008; 25: 14-15
  • 71 Shireman TI, Howard PA, Kresowik TF et al. Combined anticoagulant-antiplatelet use and major bleeding events in elderly atrial fibrillation patients. Stroke 2004; 35: 2362-2367
  • 72 Singer DE, Albers GW, Dalen JE et al. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133: 546S-592S
  • 73 Rubboli A, Halperin JL, Airaksinen KE et al. Antithrombotic therapy in patients treated with oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary artery stenting. An expert consensus document with focus on atrial fibrillation. Ann Med 2008; 40: 428-436
  • 74 King 3rd SB, Smith Jr SC, Hirshfeld Jr JW et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51 172-209
  • 75 Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1139-1151
  • 76 Gage BF. Can we rely on RE-LY?. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1200-1202
  • 77 Wann LS, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (update on Dabigatran): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2011; 123: 1144-1150
  • 78 Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 883-891
  • 79 Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 806-817
  • 80 Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 981-992
  • 81 http://www.vfa.de/de/arzneimittel-forschung/woran-wir-forschen/anti-thrombotika.html
  • 82 Diener HC, Weber R, Weimar C et al. Dabigatran zur Schlaganfallprävention bei Patienten mit Vorhofflimmern. Psychopharmakotherapie 2011; 18: 156-163
  • 83 Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S et al. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2667-2677
  • 84 Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJ, van Eickels M et al. Dronedarone in patients with congestive heart failure: insights from ATHENA. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 1717-1721
  • 85 http://en.sanofi.com/binaries/20110707_PALLAS_en_tcm28-33021.pdf
  • 86 Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2009; 374: 534-542
  • 87 Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 659-666
  • 88 Terasawa T, Balk EM, Chung M et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 191-202
  • 89 Lee SH, Tai CT, Hsieh MH et al. Predictors of early and late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2004; 10: 221-226
  • 90 Ridker PM, Cook NR, Lee IM et al. A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1293-1304
  • 91 Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians’ Health Study. Steering Committee of the Physicians’ Health Study Research Group. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 129-135
  • 92 Collaboration ATATT . Baigent C, Blackwell L et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet 2009; 373: 1849-1860
  • 93 De Berardis G, Sacco M, Strippoli GF et al. Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in people with diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2009; 339: b4531
  • 94 Fowkes FGR, Price JF, Stewart MCW et al. Aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events in a general population screened for a low ankle brachial index: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association; 2010. 303. 841-848
  • 95 Chiuve SE, Rexrode KM, Spiegelman D et al. Primary prevention of stroke by healthy lifestyle. Circulation 2008; 118: 947-954
  • 96 Fang J, Keenan NL, Ayala C et al. Fruits and vegetables intake and physical activity among hypertensive adults in the United States: behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2003 and 2007. Am J Hypertens 2010; 23: 762-766
  • 97 Schmitz R, Jordan S, Muters S et al. Population-wide use of behavioural prevention and counselling programmes for lifestyle-related cardiovascular risk factors in Germany. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2011; [in press]
  • 98 Strazzullo P, DElia L, Kandala NB et al. Salt intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ 2009; 339: b4567 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b4567.
  • 99 Mozaffarian D, Longstreth Jr WT, Lemaitre RN et al. Fish consumption and stroke risk in elderly individuals: the cardiovascular health study. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 200-206
  • 100 He K, Rimm EB, Merchant A et al. Fish consumption and risk of stroke in men. Jama 2002; 288: 3130-3136
  • 101 Myint PK, Welch AA, Bingham SA et al. Habitual fish consumption and risk of incident stroke: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk prospective population study. Public Health Nutr 2006; 9: 882-888
  • 102 Larsson SC, Virtamo J, Wolk A. Fish consumption and risk of stroke in Swedish women. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 93: 487-493
  • 103 Larsson SC, Virtamo J, Wolk A. Red meat consumption and risk of stroke in Swedish women. Stroke 2010; 42: 324-329
  • 104 Lopez-Garcia E, van Dam RM, Qi L et al. Coffee consumption and markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in healthy and diabetic women. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 84: 888-893
  • 105 Larsson SC, Virtamo J, Wolk A. Coffee consumption and risk of stroke in women. Stroke 2011; 42: 908-912
  • 106 Samieri C, Feart C, Proust-Lima C et al. Olive oil consumption, plasma oleic acid, and stroke incidence: The Three-City Study. Neurology 2011; 77: 418-425
  • 107 Cappuccio FP, Cooper D, D'Elia L et al. Sleep duration predicts cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 1484-1492
  • 108 Redline S, Yenokyan G, Gottlieb DJ et al. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and incident stroke: the sleep heart health study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 182: 269-277
  • 109 Sattelmair JR, Kurth T, Buring JE et al. Physical activity and risk of stroke in women. Stroke 2010; 41: 1243-1250
  • 110 Willey JZ, Moon YP, Paik MC et al. Lower prevalence of silent brain infarcts in the physically active: the Northern Manhattan Study. Neurology 2011; 76: 2112-2118
  • 111 Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 2004; 364: 937-952
  • 112 Veltkamp R, Hacke W. New oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation. Nervenarzt 2011; 82 180, 182-184, 186-189