Arzneimittelforschung 2011; 61(2): 75-79
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296170
CNS-active Drugs · Hypnotics · Psychotropics · Sedatives
Editio Cantor Verlag Aulendorf (Germany)

Bioequivalence evaluation of two dosage forms of olanzapine 10 mg formulations in healthy volunteers

Mercedes Cánovas
1   Laboratorios Lesvi, S.L. – Invent Farma Group, Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain
,
Ferran Torres
2   Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
,
Gema Domenech
2   Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
,
Jesús Cebrecos
3   Laboratorio de análisis Dr. Echevarne, Barcelona, Spain
,
Pilar Pelagio
3   Laboratorio de análisis Dr. Echevarne, Barcelona, Spain
,
Marcela Manríquez
4   Clinical Pharmacology Unit (UASP), Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
5   working at the institution at the time of the trial
,
Gemma Martínez
1   Laboratorios Lesvi, S.L. – Invent Farma Group, Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain
5   working at the institution at the time of the trial
,
Marta Arcabell
1   Laboratorios Lesvi, S.L. – Invent Farma Group, Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain
,
Francesc Cabré
1   Laboratorios Lesvi, S.L. – Invent Farma Group, Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 November 2011 (online)

Abstract

Two bioequivalence studies were carried out in healthy volunteers in order to compare the rate and extent of absorption of two dosage forms (film-coated tablet and orodispersible tablet) of oral olanzapine (CAS 132539-06-1) 10 mg test formulations and the respective brand formulations as reference. Twenty and twenty-six subjects were administered olanzapine film-coated tablet or orodispersible tablet of test and reference formulations in an open-label, randomised, fasting, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study. Blood samples were taken before and within 240 h after drug administration. Plasma concentrations were determined by LC/MS/MS. Log-transformed AUC and Cmax values were tested for bioequivalence based on the ratios of the geometric means (test/reference). tmax was analysed nonparametrically. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean values for the test/reference ratios for AUC0−t and Cmax were within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80–125%. It may be therefore concluded that the test formulations of olanzapine 10 mg film-coated tablet and orodispersible tablet are bioequivalent to the reference products and can be prescribed interchangeably.