Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Study of Two Cetirizine Hydrochloride Formulations in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics and relative bio-availability/bioequivalence of two formulations of cetirizine hydrochloride (CAS 83881-51-0) were assessed in this paper. Using a two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, randomized crossover design, test and reference formulations were administered as individual single doses to 18 Chinese healthy male volunteers under non-fed conditions, with a 7-day washout period between dosing. Fourteen blood samples were drawn from each subject over a 34-h period. Cetirizine concentrations in plasma were determined by a validated high performance liquid chromatographic-ultraviolet (HPLC/UV) assay, and pharmacokinetic parameters, C_max, AUC_0–t, AUC_0–∞ and t_1/2 were calculated from the plasma concentration-time data of each individual and during each period by applying non-compartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic data for test and reference formulations were analyzed statistically to test for bioequivalence of the two formulations. After oral administration the values of C_max, t_max, t_1/2, MRT, AUC_0–t, AUC_0–∞ for test and reference formulations were 0.80 ± 0.14 and 0.80 ± 0.23 µg/ml, 0.8 ± 0.4 and 1.1 ± 0.7 h, 7.59 ± 0.68 and 7.63 ± 0.93 h, 10.59 ± 0.94 and 10.92 ± 1.26 h, 6.00 ± 1.04 and 5.98 ± 1.39 µg · h/ml, respectively. ANOVA and CI test showed no significant (p > 0.05) variation in these pharmacokinetic parameters of test and reference formulations. When the AUC_0–t values for both formulations for natural log-transformed data were compared, the test formulation showed a bioavailability of 100.9 ± 7.7%, as compared to the reference formulation. These values are within the acceptance limit of 80–125%. No adverse events were observed in any of the subjects during the two runs of the study. Both clinical and laboratory parameters of all subjects showed no clinically significant changes. This study shows that both formulations were well tolerated and the test formulation can be considered a pharmaceutically and therapeutically equivalent alternative to the reference formulation.

Key words

Antihistamine - CAS 83881-51-0 - Cetirizine hydrochloride, bioequivalence, pharmacokinetics

• References

• 1 Parfitt K. Martindale – The Complete Drug Reference. 32nd ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 1999. p. 404
• 2 Portnoy JM, Dinakar C. Review of cetirizine hydrochloride for the treatment of allergic disorders. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004; 5 (1) 125-35
• 3 Papich MG, Schooley EK, Reinero CR. Pharmacokinetics of cetirizine in healthy cats. Am J Vet Res. 2008; 69 (5) 670-4
• 4 Olsén L, Bondesson U, Broström H, Tjälve H, Ingvast-Larsson C. Cetirizine in horses: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics following repeated oral administration. Vet J. 2008; 177 (2) 242-9
• 5 Peytavin G, Gautran C, Otoul C, Cremieux AC, Moulaert B, Delatour F et al. Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interaction between cetirizine and ritonavir, an HIV-1 protease inhibitor, in healthy male volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005; 61 (4) 267-73
• 6 Grumetto L, Cennamo G, Del Prete A, La Rotonda MI, Barbato F. Pharmacokinetics of cetirizine in tear fluid after a single oral dose. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002; 41 (7) 525-31
• 7 Noiri E, Ozawa H, Fujita T, Nakao A. Pharmacokinetics of cetirizine in chronic hemodialysis patients: multiple-dose study. Nephron. 2001; 89 (1) 101-4
• 8 Pariente-Khayat A, Rey E, Dubois MC, Vauzelle-Kervroedan F, Pons G, D’athis P et al. Pharmacokinetics of cetirizine in 2- to 6-year-old children. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995; 33 (6) 340-4
• 9 Horsmans Y, Desager JP, Hulhoven R, Harvengt C. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of cetirizine in patients with chronic liver disease. J Clin Pharmacol. 1993; Oct 33 (10) 929-32
• 10 Xu FG, Zhang ZJ, Dong HJ, Tian Y, Liu Y, Chen Y. Bioequivalence assessment of two formulations of spironolactone in Chinese healthy male volunteers. Arzneimittelforschung. 2008; 58: 117-21
• 11 US Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for Industry, Bioanalytical Method Validation. 2001