Does the European Union Tissues and Cells Directive Improve Quality in the in Vitro Fertilization Laboratory? A Case Study in a Tertiary Referral Center

Abstract

Since 2004, assisted conception is encompassed by the European Directive on the Quality and Safety of Tissues and Cells (2004/23/EC). The aim of a standard for quality and safety is to minimize risks of errors, contamination, and accidents and to maximize efficiency of use. This article presents a case study of the implementation of the Tissues and Cells Directive in the Leuven University Fertility Center (LUFC) with a focus on the assisted reproductive technologies laboratory with respect to laboratory facilities, quality management system, traceability, storage conditions as well as serological screening. Although the current European Union (EU) Directive can be considered a step in the right direction to improve patient safety, questions remain as to whether the implementation of this EU Directive, requiring extra time and money, has resulted in higher quality with respect to the quality dimensions of effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, equity, and patient centeredness.

Keywords

medically assisted reproduction (MAR) - assisted reproductive technology (ART) - tissues and cells directive - quality indicators - laboratory - protocol drift - benchmarking

• References

• 1 The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004. Setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. Official Journal of the European Union 2004. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:102:0048:0058:en:PDF . Accessed April 10, 2012
• 2 The Commission of the European Communities. Commission Directive 2006/17/EC of 8 February 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for the donation, procurement and testing of human tissues and cells. Official Journal of the European Union 2006. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:038:0040:01:EN:HTML . Accessed April 10, 2012
• 3 The Commission of the European communities. Commission Directive 2006/86/EC of 24 October 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards traceability requirements, notification of serious adverse reactions and events and certain technical requirements for the coding, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. Official Journal of the European Union 2006. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:328:0021:0022:EN:PDF . Accessed April 10, 2012
• 4 Royal decree to set quality and safety standards for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human body materials, to be complied with by the banks for human body material, the intermediate structures for human body material, and the production institutions. Belgian Federal State Paper (Belgisch Staatsblad), September 28, 2009; 69402-69432
• 5 Magli MC, Van den Abbeel E, Lundin K, Royere D, Van der Elst J, Gianaroli L ; Committee of the Special Interest Group on Embryology. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories. Hum Reprod 2008; 23 (6) 1253-1262
• 6 Mourad SM, Hermens RPMG, Nelen WLDM, Braat DDM, Grol RPTM, Kremer JAM. Guideline-based development of quality indicators for subfertility care. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (10) 2665-2672
• 7 Preservation of reproductive tissues and cells by vitrification. Publication of the Belgian High Health Council (Hoge Gezondheidsraad); March 2, 2011. Nr 8630. Available at: www.health.belgium.be/.../public/.../19068219.pdf
• 8 Ad Hoc GM Inspections Services Group. Good Manufacturing Practice Proposed Addition (Annex 19) to the EU GMP Guide. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/pharmacos/docs/doc2004/july/gmp_an19proposal_en.pdf . June 2004. Brussels. Accessed April 10, 2012
• 9 Boone WR, Johnson JE, Locke AJ, Crane IV MM, Price TM. Control of air quality in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril 1999; 71 (1) 150-154
• 10 Esteves SC, Gomes AP, Verza S. Control of air pollution in ART laboratory and adjacent areas improves embryo formation, cleavage and pregnancy rates and decreases abortion rate: comparison between class 100 (ISO5) and a class 1000 (ISO6) clean room for micromanipulation and embryo culture. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: S259-S260
• 11 von Wyl S, Bersinger NA. Air quality in the IVF laboratory: results and survey. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004; 21 (10) 347-348
• 12 Wingfield M, Cottell E. Viral screening of couples undergoing partner donation in assisted reproduction with regard to EU Directives 2004/23/EC, 2006/17/EC and 2006/86/EC: what is the evidence for repeated screening?. Hum Reprod 2010; 25 (12) 3058-3065
• 13 van Empel IW, Dancet EA, Koolman XH , et al. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (3) 584-593
• 14 Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, Kohn LT, Maguire SK, Pike KC. Crossing the Quality Chasm. A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press; 2001
• 15 Brandes M, Hamilton CJCM, de Bruin JP, Nelen WL, Kremer JA. The relative contribution of IVF to the total ongoing pregnancy rate in a subfertile cohort. Hum Reprod 2010; 25 (1) 118-126
• 16 Pinborg A, Hougaard CO, Nyboe Andersen A, Molbo D, Schmidt L. Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1338 couples initiating infertility treatment. Hum Reprod 2009; 24 (4) 991-999
• 17 Terävä AN, Gissler M, Hemminki E, Luoto R. Infertility and use of infertility treatments in Finland: Prevalence and socio-demographic determinants 1991–2001. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 136: 61-66
• 18 Lass A, Brinsden P. How do patients choose private in vitro fertilization treatment? A customer survey in a tertiary fertility center in the United Kingdom. Fertil Steril 2001; 75 (5) 893-897
• 19 Verberg MF, Eijkemans MJ, Heijnen EM , et al. Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 2008; 23 (9) 2050-2055
• 20 Dancet EA, Nelen WL, Sermeus W, De Leeuw L, Kremer JA, D'Hooghe TM. The patients' perspective on fertility care: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16 (5) 467-487
• 21 van Empel IW, Dancet EA, Koolman XH , et al. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (3) 584-593
• 22 Patwardhan A, Patwardhan P. Are consumer surveys valuable as a service improvement tool in health services? A critical appraisal. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2009; 22 (7) 670-685
• 23 Berwick DM. What 'patient-centered' should mean: confessions of an extremist. Health Aff 2009; 28: w555-w565
• 24 Fremont AM, Cleary PD, Hargraves JL, Rowe RM, Jacobson NB, Ayanian JZ. Patient-centered processes of care and long-term outcomes of myocardial infarction. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16 (12) 800-808
• 25 Meterko M, Wright S, Lin H, Lowy E, Cleary PD. Mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction: the influences of patient-centered care and evidence-based medicine. Health Serv Res 2010; 45 (5 Pt 1) 1188-1204
• 26 Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A , et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000; 49 (9) 796-804
• 27 Ryan M. Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48 (4) 535-546
• 28 Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J , et al; International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology; World Health Organization. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril 2009; 92 (5) 1520-1524