Download PDF
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2013; 230(8): 814-819
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328422
Klinische Studie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

OCT-, anatomische und funktionelle Ergebnisse nach Plombenchirurgie bei Macula-off rhegmatogener Ablatio retinae

Optical Coherence Tomography: Anatomic and Functional Outcome after Scleral Buckling Surgery in Macula-off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
I. Akkoyun
Department of Ophthalmology, Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
,
G. Yilmaz
Department of Ophthalmology, Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 11 December 2012

akzeptiert 06 February 2013

Publication Date:
13 May 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Es war Ziel dieser retrospektiven Studie über die anatomischen, funktionellen und optikkohärenztomografischen (OCT-) Ergebnisse nach Plombenchirurgie bei Macula-off rhegmatogener Ablatio retinae zu berichten.

Material und Methoden: 87 Patienten (87 Augen), die wegen einer rhegmatogenen Macula-off Ablatio mit Plombenchirurgie versorgt worden waren und postoperativ eine Nachbeobachtungszeit ≥ 6 Monate aufwiesen, wurden in die Studie aufgenommen. Patienten mit Riesenriss, Oradialyse, chorioretinaler Dystrophie, proliferativer Vitreoretinopathie (PVR) ≥ C1, Schisisamotio und Glaskörpertrübung wurden ausgeschlossen. Die Netzhautwiederanlage und die prä- und postoperative Sehleistung wurden untersucht. Zur Analyse der Photorezeptor-Innen/Außensegmente (IS/OS) und der External-Limiting-Membrane-(ELM-)Integrität wurde eine Spektral-Domain-OCT-Untersuchung durchgeführt. Die potenziellen Risikofaktoren, welche die postoperative Sehleistung beeinflussen, wurden mit linearer multivariater Regression analysiert.

Ergebnisse: Eine primäre Netzhautanlage wurde bei 81 Augen (93,8 %) erreicht. Die finale Erfolgsrate nach Pars-plana-Vitrektomie mit Silikonöltamponade lag bei 98,7 % (86 Augen). Erhaltene ELM- (OR 0,58; p = 0,004) und IS/OS-Integrität (OR 0,84; p = 0,031) und eine Ablassung subretinaler Flüssigkeit (OR 0,42, p < 0.0001) wurden als signifikant unabhängige Faktoren ermittelt, welche die postoperative Sehleistung günstig beeinflussen. Dauer der Netzhautablösung > 6 Tage (OR 1,46; p = 0,04), 2–3 Netzhautforamina (OR 1,30; OR 1,36; p < 0,0001) waren signifikant unabhängige Faktoren, die den postoperativen Visus ungünstig beeinflussen. Deutliche IS/OS-Diskontinuität war der wichtigste Faktor für den postoperativ ungünstigen Visus (β 0,724; OR 2,06; p < 0,0001).

Schlussfolgerung: Deutliche IS/OS-Diskontinuität nach erfolgreicher Chirurgie bei Macula-off rhegmatogener Ablatio retinae scheint ein wichtiger Prädiktor für die postoperative Sehleistung zu sein.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate results of optical coherence tomography (OCT) with regard to anatomic and functional outcome after scleral buckling surgery (SBS) in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods: Medical charts of 87 patients (87 eyes), who underwent SBS for macula off RRD were analysed retrospectively. Patients with follow-up ≥ 6 months were included. Exclusion criteria were giant retinal tears, retinal dialysis, chorioretinal dystrophies, proliferative vitreoretinopathy ≥ grade-C1, schisis detachment and vitreous opacities. Reattachment success rate, pre- and postoperative visual acuity (VA) were examined. Postoperative spectral-domain (SD) OCT images were evaluated. The status of photoreceptor inner segment/outer segment (IS/OS) and external limiting memrane (ELM) junction were analysed. Potential risk factors influencing postoperative VA were evaluated by using linear multivariate logistic regression.

Results: The primary anatomic success rate was 93.8 % (81 eyes), final success rate was 98.7 % (86 eyes). Preserved ELM (OR 0.58, p = 0.004) and IS/OS integrity (OR 0.84, p = 0.031), drainage of subretinal fluid (OR 0.42, p < 0.0001) were detected as significant independent factors for influencing postoperative VA favourably. Duration of detachment > 6 days (OR 1.46, p = 0.04), two/three retinal breaks (OR 1.30, OR 1.36, p < 0.0001) were significant independent risk factors for a poor postoperative VA. Severe IS/OS disruption was the most important risk factor for poor postoperative VA (β 0.724, OR 2.06, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Severe IS/OS disruption may be the most important predictor of postoperative VA after successful surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Schlüsselwörter

rhegmatogene Netzhautablösung - Plombenchirurgie - Spektral-Domain-optische Kohärenztomografie

Key words

rhegmatogenous retinal detachment - scleral buckling surgery - spectral domain optical coherence tomography
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Joussen AM, Helbig H. Chirurgie der Netzhautablösung. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2011; 228: 185-186
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 2142-2154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schwartz SG, Flynn HW. Primary retinal detachment: scleral buckle or pars plana vitrectomy?. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17: 245-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gerding H. Results of primary buckling procedures indicated with regard to recommendations of the SPR study in cases with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2012; 229: 353-356
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Thelen U, Amler S, Osada N et al. Outcome of surgery after macula-off retinal detachment – results from MUSTARD, one of the largest data bases on buckling surgery in Europe. Acta Ophthalmol 2012; 90: 481-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Afrashi F, Akkin C, Egrilmez S et al. Anatomic outcome of scleral buckling surgery in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Int Ophthalmol 2005; 26: 77-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ross W, Lavina A, Russell M et al. The correlation between height of macular detachment and visual outcome in macula-off retinal detachments of < or = 7 daysʼ duration. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 1213-1217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mitarai K, Gomi F, Tano Y. Three-dimensionaloptical coherence tomographic findings in central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006; 244: 1415-1420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Smith AJ, Telander DG, Zawadzki RJ et al. High-resolution Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetric findings after macula-off retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1923-1929
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nakanishi H, Hangai M, Unoki N et al. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging of the detached macula in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 2009; 29: 232-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wakabayashi T, Oshima Y, Fujimoto H et al. Foveal microstructure and visual acuity after retinal detachment repair: imaging analysis by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 519-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Machemer R, Aaberg TM, Freeman HM et al. An updated classification of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 112: 159-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Martinez-Castillo V, Zapata MA, Boixadera A et al. Pars plana vitrectomy, laser retinopexy, and aqueous tamponade for pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 297-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hilford D, Hilford M, Mathew A et al. Posterior vitreous detachment following cataract surgery. Eye 2009; 23: 1388-1392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Heussen N, Hilgers RD, Heimann H et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): multiple-event analysis of risk factors for reoperations. SPR Study report no. 4. Acta Ophthalmol 2011; 89: 622-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bourla DH, Bor E, Axer-Siegel R et al. Outcomes and complications of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair with selective sutureless 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149: 630-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Raymond GL, Lavin MJ, Dodd CL et al. Suture needle drainage of subretinal fluid. Br J Ophthalmol 1993; 77: 428-429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Liem AT, Keunen JE, van Meel GJ et al. Serial foveal densitometry and visual function after retinal detachment surgery with macular involvement. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 1945-1952
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Benson SE, Schlottmann PG, Bunce C et al. Optical coherence tomography analysis of the macula after scleral buckle surgery for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 108-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Heussen N, Feltgen N, Walter P et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): predictive factors for functional outcome. Study report no. 6.; SPR Study Group. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249: 1129-1136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H et al. Pseudophakic and Aphakic Retinal Detachment (PARD) Study Group. Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation-report no. 1. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 1421-1429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Nakanishi H, Hangai M, Unoki N et al. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging of the detached macula in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 2009; 29: 232-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cook B, Lewis GP, Fisher SK et al. Apoptotic photoreceptor degeneration in experimental retinal detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36: 990-996
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lo AC, Woo TT, Wong RL et al. Apoptosis and other cell death mechanisms after retinal detachment: implications for photoreceptor rescue. Ophthalmologica 2011; 226: 10-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Arroyo JG, Yang L, Bula D et al. Photoreceptor apoptosis in human retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 605-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fisher SK, Lewis GP. Müller cell and neuronal remodeling in retinal detachment and reattachment and their potential consequences for visual recovery: a review and reconsideration of recent data. Vision Res 2003; 43: 887-897
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lai WW, Leung GY, Chan CW et al. Simultaneous spectral domain OCT and fundus autofluorescence imaging of the macula and microperimetric correspondence after successful repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 311-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Delolme MP, Dugas B, Nicot F et al. Anatomical and functional macular changes after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula off. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 153: 128-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hisatomi T, Sakamoto T, Goto Y et al. Critical role of photoreceptor apoptosis in functional damage after retinal detachment. Curr Eye Res 2002; 24: 161-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar