Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51(10): 1165-1170
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1335185
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Pancreas mobile

Pancreas mobile
C. De Molo*
1   Medizinische Klinik 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim
,
X. W. Cui*
1   Medizinische Klinik 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim
,
C. Pirri
1   Medizinische Klinik 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim
,
A. Ignee
1   Medizinische Klinik 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim
,
M. Hocke
2   Internal Medicine II, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena
,
D. G. Schreiber-Dietrich
3   Pädiatrie, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim
,
C. F. Dietrich
1   Medizinische Klinik 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 November 2012

23 February 2013

Publication Date:
11 October 2013 (online)

Abstract

Background and Aim: Up to now, little is known about the mobility of the pancreas due to changes in posture. The present study was conducted to assess the position of the pancreas in the left recumbent posture (endoscopy posture), the pancreatic mobility during changes of the posture from supine to endoscopy posture and also evaluates the possible factors associated with pancreatic mobility.

Methods: 199 patients with (68) or without chronic pancreatitis were examined using conventional gray-scale transabdominal ultrasound to image the position and mobility of the pancreatic head with reference to the vertebral spine and aorta in the supine and left recumbent position. In a subgroup of 75 consecutive healthy subjects regarding the pancreas, the exact moving distance of the central line of the pancreatic head from the supine to left recumbent position was obtained regarding the central line of the spine as the reference. Besides the 199 patients, 50 patients without pancreatic pathology were evaluated by endoscopic ultrasound with radial transducers.

Results: On conventional ultrasound in supine (left lateral) position the percentage of patients with right-aortal, pre-aortal, left-aortal pancreatic head were 91.0 % (49 %), 8.0 % (31 %) and 1.0 % (20 %), respectively. Significant movement of the pancreatic head in relation to the aorta was observed in 48 % of patients. The moving distance was correlated to the age, sex and the presence of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas mobility was more pronounced in young healthy females. No association was found between the moving distance and the body mass index (BMI) and splenic size. On endoscopic ultrasound, the orientation of the pancreas with a view of more (or equal) than 180o was observed in 48 % and less than 180o in 52 % of patients.

Conclusion: Pancreas mobile is a common phenomenon (about 50 %) which has not often been recognized in daily routine. This phenomenon is more likely in healthy young females. This knowledge might be of importance for improved interpretation of endoscopic ultrasound imaging examinations in patients with and without peripancreatic infiltration.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund und Studienziel: Das Pancreas mobile ist ein bisher in der Literatur wenig beachtetes Phänomen. Veränderungen der Lagevariabilität könnten eine Bedeutung für die Diagnostik entzündlicher und neoplastischer Pankreaserkrankungen haben. Die postulierte Lageänderung in strenger Linksseitenlage wäre insbesondere bei der endoskopischen Ultraschalluntersuchung (EUS) von Bedeutung.

Methode: 199 Patienten mit (68) oder ohne Zeichen der chronischen Pankreatitis wurden in die Studie eingeschlossen. Mittels konventioneller B-Bild-Sonographie wurde die Lage des Pankreaskopfs in Relation zur Aorta und Wirbelsäule in Rückenlage und in strenger Linksseitenlage („endoskopische Position“) des Patienten untersucht. Des Weiteren wurde die Form des Pankreas bei 50 Patienten mit endoskopischem Ultraschall untersucht. Kriterium war das Ausmaß der Pankreasdarstellung in einem Bildausschnitt (> oder ≤ 180o).

Ergebnisse: Der Pankreaskopf befand sich in Rückenlage (Linksseitenlage) bei 91 % (49 %) der Patienten rechts vertebral, bei 8 % (31 %) antevertebral (mittig) und bei 1 % (20 %) links der Wirbelsäule. Die Beweglichkeit des Pankreas korrelierte negativ zum Alter des Patienten und zum Vorliegen einer chronischen Pankreatitis. Das Pancreas mobile fand sich gehäuft bei gesunden jungen weiblichen Patienten. Es fand sich keine Assoziation zum Body-Mass-Index (BMI) und zur Milzgröße. Mittels EUS fand sich das Pancreas mobile bei 48 % > 180o und bei 52 % ≤ 180o.

Schlussfolgerung: Das Pancreas mobile ist häufiger als bisher vermutet insbesondere bei jungen Frauen. Die Mobilität des Pankreas ist für die Endosonografie von Bedeutung, da sich das longitudinal ausgerichtete Organ U-förmig verändern kann. Eine eingeschränkte Beweglichkeit findet sich insbesondere bei entzündlichen und neoplastischen Erkrankungen mit Infiltration der Umgebung.

* Both authors equally contributed to the paper


 
  • References

  • 1 Busnardo AC, DiDio LJ, Tidrick RT et al. History of the pancreas. Am J Surg 1983; 146: 539-550
  • 2 Borley NR. Chapter 87, Pancreas. In Standring S editor Gray’s Anatomy, 39th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2005; 1231-1238
  • 3 Bhasin DK, Rana SS, Chandail VS. The pancreas and respiration: oblivious to the obvious!. JOP 2006; 7: 578-583
  • 4 Bussels B, Goethals L, Feron M et al. Respiration-induced movement of the upper abdominal organs: a pitfall for the three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment of pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol 2003; 68: 69-74
  • 5 Suramo I, Paivansalo M, Myllyla V. Cranio-caudal movements of the liver, pancreas and kidneys in respiration. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1984; 25: 129-131
  • 6 Morgan RA, Dubbins PA. Pancreatic and renal mobility. Clin Radiol 1992; 45: 88-91
  • 7 Dietrich CF, Hocke M, Jenssen C. [Interventional endosonography]. Ultraschall Med 2011; 32: 8-22, quiz
  • 8 Dietrich CF, Nuernberg D. Lehratlas der interventionellen Sonographie. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2011
  • 9 Gottschalk U, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. [Ultrasound-guided interventions and description of the equipment]. Z Gastroenterol 2010; 48: 1305-1316
  • 10 Gottschalk U, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. [Ultrasound guided interventions, part 1, diagnostic procedures]. Z Gastroenterol 2009; 47: 682-690
  • 11 EFSUMB. Course Book. London: European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; 2012
  • 12 Dietrich CF. Cases of the Month (EFSUMB website). www.efsumb.org 2012
  • 13 D’Onofrio M, Vullierme MP, Válek V. et al. Chapter 5, Pancreas. In Dietrich CF, editor EFSUMB Course Book on Ultrasound. London: European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; 2012: 145-165
  • 14 Dietrich CF, Jenssen C. [Evidence based endoscopic ultrasound]. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 599-621
  • 15 Horst E, Micke O, Moustakis C et al. Conformal therapy for pancreatic cancer: variation of organ position due to gastrointestinal distention – implications for treatment planning. Radiology 2002; 222: 681-686
  • 16 Langen KM, Jones DT. Organ motion and its management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 50: 265-278
  • 17 Sienz M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. [Reference values in abdominal ultrasound – biliopancreatic system and spleen]. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 845-870
  • 18 Jenssen C, Dietrich CF. [Endoscopic ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis]. Z Gastroenterol 2005; 43: 737-749
  • 19 Kivisaari L, Makela P, Aarimaa M. Pancreatic mobility: an important factor in pancreatic computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982; 6: 854-856
  • 20 Bryan PJ, Custar S, Haaga JR et al. Respiratory movement of the pancreas: an ultrasonic study. J Ultrasound Med 1984; 3: 317-320
  • 21 Dunn GD, Gibson RN. The left-sided pancreas. Radiology 1986; 159: 713-714
  • 22 Syed AB, Mahal RS, Schumm LP et al. Pancreas size and volume on computed tomography in normal adults. Pancreas 2012; 41: 589-595
  • 23 Di Giandomenico V, Filippone A, Basilico R et al. Reproducibility of ultrasound measurement of pancreatic size with new advanced high-resolution dynamic image scanners. J Clin Ultrasound 1993; 21: 77-86
  • 24 Dietrich CF, Hirche TO, Ott M et al. Real-time tissue elastography in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 718-720
  • 25 Braganza JM, Hunt LP, Warwick F. Relationship between pancreatic exocrine function and ductal morphology in chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 1982; 82: 1341-1347
  • 26 Hirche TO, Ignee A, Barreiros AP et al. Indications and limitations of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of focal pancreatic lesions. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 910-917
  • 27 Hocke M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. Advanced endosonographic diagnostic tools for discrimination of focal chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma – elastography, contrast enhanced high mechanical index (CEHMI) and low mechanical index (CELMI) endosonography in direct comparison. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 199-203
  • 28 Yashima Y, Sasahira N, Isayama H et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for noninvasive assessment of chronic pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 427-432
  • 29 Villareal DT, Banks MR, Patterson BW et al. Weight loss therapy improves pancreatic endocrine function in obese older adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16: 1349-1354