Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Sensory Tests for Diagnosis of Sensory Disturbances

Abstract

Background Clinical diagnosis of sensory disturbances is extremely challenging, partly because the utility of sensory tests is questionable. Transection of C7 nerve root provides an objective assessment model to determine the diagnostic accuracy of sensory tests. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments (SWM; Sammons Preston, Bolingbrook, IL), static two-point discrimination (s2PD), and current perception threshold (CPT) tests in patients with contralateral C7 nerve root transfer.

Methods The contralateral index finger of patients was tested preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, including the Revised Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2), SWM, s2PD, and CPT tests. The SF-MPQ-2 was used as a gold standard for sensory disturbances.

Results A total of 38 patients were included in the study. The likelihood probability ratio of SWM and CPT tests generated small shifts in probability, whereas the s2PD test did not show any capacity to detect sensory disturbances. The areas under the curves (AUC) for SWM and CPT tests were 0.724 and 0.697, respectively. Based on different positive test standards, the AUCs for s2PD (≥ 6 mm) and s2PD (≥ 7 mm) tests were 0.632 and 0.658, respectively. When CPT and SWM tests were combined as a measure, the AUC increased to 0.763.

Conclusion The SWM and CPT tests show a small capacity to detect sensory disturbances, whereas the s2PD test does not show any diagnostic capacity. To better understand sensory disturbances, a comprehensive testing protocol including valid measures of physical impairment and symptom-specific measurement tools should be adopted.

Keywords

sensory disturbances - contralateral C7 nerve root transfer - sensory test

• References

• 1 Walk D, Sehgal N, Moeller-Bertram T , et al. Quantitative sensory testing and mapping: a review of nonautomated quantitative methods for examination of the patient with neuropathic pain. Clin J Pain 2009; 25 (7) 632-640
• 2 Equipment AAEM ; AAEM Equipment and Computer Committee. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Technology review: the Neurometer Current Perception Threshold (CPT). Muscle Nerve 1999; 22 (4) 523-531
• 3 Ziccardi VB, Dragoo J, Eliav E, Benoliel R. Comparison of current perception threshold electrical testing to clinical sensory testing for lingual nerve injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70 (2) 289-294
• 4 Wong KH, Coert JH, Robinson PH, Meek MF. Comparison of assessment tools to score recovery of function after repair of traumatic lesions of the median nerve. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2006; 40 (4) 219-224
• 5 Patel MR, Bassini L. A comparison of five tests for determining hand sensibility. J Reconstr Microsurg 1999; 15 (7) 523-526
• 6 Kang EK, Lim JY, Shin HI, Gong HS, Oh JH, Paik NJ. Comparison between nerve conduction studies and current perception threshold test in carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurophysiol Clin 2008; 38 (2) 127-131
• 7 Keizer D, van Wijhe M, Post WJ, Uges DR, Wierda JM. Assessment of the clinical relevance of quantitative sensory testing with Von Frey monofilaments in patients with allodynia and neuropathic pain. A pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24 (8) 658-663
• 8 Franzblau A, Werner RA, Johnston E, Torrey S. Evaluation of current perception threshold testing as a screening procedure for carpal tunnel syndrome among industrial workers. J Occup Med 1994; 36 (9) 1015-1021
• 9 Gu YD, Zhang GM, Chen DS, Yan JG, Cheng XM, Chen L. Seventh cervical nerve root transfer from the contralateral healthy side for treatment of brachial plexus root avulsion. J Hand Surg [Br] 1992; 17 (5) 518-521
• 10 Gu YD. Distribution of the sensory endings of the C7 nerve root and its clinic significance. J Hand Surg [Br] 1994; 19 (1) 67-68
• 11 Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Revicki DA , et al. Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Pain 2009; 144 (1-2) 35-42
• 12 Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271 (9) 703-707
• 13 Zhu W, Nancy Z, Ning W. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, associated confidence interval and ROC analysis with practical SAS® implementations. NESUG proceedings: Health care and life sciences; 2010; Baltimore, Maryland
• 14 Lee MW, McPhee RW, Stringer MD. An evidence-based approach to human dermatomes. Clin Anat 2008; 21 (5) 363-373
• 15 Novak CB, Katz J. Neuropathic pain in patients with upper-extremity nerve injury. Physiother Can 2010; 62 (3) 190-201
• 16 Wang SF, Li PC, Xue YH, Yiu HW, Li YC, Wang HH. Contralateral C7 nerve transfer with direct coaptation to restore lower trunk function after traumatic brachial plexus avulsion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (9) 821-827 , S1–S2
• 17 Lundborg G, Rosén B. The two-point discrimination test—time for a re-appraisal?. J Hand Surg [Br] 2004; 29 (5) 418-422
• 18 Jerosch-Herold C. Assessment of sensibility after nerve injury and repair: a systematic review of evidence for validity, reliability and responsiveness of tests. J Hand Surg [Br] 2005; 30 (3) 252-264
• 19 Nishimura A, Ogura T, Hase H , et al. Objective evaluation of sensory function in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome using the current perception threshold. J Orthop Sci 2003; 8 (5) 625-628
• 20 Horng YS, Lin MC, Feng CT, Huang CH, Wu HC, Wang JD. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire in patients with hand injury. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (3) 430-436
• 21 Leechavengvongs S, Ngamlamiat K, Malungpaishrope K, Uerpairotkit C, Witoonchart K, Kulkittiya S. End-to-side radial sensory to median nerve transfer to restore sensation and relieve pain in C5 and C6 nerve root avulsion. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (2) 209-215
• 22 van Nes SI, Faber CG, Hamers RM , et al; PeriNomS Study Group. Revising two-point discrimination assessment in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79 (7) 832-834
• 23 Aszmann OC, Dellon AL. Relationship between cutaneous pressure threshold and two-point discrimination. J Reconstr Microsurg 1998; 14 (6) 417-421
• 24 Dellon AL. The moving two-point discrimination test: clinical evaluation of the quickly adapting fiber/receptor system. J Hand Surg Am 1978; 3 (5) 474-481
• 25 Gelberman RH, Szabo RM, Williamson RV, Dimick MP. Sensibility testing in peripheral-nerve compression syndromes. An experimental study in humans. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65 (5) 632-638
• 26 Jerosch-Herold C. A study of the relative responsiveness of five sensibility tests for assessment of recovery after median nerve injury and repair. J Hand Surg [Br] 2003; 28 (3) 255-260
• 27 Lee S, Kim H, Choi S, Park Y, Kim Y, Cho B. Clinical usefulness of the two-site Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Korean Med Sci 2003; 18 (1) 103-107
• 28 Kumar S, Fernando DJ, Veves A, Knowles EA, Young MJ, Boulton AJ. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: a simple, effective and inexpensive screening device for identifying diabetic patients at risk of foot ulceration. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1991; 13 (1-2) 63-67
• 29 Villarroel MF, Orsini MB, Lima RC, Antunes CM. Comparative study of the cutaneous sensation of leprosy-suspected lesions using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and quantitative thermal testing. Lepr Rev 2007; 78 (2) 102-109
• 30 Liu S, Kopacz DJ, Carpenter RL. Quantitative assessment of differential sensory nerve block after lidocaine spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995; 82 (1) 60-63
• 31 Kurozawa Y, Nasu Y. Current perception thresholds in vibration-induced neuropathy. Arch Environ Health 2001; 56 (3) 254-256
• 32 Lander L, Lou W, House R. Nerve conduction studies and current perception thresholds in workers assessed for hand-arm vibration syndrome. Occup Med (Lond) 2007; 57 (4) 284-289
• 33 American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Guidelines in electrodiagnostic medicine. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve Suppl 1999; 8: S141-S167
• 34 Yang J, Qin B, Fu G , et al. Modified pathological classification of brachial plexus root injury and its MR imaging characteristics. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (3) 171-178
• 35 Lin H, Sheng J, Hou C. The effectiveness of contralateral C7 nerve root transfer for the repair of avulsed C7 nerve root in total brachial plexus injury: an experimental study in rats. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (5) 325-330
• 36 Flores LP. Clinical patterns of spontaneous recovery of paralyzed triceps brachii associated with C5 to C7 injuries of the brachial plexus. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (3) 181-187
• 37 Estrella EP, Favila Jr AS. Nerve transfers for shoulder function for traumatic brachial plexus injuries. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (1) 59-64