Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1395286
Passung von indirekt auf Silikonmodellen hergestellten Kompositinlays
Precision of fit of indirect class II composite inlays built on silicone modelsPublication History
Publication Date:
11 October 2014 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Diese In-vitro-Studie vergleicht in 2 Versuchsreihen die manuelle Herstellung von Kompositinlays mit der CAD / CAM-Herstellung. In beiden Versuchsreihen wurden jeweils 10 Inlays hergestellt und in eine metallische MOD-Urkavität eingepasst. Die Passungsgenauigkeit wurde anhand mikroskopischer Fotografien von Silikonrepliken der Zementfuge ermittelt. Es wurden signifikant bessere Passungsgenauigkeiten bei manuell hergestellten Inlays (p < 0,001) als bei der CAD / CAM-Herstellung festgestellt.
This in vitro-study compares manual production to CAD / CAM production of indirect composite inlays. Each 10 inlays were built for both groups and were adapted into a cavity of an artificial metal tooth. Silicone replicas of the cement gaps were made. The thicknesses of these replicas were measured using a light reflecting microscope. It could be shown that the precision of the inlays which were manually produced was significally better (p < 0,001) than the precision of the CAD / CAM inlays.
-
Literatur
- 1 Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2003; 7: 71-79
- 2 Spreafico RC, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo. J Dent 2005; 33: 499-507
- 3 Ferreira MC, Vieira RS. Marginal leakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Dent 2008; 36: 322-325
- 4 Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2000; 28: 375-382
- 5 Fasbinder DJ et al. The clinical performance of CAD / CAM-generated composite inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 1714-1723
- 6 Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD / CAM. J Dent 2007; 35: 68-73
- 7 Brinkmann H. Experimentelle In-vitro-Untersuchung zur Passgenauigkeit viergliedriger Seitenzahnbrücken aus Zirkoniumdioxid, Dissertation, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. 2007
- 8 Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD / CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008; 204: 505-511
- 9 Karakaya S, Sengun A, Ozer F. Evaluation of internal adaptation in ceramic and composite resin inlays by silicon replica technique. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 448-453
- 10 Zeiger DN et al. Evaluation of dental composite shrinkage and leakage in extracted teeth using X-ray microcomputed tomography. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1213-1220
- 11 Moldovan O, Luthardt RG. Interne 3D-Passgenauigkeit CAD / CAM-gefertigter Zirkondioxidgerüste für den Seitenzahnbereich. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 2006; 61: 416-416
- 12 Moldovan O et al. Three-dimensional fit of CAD / CAM-made zirconia copings. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 1273-1278
- 13 Ozakar-Ilday N et al. Three-year clinical performance of two indirect composite inlays compared to direct composite restorations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; 18: 521-528
- 14 Cassin AM, Pearson GJ. Microleakage studies comparing a one-visit indirect composite inlay system and a direct composite restorative technique. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19: 265-270
- 15 Duquia Rde C et al. Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: in vitro comparison of indirect and direct composite. Oper Dent 2006; 3: 682-687
- 16 Asensio Acevedo R et al. The use of indirect composite veneers to rehabilitate patients with dental erosion: a case report. Eur J Esthet Dent 2013; 8: 414-431
- 17 Price RB, Gerrow JD. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 306-313
- 18 Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impression materials. Scand J Dent Res 1989; 97: 375-379
- 19 Wada K. Studies on dimensional accuracy of working casts made by various impression techniques--influence of undercuts on dimensional accuracy. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi 1992; 59: 518-540
- 20 Faria AC et al. Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials. Braz Oral Res 2008; 22: 293-298
- 21 Federic DR, Caputo A. Comparing the accuracy of reversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 183-188
- 22 Eriksson A et al. Alginate impressions for fixed prosthodontics. A 20 year follow up study. Swed Dent J 2004; 28: 53-59
- 23 Ratnaweera PM et al. A clinical evaluation of the agar alginate combined impression: dimensional accuracy of dies by new master crown technique. J Med Dent Sci 2003; 50: 231-238
- 24 Sun L, Li HB, Chu BF. Three-dimensional accuracy of plaster casts obtained using three impression materials. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2010; 30: 257-259